Modeling product carbon footprint for manufacturing process

被引:17
|
作者
He, Bin [1 ]
Qian, Shusheng [1 ]
Li, Tengyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Sch Mechatron Engn & Automat, Shanghai Key Lab Intelligent Mfg & Robot, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Manufacturing process; Carbon emission; Quantitative model; Granularity decomposition; Wind turbine gearbox; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; SYSTEM; EFFICIENCY; EMISSION; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136805
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To reduce carbon intensity and improve energy efficiency in product manufacturing, a comprehensive carbon emission model is essential. Most of the existing researches focus on specific aspects of part machining and lack a quantitative model of the product manufacturing process. Therefore, this paper decomposes and evolves the carbon footprint of product manufacturing from the workshop layer, forming a systematic carbon emission quantitative model. The product manufacturing process is divided into manufacturing equipment layer, part layer, product layer and workshop layer. The sources of carbon emissions in each layer are analyzed and modeled. Finally, take a certain type of wind turbine gearbox as an example. The carbon emissions model for manufacturing process of wind turbine gearbox is established, which provides directions for carbon emission reduction of related manufacturing enterprises. The results show that the rear housing, front housing, and 1st plant carrier are the main carbon emission parts of wind turbine gearbox.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Carbon Footprint Modeling of a Clinical Lab
    Ni, Kai
    Hu, Yihua
    Ye, Xianming
    AlZubi, Hamzah S.
    Goddard, Phil
    Alkahtani, Mohammed
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (11)
  • [22] ANALYSIS OF THE CARBON FOOTPRINT FOR THE MILLING PROCESS
    Blagu, Diana Alina
    Trifan, Costan-Vladut
    Szabo, Denisa-Adela
    Dragomir, Mihai
    [J]. ACTA TECHNICA NAPOCENSIS SERIES-APPLIED MATHEMATICS MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 64 (04): : 591 - 598
  • [23] Modeling and Analysis of the Discrete Manufacturing Product Quality with Information Formation Process for Traceability
    Zhao, Xiuxu
    Zhao, Lei
    Hu, Zhixiang
    Zhou, Chuanli
    [J]. ADVANCED RESEARCH ON MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, INDUSTRY AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING III, 2013, 345 : 477 - 481
  • [24] Manufacturing process modeling
    Moctezuma-Cantoran, Isidro
    Valdes-Marrero, Manuel
    Ochoa-Somuano, Jorge
    May-Canche, Isaias
    [J]. INNOVATIONS AND ADVANCED TECHNIQUES IN COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2007, : 237 - +
  • [25] A global, scope-based carbon footprint modeling for effective carbon reduction policies: Lessons from the Turkish manufacturing
    Kucukvar, Murat
    Egilmez, Gokhan
    Onat, Nuri Cihat
    Samadi, Hamidreza
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2015, 1 : 47 - 66
  • [26] Product sustainable design for carbon footprint during product life cycle
    He, Bin
    Yu, Qianyi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2021, 32 (09) : 478 - 495
  • [27] Carbon Footprint of Silicon Photovoltaics Manufacturing in North America
    Anctil, Annick
    Farina, Angela
    Yuan, Luyao
    [J]. 2023 IEEE 50TH PHOTOVOLTAIC SPECIALISTS CONFERENCE, PVSC, 2023,
  • [28] An Estimation Method of the Carbon Footprint in Manufacturing Logistics Systems
    Qu, Xiaolong
    Li, Bo
    [J]. LTLGB 2012: PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOW-CARBON TRANSPORTATION AND LOGISTICS, AND GREEN BUILDINGS. VOL 1, 2013, : 657 - 663
  • [29] Low-carbon Modeling and Process Parameter Optimization in Laser Additive Manufacturing Process
    Jiang, Xingyu
    Liu, Ao
    Yang, Guozhe
    Liu, Weijun
    Bian, Hongyou
    Suo, Yingqi
    [J]. Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2022, 58 (05): : 223 - 238
  • [30] The Research of Carbon Footprint in the Manufacturing Supply Chain Management
    Hao, Ruyan
    Fu, Shaochuan
    [J]. LTLGB 2012: PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOW-CARBON TRANSPORTATION AND LOGISTICS, AND GREEN BUILDINGS. VOL 1, 2013, : 615 - 621