An Assurance Case for the DoD Ethical Principles of Artificial Intelligence

被引:0
|
作者
Werner, Benjamin D. [1 ]
Schumeg, Benjamin J. [1 ]
Mills, Tiffany M. [2 ]
Velilla, Elizabeth V. [3 ]
机构
[1] US Army Combat Capabil Dev Command Armaments Ctr, Bldg 62 FCDD ACE QSB, Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806 USA
[2] US Army Combat Capabil Dev Command Armaments Ctr, Bldg 92 FCDD ACE Q, Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806 USA
[3] US Army Combat Capabil Dev Command Armaments Ctr, Bldg 92 FCDD ACE H, Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806 USA
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; Machine Learning; Assurance Case; Ethical Principles; TEVV; Reliability; Safety;
D O I
10.1109/RAMS51473.2023.10088273
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The Ethical Principles of Artificial Intelligence (AI) [1] laid out by the Defense Innovation Board were one of the first publications from the Department of Defense to outline the expectations for AI enabled systems and technologies. This document served as the first guidance for developing agencies and was reviewed to understand the requirements for these new systems. As engineers, the desire is to view the Ethical Principles as evaluation criteria and identify the means by which a system can be qualified against the language laid out by the Defense Innovation Board. One of the first parallels that was identified with this document was the concept of an assurance case. The Ethical Principles do not explicitly lay out any requirements but are more so suggestions or guidelines so the question was how to demonstrate adherence or fulfillment. To this extent the Materiel Release process [2], the process the U.S. Army follows to deploy and field a system, was reviewed as a means to demonstrate fulfillment through the requirements and documentation dictated by that process. This paper demonstrates how the processes and procedures followed by the U.S. Army, in pursuit of mitigating risks for fielding, also in turn fulfill the intent of the Ethical Principles. Upon further review of the principles, it can be observed as design best practices to ensure the development of trusted and assured products. The Materiel Release process is proposed as an assurance case for the adherence to the Ethical Principles of AI. The MR process and associated feeder processes are here compared to the language embodied in the Ethical Principles to the extent that the application of the same rigorous processes done for traditional systems may be applied to AI enabled systems - and in some cases adapted - to ensure justified confidence in the delivered product. Systems that have gone through a Materiel Release review can thus also be said to have demonstrated, as a byproduct, adherence to the Ethical Principles of AI.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ethical artificial intelligence framework for a good AI society: principles, opportunities and perils
    Paraman, Pradeep
    Anamalah, Sanmugam
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2023, 38 (02) : 595 - 611
  • [22] Beyond the Struggle: Artificial Intelligence in the Department of Defense (DoD)
    Hurley, John S.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER WARFARE AND SECURITY (ICCWS 2018), 2018, : 297 - 303
  • [23] Adopting and expanding ethical principles for generative artificial intelligence from military to healthcare
    Oniani, David
    Hilsman, Jordan
    Peng, Yifan
    Poropatich, Ronald K.
    Pamplin, Jeremy C.
    Legault, Gary L.
    Wang, Yanshan
    [J]. NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2023, 6 (01)
  • [24] Ethical principles in the use of artificial intelligence in the financial sector from a European perspective
    Rodriguez, Carmen Parra
    [J]. STUDIA PRAWNICZE KUL, 2022, (01):
  • [25] Adopting and expanding ethical principles for generative artificial intelligence from military to healthcare
    David Oniani
    Jordan Hilsman
    Yifan Peng
    Ronald K. Poropatich
    Jeremy C. Pamplin
    Gary L. Legault
    Yanshan Wang
    [J]. npj Digital Medicine, 6
  • [26] Psychiatric Advance Directives and Artificial Intelligence: A Conceptual Framework for Theoretical and Ethical Principles
    Mouchabac, Stephane
    Adrien, Vladimir
    Falala-Sechet, Clara
    Bonnot, Olivier
    Maatoug, Redwan
    Millet, Bruno
    Peretti, Charles-Siegfried
    Bourla, Alexis
    Ferreri, Florian
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 11
  • [27] Ethical artificial intelligence framework for a good AI society: principles, opportunities and perils
    Pradeep Paraman
    Sanmugam Anamalah
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2023, 38 : 595 - 611
  • [28] Ethical considerations in artificial intelligence
    Safdar, Nabile M.
    Banja, John D.
    Meltzer, Carolyn C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 122
  • [29] Be wary of 'ethical' artificial intelligence
    Stocker, Michael
    [J]. NATURE, 2016, 540 (7634) : 525 - 525
  • [30] Ethical artificial intelligence in paediatrics
    Bach, Samantha
    Sezgin, Emre
    Linwood, Simon Lin
    [J]. LANCET CHILD & ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2022, 6 (12): : 833 - 835