An Analysis of Pediatric Ophthalmology Content on TikTok

被引:1
|
作者
Borkhetaria, Rucha K. [1 ]
Devireddy, Nitya [1 ]
Cannon, Nathan [1 ]
Soni, Ajay [2 ]
Ely, Amanda L. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Coll Med, Hershey, PA USA
[2] Penn State Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Hershey, PA USA
[3] Penn State Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, 200 Univ Dr, Suite 800, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
关键词
INFORMATION;
D O I
10.3928/01913913-20230627-01
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess pediatric ophthalmology-related information onTikTok (ByteDance).Methods: The 12 most commonly searched terms from the American Association for Pediatric Ophthal-mology and Strabismus website were queried as TikTok hashtags. The top 20 videos for each hashtag were ana-lyzed for views, likes, comments, saves, shares, author status and gender, content, and engagement level ratio (ELR). Subanalysis of the educational videos for quality, understandability and actionability, and medi-cal accuracy using the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), and modified Medical Information and Content Index (mMICI) was performed.Results: Analysis of 222 videos revealed a cumulative 191,337,973 views. Patients/families created the most videos (60.4%), followed by optometrists (14.4%), other (laypeople/unknown) (9.0%), ophthalmologists (7.7%), non-ophthalmology physicians (4.5%), and nurses (4.1%). Content was predominantly patient experi-ence (56.8%), followed by educational (25.2%), humor (11.7%), self-promotional (3.6%), procedures (0.9%), other (0.9%), advertisements (0.5%), and career (0.5%). Educational videos had a lower ELR than humorous (3.3 vs 8.2, P < .001) and patient experience (3.3 vs 5.3, P < .001) videos, but more saves than patient experience videos (74 vs 25, P = .009). The mDISCERN scores were greater for videos authored by ophthalmologists (3, P < .001) and optometrists (2.5, P < .001) compared to lay-people (1.5).Ophthalmologist PEMAT understandability scores were greater than non-ophthalmology provid-ers'(95.5% vs 67.4%, P = .002).There was no difference in PEMAT actionability (P = .743) or mMICI scores among the author subgroups (P = .206).Conclusions: Pediatric ophthalmology content on Tik -Tok ranges in quality and understandability. Additional research is needed to help promote posts created by eyecare providers to ensure evidence-based medical content reaches pediatric patients and their families.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 97
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exploring Menstrual Education via TikTok: A Descriptive Content Analysis
    Olsson, Sofia Eva
    Friedlich, Nicole
    Bolds, Alexis
    Hodge, Alison
    Jamali, Taylor
    Lagomichos, Melanie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2024, 75 (02) : 353 - 357
  • [42] BIPOC Experiences of Racial Trauma on TikTok: A Qualitative Content Analysis
    Yi-Hsin Hung
    A’Lyric Miles
    Zachary Trevino
    Carissa DAniello
    Hannah Wood
    Avery Bishop
    Zihan Monshad
    [J]. Contemporary Family Therapy, 2023, 45 : 298 - 308
  • [43] PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY
    不详
    [J]. SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1964, 57 (12) : 1490 - &
  • [44] PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY
    不详
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1964, 48 (12) : 699 - &
  • [45] Pediatric ophthalmology
    Levin, AV
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 1996, 31 (03): : 141 - 141
  • [46] PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY
    不详
    [J]. PRACTITIONER, 1965, 194 (1161) : 438 - &
  • [47] PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY
    FONTAINE, M
    [J]. ANNALES DE PEDIATRIE, 1983, 30 (07): : 463 - 463
  • [48] Pediatric Ophthalmology
    Smolek, Inge
    Egger, Stefan F.
    [J]. SPEKTRUM DER AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2010, 24 (01) : 45 - 48
  • [49] PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY
    不详
    [J]. EYE EAR NOSE AND THROAT MONTHLY, 1965, 44 (01): : 93 - &
  • [50] PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY
    SALZBERG, R
    [J]. BIOLOGIA NEONATORUM, 1965, 8 (01): : 63 - +