An Improved DEA Prospect Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method and Its Application in Fund Performance Analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Ning, Yangxue [1 ]
Zhang, Yan [1 ]
Wang, Guoqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Engn Sci, Sch Math Phys & Stat, Shanghai 201620, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
data envelopment analysis; cross-efficiency; prospect theory; Shannon entropy; fund performance analysis; AGGREGATION; DECISION;
D O I
10.3390/math11030585
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
It is well known that a traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA) cross-efficiency evaluation model assumes that the decision-makers are completely rational, which causes the evaluation results to be inconsistent with the actual situation. To remedy this, in this paper, we propose an improved DEA prospect cross-efficiency evaluation method called EPCE model. The EPCE model captures the risk attitude of decision-makers and retains the decision information in the evaluation process. In particular, this new approach generates a more practical, realistic weighting scheme to measure the cross-efficiency and provides a reliable technique for ordering the decision-making units (DMUs) from the perspective of multi-criteria decision analysis. Finally, to demonstrate the validity and reliability of the proposed approach, we show an empirical analysis of mutual fund investment selection from Chinese fund market.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A CROSS-EFFICIENCY DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (DEA) BASED MODEL FOR MEASURING ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE
    Yang, Jing
    Li, Xianguo
    Zhou, Zhixiang
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 13 (05): : 1139 - 1146
  • [32] DEA cross-efficiency framework for efficiency evaluation with probabilistic linguistic term sets
    Pan, Ling
    Xu, Zeshui
    Ren, Peijia
    Pan, Ling (xuzeshui@263.net), 2021, Taylor and Francis Ltd. (72) : 1191 - 1206
  • [33] DEA cross-efficiency analysis considering competitive perspective and stakeholder
    Si Q.
    Ma Z.
    Liu Z.
    Xi Tong Gong Cheng Yu Dian Zi Ji Shu/Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42 (04): : 887 - 895
  • [34] Two-stage cross-efficiency evaluation based on prospect theory
    Shao, Xing
    Wang, Meiqiang
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2022, 73 (07) : 1620 - 1632
  • [35] Determination of cross-efficiency considering the original efficiency value of DMUs in DEA cross-evaluation
    Liu, Peng
    Wang, Li-Fang
    IAENG International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2019, 49 (02) : 1 - 7
  • [36] Evaluation of commercial trainer effectiveness based on DEA cross-efficiency model
    Yu Fen
    Zhang Wei-gang
    Liu Li-wen
    Xu Hang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOGISTICS, ENGINEERING, MANAGEMENT AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2014, 101 : 588 - 591
  • [37] The Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method for Energy Enterprise
    Ma Zhanxin
    Li Peng
    2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT (ICEED2010), 2011, 5 : 37 - 41
  • [38] Fuzzy cross-efficiency evaluation based on prospect theory and regret theory
    Fan, Jianping
    Tian, Ge
    Wu, Meiqin
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2023, 45 (04) : 6035 - 6045
  • [39] Slack-based ranking method: an interpretation to the cross-efficiency method in DEA
    Bao, C-P
    Chen, T-H
    Chang, S-Y
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2008, 59 (06) : 860 - 862
  • [40] DEA cross-efficiency aggregation method based upon Shannon entropy
    Wu, Jie
    Sun, Jiasen
    Liang, Liang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2012, 50 (23) : 6726 - 6736