Effects of high intensity interval training versus moderate intensity continuous training on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Gu, Shengyuan [1 ]
Du, Xinchao [1 ]
Wang, Dongwei [2 ]
Yu, Yaohua [3 ]
Guo, Shifang [3 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Dept Cardiol, Zhengzhou Cent Hosp, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Univ, Dept Cardiac Rehabil, Zhengzhou Cent Hosp, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[3] Zhengzhou Univ, Dept Resp Med & Pulm Rehabil, Zhengzhou Cent Hosp, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 08期
关键词
CARDIAC REHABILITATION; ESC GUIDELINES; OXYGEN-UPTAKE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0290362
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction and aims High intensity interval training (HIIT) is considered as an alternative exercise modality to moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) for heart failure (HF) patients. Yet a growing number of trials demonstrated inconsistent findings about the effectiveness of HIIT versus MICT until SMARTEX study and OptimEx-Clin study have made a consistent negative conclusion that HIIT was not superior to MICT. The aim of this study was to conduct a metaanalysis involving a subgroup analysis of total exercise time (TET) and disease categories of HF to investigate if TET could affect the superiority of HIIT when compared with MICT. Methods and results An electronic literature search of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed for this review. 16 studies of 661 patients were finally pooled into quantitative synthesis. The weighted mean difference (WMD) and standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for quantitative synthesis of outcomes. HIIT was superior to MICT in improving peak oxygen consumption (Peak VO2) (WMD: 1.68 ml. kg-1. min-1 95% CI: 0.81 to 2.55 n = 661). The subgroup analysis of TET showed that HIIT was superior to MICT in improving Peak VO2 in "short time" subgroup (WMD: 1.61 ml. kg-1. min-1 95% CI: 0.45 to 2.77 n = 166) and in "medium time" subgroup (WMD: 1.74 ml. kg-1. min-1 95% CI: 0.53 to 2.95 n = 420), and that there was no significant difference between HIIT and MICT in improving Peak VO2 in "long time" subgroup (WMD: 0.62 ml. kg-1. min-1 95% CI: -1.34 to 2.58 n = 75). Conclusions The superiority of HIIT to MICT in improving Peak VO2 arose in a short to medium length of TET whereas it was effaced by an increment of TET. This "paradox" of TET on HIIT versus MICT might be due to the increasing poor adherence to target exercise intensity over time.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Acute effect of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on appetite perception: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hu, Mingzhu
    Nie, Jinlei
    Lei, On Kei
    Shi, Qingde
    Kong, Zhaowei
    [J]. APPETITE, 2023, 182
  • [22] The Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Exercise Capacity and Prognosis in Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Cuihua
    Xing, Jun
    Zhao, Baoli
    Wang, Yahui
    Zhang, Lizhuang
    Wang, Yebo
    Zheng, Mingqi
    Liu, Gang
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 2022
  • [23] The Effect of High-intensity Interval Training vs Moderate-intensity Continuous Training on Liver Fat: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sabag, Angelo
    Barr, Loren
    Armour, Mike
    Armstrong, Alex
    Baker, Callum J.
    Twigg, Stephen M.
    Chang, Dennis
    Hackett, Daniel A.
    Keating, Shelley E.
    George, Jacob
    Johnson, Nathan A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2022, 107 (03): : 862 - 881
  • [24] The Effects Of High Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate Intensity Continuous Training On Energy Compensation
    Sawyer, Brandon J.
    Pattison, Kai
    Dowden, Eric
    Beaver, Breanna
    Barragan, Jacob A.
    Lynch, Heidi M.
    [J]. MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2020, 52 (07) : 344 - 345
  • [25] Efectiveness of High Intensity Interval Training versus Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, in relation to aerobic capacity, left ventricular ejection fraction and quality of life. Systematic review
    Collados-Gutierrez, Albert
    Gutierrez-Vilahu, Lourdes
    [J]. RETOS-NUEVAS TENDENCIAS EN EDUCACION FISICA DEPORTE Y RECREACION, 2023, (49): : 135 - 145
  • [26] Effects of high-intensity interval training on functional performance and maximal oxygen uptake in comparison with moderate intensity continuous training in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    T. Neuendorf
    R. Haase
    S. Schroeder
    M. Schumann
    N. Nitzsche
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023, 31
  • [27] The effect of high Intensity interval training versus moderate intensity continuous training on arterial stiffness and 24 h blood pressure responses: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Way, Kimberley L.
    Sultana, Rachelle N.
    Sabag, Angelo
    Baker, Michael K.
    Johnson, Nathan A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2019, 22 (04) : 385 - 391
  • [28] Effects of high-intensity interval training on functional performance and maximal oxygen uptake in comparison with moderate intensity continuous training in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Neuendorf, T.
    Haase, R.
    Schroeder, S.
    Schumann, M.
    Nitzsche, N.
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2023, 31 (12)
  • [29] The effects of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on fat loss and cardiometabolic health in pediatric obesity: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Jing-Xin
    Zhu, Lin
    Deng, Jia-Min
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (10)
  • [30] Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Aerobic Capacity in Cardiac Patients: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
    Xie, Bin
    Yan, Xianfeng
    Cai, Xiangna
    Li, Jilin
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 2017