Surgical results of transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid comparing the C-shaped and linear incision techniques

被引:1
|
作者
Miura, Mauricio Schneider [1 ]
Ogando, Patricia Barcelos [1 ]
Pasqualini, Marina Paese [1 ]
Neves, Hemily [1 ]
Lubianca Neto, Jose Faibes [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp St Casa Porto Alegre, Dept Otolaryngol, Rua Prof Annes Dias,295,Ctr, BR-90020160 Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do S, Brazil
关键词
Bone conduction hearing aids; Hearing loss; Postoperative complications; BAHA; 4 ATTRACT SYSTEM; SKIN REACTIONS; BAHA ATTRACT; IMPLANTATION; OUTCOMES; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s00405-022-07778-w
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Purpose The aim of the study is to compare the operative time and postoperative complication outcomes for bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implants using two different techniques: the C-shaped incision technique and the linear incision technique.Methods An analysis was carried out of 38 patients implanted with transcutaneous BAHAs during a 4-year period in a single otolaryngology department.Results The implantation was carried out under general anesthesia. Operative time was significant lower with the linear technique compared to the C-shaped technique (76.55 min, SD 16.75 vs. 93.17 min, SD 19.82; p = 0.007). There was no difference in postoperative complications between the two techniques.Conclusions The use of linear incision for transcutaneous BAHA system implantation is associated with a reduced surgery time compared to the C-shaped technique, with no increase in postoperative complications.
引用
收藏
页码:2749 / 2754
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Surgical placement and efficacy of a bone-anchored hearing aid in a dog with conductive deafness
    Sommerlad, S
    MacKenzie, D
    Divitini, J
    Goldstein, L
    Filippich, L
    AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY PRACTITIONER, 1999, 29 (02): : 70 - +
  • [22] An alternate approach for surgical dressing of bone-anchored hearing aid abutment sites
    Falcone, Michael T.
    Labadie, Robert F.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2007, 117 (04): : 614 - 616
  • [23] A Comparison of the Operative Techniques and the Postoperative Complications for Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Implantation
    Steehler, Mark W.
    Larner, Sean P.
    Mintz, Joshua S.
    Steehler, Matthew K.
    Lipman, Sidney P.
    Griffith, Shane
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 22 (04) : 368 - 373
  • [24] First Report: Linear Incision for Placement of a Magnetically Coupled Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant
    Barry, Jonnae Y.
    Reghunathan, Saranya
    Jacob, Abraham
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2017, 38 (02) : 221 - 224
  • [25] PATIENTS ATTITUDES TO THE BONE-ANCHORED HEARING-AID - RESULTS OF A QUESTIONNAIRE STUDY
    TJELLSTROM, A
    JACOBSSON, M
    NORVELL, B
    ALBREKTSSON, T
    SCANDINAVIAN AUDIOLOGY, 1989, 18 (02): : 119 - 123
  • [26] Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: dermatome versus linear incision technique
    Ruben M. Strijbos
    Steven J. H. Bom
    Stefan Zwerver
    Myrthe K. S. Hol
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2017, 274 : 109 - 117
  • [27] AUDIOLOGICAL RESULTS FOR THE BONE-ANCHORED HEARING-AID HC220
    MYLANUS, EAM
    SNIK, AFM
    JORRITSMA, FF
    CREMERS, CWRJ
    EAR AND HEARING, 1994, 15 (01): : 87 - 92
  • [28] Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: dermatome versus linear incision technique
    Strijbos, Ruben M.
    Bom, Steven J. H.
    Zwerver, Stefan
    Hol, Myrthe K. S.
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 274 (01) : 109 - 117
  • [29] Can audiometric results predict qualitative hearing improvements in bone-anchored hearing aid recipients?
    McNeil, M. L.
    Gulliver, M.
    Morris, D. P.
    Makki, F. M.
    Bance, M.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2014, 128 (01): : 35 - 42
  • [30] The bone-anchored hearing aid in children:: A surgical and questionnaire follow-up study
    Priwin, C
    Granström, G
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2005, 132 (04) : 559 - 565