The Nexus of Digital Authoritarianism and Religious Populism

被引:1
|
作者
Yilmaz, Ihsan [1 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Alfred Deakin Inst Citizenship & Globalisat, Melbourne, Vic 3125, Australia
关键词
digital authoritarianism; authoritarianism; religion; religious populism; cyberspace; social media; Turkey; SOCIAL MEDIA; COMMUNICATION; SURVEILLANCE; SECURITY; TURKEY;
D O I
10.3390/rel14060747
中图分类号
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号
010107 ;
摘要
This paper delves into the intricate relationship between religious populism and the legitimization of digital authoritarianism in Turkey. Specifically, it investigates how the ruling party, AKP, has strategically linked Islamist values to state policies as a means of justifying its repressive control over digital technology. Through an examination of internet governance at multiple levels-full network-level governance, sub-network or website-level governance, proxy or corporation-level governance, and network-node or individual-level governance-the study reveals the instrumentalization of religious populism to consolidate support and validate the government's autocratic agenda. Furthermore, it sheds light on the role of state-controlled religious institutions, traditional media, social media outlets, as well as religious leaders and organizations in shaping public opinion, enabling the government to exert greater control over the dissemination of information. By dissecting the religious populist justification of digital authoritarianism in Turkey, this research provides valuable insights into the complex dynamics at play in the realm of online governance.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Authoritarianism, Populism, and the Global Retreat of Democracy: A Curated Discussion
    Adler, Paul S.
    Adly, Amr
    Armanios, Daniel Erian
    Battilana, Julie
    Bodrozic, Zlatko
    Clegg, Stewart
    Davis, Gerald F.
    Gartenberg, Claudine
    Glynn, Mary Ann
    Gumusay, Ali Aslan
    Haveman, Heather A.
    Leonardi, Paul
    Lounsbury, Michael
    McGahan, Anita M.
    Meyer, Renate
    Phillips, Nelson
    Sheppard-Jones, Kara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INQUIRY, 2023, 32 (01) : 3 - 20
  • [22] Authoritarianism, Populism, and the Environment: Comparative Experiences, Insights, and Perspectives
    McCarthy, James
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GEOGRAPHERS, 2019, 109 (02) : 301 - 313
  • [23] AUTHORITARIANISM IN THE CONTEXT OF NEOLIBERAL GLOBALIZATION: THE RISE OF AUTHORITARIAN POPULISM
    Polajnar, Neven
    Luksic, Igor
    [J]. TEORIJA IN PRAKSA, 2020, 57 (01): : 210 - 231
  • [24] Democracy, populism and authoritarianism in Latin America, 20122022: a reassessment
    Avila, Carlos Federico Dominguez
    [J]. TEMPO E ARGUMENTO, 2024, 16 (41):
  • [25] Authoritarianism and religious identification: Response to threats on religious beliefs
    Shaffer, Barbara A.
    Hastings, Brad M.
    [J]. MENTAL HEALTH RELIGION & CULTURE, 2007, 10 (02) : 151 - 158
  • [26] Secularization and religious populism in Portugal
    Moniz, Jorge Botelho
    Brissos-Lino, Jose
    [J]. ESTUDOS DE RELIGIAO, 2023, 37 (01): : 15 - 42
  • [27] Varieties of Digital Authoritarianism
    Howells, Laura
    Henry, Laura A.
    [J]. COMMUNIST AND POST-COMMUNIST STUDIES, 2021, 54 (04) : 1 - 27
  • [28] Defining Digital Authoritarianism
    James S. Pearson
    [J]. Philosophy & Technology, 2024, 37 (2)
  • [29] RELIGIOUS COMMITMENT, SOCIAL DISTANCE, AND AUTHORITARIANISM
    JOHNSON, DP
    [J]. REVIEW OF RELIGIOUS RESEARCH, 1977, 18 (02) : 99 - 113
  • [30] Competitive Authoritarianism and Populism in Serbia Under Vucic in Political Cartoons
    Vladisavljevic, Nebojsa
    Krstic, Aleksandra
    [J]. EUROPE-ASIA STUDIES, 2023, 75 (09) : 1429 - 1452