Bridging POMDPs and Bayesian decision making for robust maintenance planning under model uncertainty: An application to railway systems

被引:5
|
作者
Arcieri, Giacomo [1 ]
Hoelzl, Cyprien [1 ]
Schwery, Oliver [2 ]
Straub, Daniel [3 ]
Papakonstantinou, Konstantinos G. [4 ]
Chatzi, Eleni [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Struct Engn, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Railways SBB, CH-3000 Bern, Switzerland
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Engn Risk Anal Grp, D-80333 Munich, Germany
[4] Penn State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
Partially observable Markov decision processes; Bayesian inference; Optimal maintenance planning; Model uncertainty; Hidden Markov models; Dynamic Programming; STRUCTURAL INSPECTION; MARKOV; POLICIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2023.109496
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) describes a process for inferring quantifiable metrics of structural condition, which can serve as input to support decisions on the operation and maintenance of infrastructure assets. Given the long lifespan of critical structures, this problem can be cast as a sequential decision making problem over prescribed horizons. Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs) offer a formal framework to solve the underlying optimal planning task. However, two issues can undermine the POMDP solutions. Firstly, the need for a model that can adequately describe the evolution of the structural condition under deterioration or corrective actions and, secondly, the non-trivial task of recovery of the observation process parameters from available monitoring data. Despite these potential challenges, the adopted POMDP models do not typically account for uncertainty on model parameters, leading to solutions which can be unrealistically confident. In this work, we address both key issues. We present a framework to estimate POMDP transition and observation model parameters directly from available data, via Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling of a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) conditioned on actions. The MCMC inference estimates distributions of the involved model parameters. We then form and solve the POMDP problem by exploiting the inferred distributions, to derive solutions that are robust to model uncertainty. We successfully apply our approach on maintenance planning for railway track assets on the basis of a "fractal value"indicator, which is computed from actual railway monitoring data.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bayesian differential programming for robust systems identification under uncertainty
    Yang, Yibo
    Bhouri, Mohamed Aziz
    Perdikaris, Paris
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2020, 476 (2243):
  • [22] Robust Adaptive Markov Decision Processes PLANNING WITH MODEL UNCERTAINTY
    Bertuccelli, Luca F.
    Wu, Albert
    How, Jonathan P.
    IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 2012, 32 (05): : 96 - 109
  • [23] An evolutionary Bayesian belief network methodology for participatory decision making under uncertainty: An application to groundwater management
    Farmani, Raziyeh
    Henriksen, Hans Jorgen
    Savic, Dragan
    Butler, David
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 8 (03) : 456 - 461
  • [24] Bayesian enhanced decision making for deteriorating repairable systems with preventive maintenance
    Huang, Yeu-Shiang
    Hung, Chi-Chang
    Fang, Chih-Chiang
    NAVAL RESEARCH LOGISTICS, 2008, 55 (02) : 105 - 115
  • [25] Bridging Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty (DMDU) and Transition Management (TM) to improve strategic planning for sustainable development
    Malekpour, Shirin
    Walker, Warren E.
    de Haan, Fjalar J.
    Frantzeskaki, Niki
    Marchau, Vincent A. W. J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2020, 107 : 158 - 167
  • [26] FUZZY REASONING MODEL FOR DECISION MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY
    Bartos, Jiri
    Prochazka, Jaroslav
    Klimes, Cyril
    Walek, Bogdan
    Pesl, Martin
    16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING MENDEL 2010, 2010, : 203 - 209
  • [27] A cognitive and participative decision-making model for transportation planning under different uncertainty levels
    Carteni, Armando
    Marzano, Vittorio
    Henke, Ilaria
    Cascetta, Ennio
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2022, 116 : 386 - 398
  • [28] A decision model for making decisions under epistemic uncertainty and its application to select materials
    Shahinur, Sweety
    Ullah, A. M. M. Sharif
    Noor-E-Alam, Muhammad
    Haniu, Hiroyuki
    Kubo, Akihiko
    AI EDAM-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN ANALYSIS AND MANUFACTURING, 2017, 31 (03): : 298 - 312
  • [29] Robust decision-making under severe uncertainty for conservation management
    Regan, HM
    Ben-Haim, Y
    Langford, B
    Wilson, WG
    Lundberg, P
    Andelman, SJ
    Burgman, MA
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2005, 15 (04) : 1471 - 1477
  • [30] Robust multiattribute decision making under risk and uncertainty in engineering design
    Gurnani, AP
    Lewis, K
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2005, 37 (08) : 813 - 830