Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Foot and Ankle Disability Index

被引:0
|
作者
Eun, Il-Soo [1 ]
Oh, Yong Seung [1 ]
Kim, Jihoon [1 ]
Jang, Wonkyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Good Samsun Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, 326 Gayadaero, Busan 47007, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY | 2024年 / 63卷 / 01期
关键词
Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI); PROM; self-administered questionnaires; translation; validation; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.1053/j.jfas.2023.08.007
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) is one of the most commonly used tools for evaluating foot and ankle function. Due to the lack of a Korean version for properly evaluating Koreans, it was not possible to compare Korean data with data from other countries using FADI. Therefore, we created a Korean version of the FADI questionnaire and evaluated its reliability and validity. We translated the English version of FADI and FADI-sport into Korean and then back into English. The Korean version of the FADI and FADI-sport, the previously verified visual analog scale (VAS) score, and the previously validated Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-item questionnaire (SF-36) were administered to outpatients with chronic foot and ankle pain. A total of 64 patients who visited the outpatient clinic for chronic foot and ankle pain from January 2023 to March 2023 were included. To evaluate test-retest reliability and internal consistency, we used the intraclass correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha, respectively. We also assessed the concurrent and construct validity of the Korean version of FADI and FADI-sport by comparing them with the VAS and SF-36. Cronbach's alpha values were 0.953 and 0.945 for the FADI and FADI-sport, respectively, indicating good internal consistency. The reproducibility was good, and a strong correlation was observed between FADI, VAS, and SF-36. Therefore, the validation of the Korean version of the FADI was successfully performed, and it isa reliable questionnaire for self-evaluation of a patient's foot and ankle condition. (c) 2023 by the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 35
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS)
    Inge van den Akker-Scheek
    Arnoud Seldentuis
    Inge HF Reininga
    Martin Stevens
    [J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 14
  • [22] Reliability and validity of the Taiwan Chinese version of the foot function index
    Wu, Shih-Huey
    Liang, Huey-Wen
    Hou, Wen-Hsuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 107 (02) : 111 - 118
  • [23] Urdu version of the neck disability index: a reliability and validity study
    Farooq, Muhammad Nazim
    Mohseni-Bandpei, Mohammad A.
    Gilani, Syed Amir
    Hafeez, Ambreen
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2017, 18
  • [24] The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
    Sohn, Seung Il
    Kim, Do Hyung
    Lee, Mi Young
    Cho, Yong Won
    [J]. SLEEP AND BREATHING, 2012, 16 (03) : 803 - 812
  • [25] The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
    Seung Il Sohn
    Do Hyung Kim
    Mi Young Lee
    Yong Won Cho
    [J]. Sleep and Breathing, 2012, 16 : 803 - 812
  • [26] Urdu version of the neck disability index: a reliability and validity study
    Muhammad Nazim Farooq
    Mohammad A. Mohseni-Bandpei
    Syed Amir Gilani
    Ambreen Hafeez
    [J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18
  • [27] Urdu version of Oswestry disability index; a reliability and validity study
    Amjad, Fareeha
    Mohseni-Bandpei, Mohammad A.
    Gilani, Syed Amir
    Ahmad, Ashfaq
    Waqas, Muhammad
    Hanif, Asif
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [28] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score in patients with foot or ankle pain
    Yazici, Gokhan
    Yazici, Melek Volkan
    Bayraktar, Deniz
    Varol, Fatmagul
    Gunduz, Arzu Guclu
    Bek, Nilgun
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2020, 54 (04) : 408 - 413
  • [29] Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Neck Disability Index
    Takeshita, Katsushi
    Hosono, Noboru
    Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu
    Hasegawa, Kyoichi
    Isomura, Tatsuya
    Oshima, Yasushi
    Ono, Takashi
    Oshina, Masahito
    Oda, Takenori
    Kato, So
    Yonenobu, Kazuo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2013, 18 (01) : 14 - 21
  • [30] Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of the Foot Function Index in Patients with Foot Disorders
    Mousavian, Alireza
    Mohammadi, Ali
    Seyed-Hosseinian, Seyed-Hadi
    Shahpari, Omid
    Elahpour, Nafiseh
    Orooji, Arezoo
    Ebrahimzadeh, Mohammad H.
    Moradi, Ali
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2019, 7 (03): : 291 - 296