Comparison of Preference for Chemicals Associated with Fruit Fermentation between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila suzukii and between Virgin and Mated D. melanogaster

被引:3
|
作者
Kim, Hyemin [1 ]
Kim, YeongHo
Roh, Gwang Hyun [2 ,3 ]
Kim, Young Ho [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Dept Ecol Sci, Sangju Si 37224, Gyeongsangbuk D, South Korea
[2] Gyeongsang Natl Univ, Dept Plant Med, Jinju Si 52828, Gyeongsangnam D, South Korea
[3] Gyeongsang Natl Univ, Inst Agr & Life Sci, Jinju Si 52828, Gyeongsangnam D, South Korea
[4] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Res Inst Invertebrate Vector, Sangju Si 37224, Gyeongsangbuk D, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Drosophila melanogaster; Drosophila suzukii; chemical preference; electroantennogram; virgin; mated female; SPOTTED WING DROSOPHILA; DIPTERA DROSOPHILIDAE; MEDIATE ATTRACTION; ETHANOL; IDENTIFICATION; TOLERANCE; VOLATILES; VINEGAR; DRIVES; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/insects14040382
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Simple Summary Different species of Drosophila show evolutionary specializations in host preference, habitat choice, and morphology. Therefore, the selection of different species belonging to the Drosophila genus is advantageous for understanding evolutionary adaptations to certain environments. In particular, two taxonomically close species, Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila suzukii, are known to have distinct habitats; D. melanogaster is mostly found near overripe, decaying, abandoned, and fermented fruits, whereas D. suzukii is attracted to fresh fruits. The infection of microorganisms promotes fruit fermentation accompanied by the production of large amounts of chemicals. Therefore, chemical concentrations are typically higher in fermented fruits than in fresh fruits. Considering the distinct habitats of the two flies, D. melanogaster and D. suzukii are thought to be more attracted to high and low concentrations of chemicals, respectively. In this study, Y-tube olfactometer and electroantennogram assays revealed that D. melanogaster had a higher preference for relatively high concentrations of 2-phenylethanol, ethanol, and acetic acid than that of D. suzukii. In the comparison between virgin and mated females of D. melanogaster, mated flies were more attracted to high concentrations of chemicals than virgin flies. These results suggest that high concentrations of chemicals are an important attraction factor for D. melanogaster seeking appropriate sites for oviposition. Two taxonomically similar Drosophila species, Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila suzukii, are known to have distinct habitats: D. melanogaster is mostly found near overripe and fermented fruits, whereas D. suzukii is attracted to fresh fruits. Since chemical concentrations are typically higher in overripe and fermented fruits than in fresh fruits, D. melanogaster is hypothesized to be attracted to higher concentrations of volatiles than D. suzukii. Therefore, the chemical preferences of the two flies were compared via Y-tube olfactometer assays and electroantennogram (EAG) experiments using various concentrations of 2-phenylethanol, ethanol, and acetic acid. D. melanogaster exhibited a higher preference for high concentrations of all the chemicals than that of D. suzukii. In particular, since acetic acid is mostly produced at the late stage of fruit fermentation, the EAG signal distance to acetic acid between the two flies was higher than those to 2-phenylethanol and ethanol. This supports the hypothesis that D. melanogaster prefers fermented fruits compared to D. suzukii. When comparing virgin and mated female D. melanogaster, mated females showed a higher preference for high concentrations of chemicals than that of virgin females. In conclusion, high concentrations of volatiles are important attraction factors for mated females seeking appropriate sites for oviposition.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sexual Isolation Between Drosophila Melanogaster, D. Simulans and D. Mauritiana: Sex and Species Specific Discrimination
    Maria C. Carracedo
    Carmen Suarez
    Pelayo Casares
    Genetica, 2000, 108 : 155 - 162
  • [22] Evolution and genetics of accessory gland transcriptome divergence between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans
    Majane, Alex C.
    Cridland, Julie M.
    Blair, Logan K.
    Begun, David J.
    GENETICS, 2024, 227 (02)
  • [23] Loss of notum macrochaetae as an interspecific hybrid anomaly between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans
    Takano, TS
    GENETICS, 1998, 149 (03) : 1435 - 1450
  • [24] The polytene dot chromosome of Drosophila: D. melanogaster and D. subobscura
    Anja O. Saura
    Juan B. Cuenca
    Tapio I. Heino
    Rosa de Frutos
    Veikko Sorsa
    Chromosoma, 2002, 111 : 273 - 283
  • [25] Chromosomal Homologies Between Drosophila Melanogaster and D. Funebris Determined By In-Situ Hybridization
    P. Gallego
    E. Juan
    M. Papaceit
    Chromosome Research, 1999, 7 : 331 - 339
  • [26] Olfactory Preference of Drosophila suzukii Shifts between Fruit and Fermentation Cues over the Season: Effects of Physiological Status
    Clymans, Rik
    Van Kerckvoorde, Vincent
    Bangels, Eva
    Akkermans, Wannes
    Alhmedi, Ammar
    De Clercq, Patrick
    Belien, Tim
    Bylemans, Dany
    INSECTS, 2019, 10 (07)
  • [27] REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION BETWEEN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER AND D PSEUDOOBSCURA
    VANVALEN, L
    EHRMAN, L
    EVOLUTION, 1962, 16 (04) : 528 - &
  • [28] Viability interactions between chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans
    Pontecorvo, G
    JOURNAL OF GENETICS, 1943, 45 (01) : 51 - 66
  • [29] Genetics of postmating isolation between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans
    Sawamura, Kyoichi
    GENES & GENETIC SYSTEMS, 2010, 85 (06) : 452 - 452
  • [30] Development of gonads in hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans
    Kerkis, J
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY, 1933, 66 (03): : 477 - 509