Machine learning models identify predictive features of patient mortality across dementia types

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Jimmy [1 ,2 ]
Song, Luo [3 ]
Miller, Zachary [4 ]
Chan, Kwun C. G. [4 ]
Huang, Kuan-lin [1 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Icahn Inst Data Sci & Genom Technol, Tisch Canc Inst, Ctr Transformat Dis Modeling,Dept Genet & Genom Sc, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia
[4] Univ Washington, Natl Alzheimers Coordinating Ctr, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE | 2024年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
RISK-FACTORS; DIAGNOSIS; SURVIVAL; DISEASE; ASSOCIATION; PREVALENCE; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1038/s43856-024-00437-7
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundDementia care is challenging due to the divergent trajectories in disease progression and outcomes. Predictive models are needed to flag patients at risk of near-term mortality and identify factors contributing to mortality risk across different dementia types.MethodsHere, we developed machine-learning models predicting dementia patient mortality at four different survival thresholds using a dataset of 45,275 unique participants and 163,782 visit records from the U.S. National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC). We built multi-factorial XGBoost models using a small set of mortality predictors and conducted stratified analyses with dementiatype-specific models.ResultsOur models achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of over 0.82 utilizing nine parsimonious features for all 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year thresholds. The trained models mainly consisted of dementia-related predictors such as specific neuropsychological tests and were minimally affected by other age-related causes of death, e.g., stroke and cardiovascular conditions. Notably, stratified analyses revealed shared and distinct predictors of mortality across eight dementia types. Unsupervised clustering of mortality predictors grouped vascular dementia with depression and Lewy body dementia with frontotemporal lobar dementia.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility of flagging dementia patients at risk of mortality for personalized clinical management. Parsimonious machine-learning models can be used to predict dementia patient mortality with a limited set of clinical features, and dementiatype-specific models can be applied to heterogeneous dementia patient populations. Dementia has emerged as a major cause of death in societies with increasingly aging populations. However, predicting the exact timing of death in dementia cases is challenging, due to variations in the gradual process where cognitive decline interferes with the body's normal functions. In our study, we build machine-learning models to predict whether a patient diagnosed with dementia will survive or die within 1, 3, 5, or 10 years. We found that the prediction models can work well across patients from different parts of the US and across patients with different types of dementia. The key predictive factor was the information that is already used to diagnose and stage dementia, such as the results of memory tests. Interestingly, broader risk factors related to other causes of death, such as heart conditions, were less significant for predicting death in dementia patients. The ability of these models to identify dementia patients at a heightened risk of mortality could aid clinical practices, potentially allowing for earlier interventions and tailored treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes. Zhang, Song et al. develop machine-learning models to predict dementia patient mortality at one-, three-, five-, and ten-year thresholds. The models identify dementia patients at risk of mortality using a limited set of dementia-related predictors, and the stratified analyses reveal shared and distinct predictors of mortality across dementia types.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Machine learning models to predict onset of dementia: A label learning approach
    Nori, Vijay S.
    Hane, Christopher A.
    Crown, William H.
    Au, Rhoda
    Burke, William J.
    Sanghavi, Darshak M.
    Bleicher, Paul
    [J]. ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA-TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH & CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 5 (01) : 918 - 925
  • [32] MACHINE LEARNING METHODS AND PREDICTIVE MODELING TO IDENTIFY FAILURES IN THE MILITARY AIRCRAFT
    Min, Hokey
    Wood, Ryan
    Joo, Seong-Jong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2023, 30 (05): : 1273 - 1283
  • [33] Predictive Value of Machine Learning Models in Mortality of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pneumonia
    Rostami, Atefeh
    Mousavi, Faezeh
    Javadinia, Seyed Alireza
    Robatjazi, Mostafa
    Mehrpouyan, Mohammad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [34] Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Predictive Analysis of Machine Failures
    Baldovino, Renann G.
    Camacho, Ken Sammuel I.
    Chua-Unsu, Megan Victoria Hillary Y.
    Go, Jed Leonard C.
    Munsayac, Francisco Emmanuel T. Jr, III
    Bugtai, Nilo T.
    [J]. 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING, ICOM 2024, 2024, : 288 - 293
  • [35] Machine learning-based predictive models for the occurrence of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: model development and validation
    Cho, Eunhee
    Kim, Sujin
    Heo, Seok-Jae
    Shin, Jinhee
    Hwang, Sinwoo
    Kwon, Eunji
    Lee, SungHee
    Kim, SangGyun
    Kang, Bada
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [36] Machine learning-based predictive models for the occurrence of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: model development and validation
    Eunhee Cho
    Sujin Kim
    Seok-Jae Heo
    Jinhee Shin
    Sinwoo Hwang
    Eunji Kwon
    SungHee Lee
    SangGyun Kim
    Bada Kang
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 13
  • [37] Measuring Interpretability for Different Types of Machine Learning Models
    Zhou, Qing
    Liao, Fenglu
    Mou, Chao
    Wang, Ping
    [J]. TRENDS AND APPLICATIONS IN KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING: PAKDD 2018 WORKSHOPS, 2018, 11154 : 295 - 308
  • [38] Predictive maintenance: Smart sensors, machine learning, models
    Griffin, Blake
    [J]. 1600, CFE Media LLC (67): : 10 - 11
  • [39] Predictive analysis by ensemble classifier with machine learning models
    Chaya J.D.
    Usha R.N.
    [J]. International Journal of Computers and Applications, 2023, 45 (01) : 19 - 26
  • [40] Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Predictive Maintenance Applications
    Lazzaro, Alessia
    D'Addona, Doriana Marilena
    Merenda, Massimo
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SYSTEM-INTEGRATED INTELLIGENCE, SYSINT 2022, 2023, 546 : 657 - 666