Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Foot and Ankle Disability Index

被引:0
|
作者
Eun, Il-Soo [1 ]
Oh, Yong Seung [1 ]
Kim, Jihoon [1 ]
Jang, Wonkyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Good Samsun Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, 326 Gayadaero, Busan 47007, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY | 2024年 / 63卷 / 01期
关键词
Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI); PROM; self-administered questionnaires; translation; validation; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.1053/j.jfas.2023.08.007
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) is one of the most commonly used tools for evaluating foot and ankle function. Due to the lack of a Korean version for properly evaluating Koreans, it was not possible to compare Korean data with data from other countries using FADI. Therefore, we created a Korean version of the FADI questionnaire and evaluated its reliability and validity. We translated the English version of FADI and FADI-sport into Korean and then back into English. The Korean version of the FADI and FADI-sport, the previously verified visual analog scale (VAS) score, and the previously validated Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-item questionnaire (SF-36) were administered to outpatients with chronic foot and ankle pain. A total of 64 patients who visited the outpatient clinic for chronic foot and ankle pain from January 2023 to March 2023 were included. To evaluate test-retest reliability and internal consistency, we used the intraclass correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha, respectively. We also assessed the concurrent and construct validity of the Korean version of FADI and FADI-sport by comparing them with the VAS and SF-36. Cronbach's alpha values were 0.953 and 0.945 for the FADI and FADI-sport, respectively, indicating good internal consistency. The reproducibility was good, and a strong correlation was observed between FADI, VAS, and SF-36. Therefore, the validation of the Korean version of the FADI was successfully performed, and it isa reliable questionnaire for self-evaluation of a patient's foot and ankle condition. (c) 2023 by the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 35
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Foot Function Index
    Huh, Jung-Wook
    Eun, Il-Soo
    Ko, Young-Chul
    Park, Man-Jun
    Hwang, Keum-Min
    Park, Sook-Hyun
    Park, Tae-hong
    Park, Joon-hyung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2016, 55 (04): : 759 - 761
  • [2] Validity and Reliability of Hindi version of Foot and Ankle Disability Index in patients with chronic recurrent lateral ankle sprain
    Popli, Aditi
    Goyal, Kanu
    Chatterjee, Subhasish
    Goyal, Manu
    [J]. FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2024, 30 (01) : 27 - 31
  • [3] Reliability and Validity of Korean Version Ankle Instability Instrument and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure
    Kim, Jin Ah
    Ha, Sangmin
    Kang, Taekyu
    Lee, Sae Yong
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2016, 48 (05): : 783 - 783
  • [4] Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for Patients With Chronic Ankle Disability
    Kulunkoglu, Bahar Anaforoglu
    Celik, Derya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2019, 58 (01): : 38 - 41
  • [5] Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Italian version of the Foot Function Index in patients with foot and ankle diseases
    Nicolò Martinelli
    Gennaro Maria Scotto
    Elena Sartorelli
    Carlo Bonifacini
    Alberto Bianchi
    Francesco Malerba
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2014, 23 : 277 - 284
  • [6] Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Italian version of the Foot Function Index in patients with foot and ankle diseases
    Martinelli, Nicolo
    Scotto, Gennaro Maria
    Sartorelli, Elena
    Bonifacini, Carlo
    Bianchi, Alberto
    Malerba, Francesco
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 (01) : 277 - 284
  • [7] Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness of the Korean Version of American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Questionnaire
    Kim, Ji-Beom
    Kim, Je Kyun
    Seo, Sang Gyo
    Lee, Dong Yeon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2015, 54 (01): : 46 - 50
  • [8] Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Pain Disability Questionnaire
    Yoon, Jisun
    Choi, Kyoung Hyo
    Kim, Tae Woo
    Yang, Seo Yon
    Sim, Mi Kyung
    [J]. ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2013, 37 (06): : 814 - 823
  • [9] Validity and reliability of a Dutch version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure
    Hanneke Weel
    Ruben Zwiers
    Donija Azim
    Inger N. Sierevelt
    Daniel Haverkamp
    C. Niek van Dijk
    Gino M. M. J. Kerkhoffs
    [J]. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2016, 24 : 1348 - 1354
  • [10] Validity and reliability of a Dutch version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure
    Weel, Hanneke
    Zwiers, Ruben
    Azim, Donija
    Sierevelt, Inger N.
    Haverkamp, Daniel
    van Dijk, C. Niek
    Kerkhoffs, Gino M. M. J.
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2016, 24 (04) : 1348 - 1354