GPTZero Performance in Identifying Artificial Intelligence-Generated Medical Texts: A Preliminary Study

被引:8
|
作者
Habibzadeh, Farrokh [1 ]
机构
[1] PIHO Polyclin, Res & Dev Unit, Eram Blvd, Shiraz 7143837877, Iran
关键词
Scientific Writing; Journalism; Artificial Intelligence; Classification; Sensitivity and Specificity;
D O I
10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e319
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: With emergence of chatbots to help authors with scientific writings, editors should have tools to identify artificial intelligence-generated texts. GPTZero is among the first websites that has sought media attention claiming to differentiate machine-generated from human-written texts.Methods: Using 20 text pieces generated by ChatGPT in response to arbitrary questions on various topics in medicine and 30 pieces chosen from previously published medical articles, the performance of GPTZero was assessed.Results: GPTZero had a sensitivity of 0.65 (95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.85); specificity, 0.90 (0.73-0.98); accuracy, 0.80 (0.66-0.90); and positive and negative likelihood ratios, 6.5 (2.1-19.9) and 0.4 (0.2-0.7), respectively.Conclusion: GPTZero has a low false-positive (classifying a human-written text as machine -generated) and a high false-negative rate (classifying a machine-generated text as human-written).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Evaluation of artificial intelligence-generated drug therapy communication skill competencies in medical education
    Sridharan, Kannan
    Sequeira, Reginald P.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2024,
  • [12] Evaluating the Diversity and Representation of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Images of Radiologists: An Observational Study
    Onuh, Ifeanyi
    Yi, Paul H.
    Bui, Molinna
    Kuckelman, Ian J.
    Anderson, Jade A.
    Ross, Andrew B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 21 (09) : 1497 - 1500
  • [13] Artificial Intelligence-Generated Draft Replies to Patient Inbox Messages
    Garcia, Patricia
    Ma, Stephen P.
    Shah, Shreya
    Smith, Margaret
    Jeong, Yejin
    Devon-Sand, Anna
    Tai-Seale, Ming
    Takazawa, Kevin
    Clutter, Danyelle
    Vogt, Kyle
    Lugtu, Carlene
    Rojo, Matthew
    Lin, Steven
    Shanafelt, Tait
    Pfeffer, Michael A.
    Sharp, Christopher
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (03)
  • [14] Artificial Intelligence-Generated Imagery: A New Approach to Art in Medicine
    Park, Benjamin
    Cooke, Erin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 21 (01) : 31 - 33
  • [15] Exploring Designer Trust in Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content: TAM/TPB Model Study
    Wang, Shao-Feng
    Chen, Chun-Ching
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (16):
  • [16] Assessing the quality of artificial intelligence-generated patient counseling for rhinosinusitis
    Hill, Gregory S.
    Fischer, Jakob L.
    Watson, Nora L.
    Riley, Charles A.
    Tolisano, Anthony M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2024,
  • [17] Artificial Intelligence-Generated and Human Expert-Designed Vocabulary Tests: A Comparative Study
    Luo Yunjiu
    Wei Wei
    Ying Zheng
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [18] Evaluation of Online Artificial Intelligence-Generated Information on Common Hand Procedures
    Crook, Bryan S.
    Park, Caroline N.
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Richard, Marc J.
    Pidgeon, Tyler S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2023, 48 (11): : 1122 - 1127
  • [19] Probabilistic Method to Fuse Artificial Intelligence-Generated Underground Utility Mapping
    Oguntoye, Kunle Sunday
    Laflamme, Simon
    Sturgill, Roy
    Martinez, Daniel A. Salazar
    Eisenmann, David J.
    Kimber, Anne
    [J]. SENSORS, 2024, 24 (11)
  • [20] Qualitative evaluation of artificial intelligence-generated weight management diet plans
    Kim, Dong Wook
    Park, Ji Seok
    Sharma, Kavita
    Velazquez, Amanda
    Li, Lu
    Ostrominski, John W.
    Tran, Tram
    Seitter Perez, Robert H.
    Shin, Jeong-Hun
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2024, 11