Maternal and neonatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy after in vitro fertilization

被引:5
|
作者
Zhu, Ying [1 ]
Xu, Le [1 ]
Beejadhursing, Rajluxmee [1 ]
Li, Fei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Reprod Med Ctr, Wuhan, Peoples R China
关键词
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy; In vitro fertilization; Maternal complications; Neonatal outcomes; BILE-ACIDS;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-024-06248-x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is an idiopathic disease of pregnancy. Little is known about how it specifically affects pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization (IVF). Our aim is to evaluate the impact of IVF on the perinatal outcomes of ICP.Methods A retrospective study of 242 patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, comprising 36 conceived through IVF and 206 spontaneous conceptions (SC), enrolled between 2019 and 2021 was carried out. Data were analyzed from the medical archives of the Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Tongji Hospital.Results Numerical values of transaminases (ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase) and serum total bile acid (TBA) are significantly lower in the IVF group than that in the spontaneous conceived group (p < 0.05). The incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) was higher in the IVF group than in SC group (30.6% vs. 16%, p = 0.037). The cesarean section (CS) rates are higher in the IVF group (97.2% vs. 85.4%, p = 0.023). On the other hand, the prevalence of premature rupture of membranes (PROM) was higher in the SC group (10.7%) while none was reported in the IVF-ICP group. Other maternal comorbidities and neonatal outcomes were similar between the two groups.Conclusion ICP patients who underwent IVF are more likely to suffer from GDM. Therefore, monitoring and management of blood glucose should be strengthened during pregnancy. Fortunately, IVF does not seem to worsen the progression or outlook of ICP, so sticking to standard management practices is recommended.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: An under recognised complication of maternal NAFLD?
    Phillips, Jessica
    Senaratne, Sivanthi
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 74 (03) : 751 - 752
  • [42] Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy and neonatal RDS: First evidence of a correlation
    Zecca, E
    De Luca, D
    Marras, M
    Vento, G
    Romagnoli, C
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2005, 58 (02) : 368 - 368
  • [43] First trimester maternal serum marker in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy
    Temizkan, O.
    Aydogan, B.
    Arici, B.
    Asicioglu, O.
    Yalcin, P.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 44 (04): : 595 - 598
  • [44] Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Maternal and fetal implications.
    Gonzalez, A
    Mino, M
    Fontes, J
    Suarez, JF
    Pinel, LM
    Espinosa, MD
    Miranda, JA
    MartinVivaldi, R
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 1996, 88 (11) : 780 - 784
  • [45] Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy
    Sentilhes, L.
    Bacq, Y.
    JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2008, 37 (02): : 118 - 126
  • [46] Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy
    Yilmaz, Saynur
    Ustun, Yaprak
    Hizli, Deniz
    Deveer, Ruya
    GAZI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 23 (04): : 138 - 144
  • [47] Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy
    Victoria Geenes
    Catherine Williamson
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2009, 15 (17) : 2049 - 2066
  • [48] Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy
    Jurk, Stanislaw M.
    Kremer, Andreas E.
    Schleussner, Ekkehard
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2021, 81 (08) : 940 - 947
  • [49] INTRAHEPATIC CHOLESTASIS OF PREGNANCY
    FAGAN, EA
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6964): : 1243 - 1244
  • [50] Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy
    Geenes, Victoria
    Williamson, Catherine
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 15 (17) : 2049 - 2066