Prioritization of habitat construction materials on Mars based on multi-criteria decision-making

被引:3
|
作者
Iranfar, Soha [1 ,2 ]
Karbala, Mohammad Mehdi [3 ]
Shahsavari, Mohammad Hossein [4 ]
Vandeginste, Veerle [5 ]
机构
[1] Petr Univ Technol PUT, Abadan Fac Petr, Dept Petr Engn, Abadan, Iran
[2] Yazd Univ, Dept Min & Met Engn, Yazd, Iran
[3] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Sch Engn, Rock Mech Div, Tehran, Iran
[4] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Tehran Polytech, Hafez Ave, Tehran, Iran
[5] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Mat Engn, Campus Bruges, B-8200 Brugge, Belgium
来源
关键词
Building materials; Space habitat construction; Martian concrete; MCDM; FUZZY AHP; PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES; SULFUR CONCRETE; MCDM METHODS; LUNAR; GEOPOLYMER; MAGNESIUM; EXPLORATION; RADIATION; SIMULANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2023.105864
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Mars is the most accessible planet in the solar system for habitation and could serve as a base for exploring more distant planets. Space agencies and scientists worldwide continue exploring Mars to gain more geologic and atmospheric information in preparation for constructing space habitats. The harsh planetary conditions of Mars require the development of new or modified methods for building infrastructure and formulating binders. Each type of concrete has advantages and dis-advantages, and we need to find the best binder for use in construction on Mars.In this study, eight construction materials, including Ordinary Portland cement (OPC), sulfur concrete, geopolymer, sintered material, polymer-bound regolith, products of geo-thermite re-actions, regolith-based magnesium oxychloride, and microbial-induced calcite precipitation, are reviewed according to 14 criteria. The criteria are availability, shipping, water requirement, technical working conditions, curing time, temperature, total required energy, strength, dura-bility, cosmic radiation shield (density and hydrogen content), additives needed, sustainability, safety, and recyclability. We applied the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach to assign a weighting to each criterion. Finally, we used three multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods to determine the most suitable mortar for construction under the harsh con-ditions on Mars.The results show that if the general conditions of Mars are considered uniform such as different temperatures and geologies dependent on location, geopolymer concrete is the best material for construction based on Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR), and Weighted Aggregates Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) methods, and sintered material concrete and sulfur concrete are equally ranked second. Correspondingly, five concretes of Portland cement, products of geo-thermite reactions, regolith-based magnesium oxychloride, polymer-bound regolith, and microbial-induced calcite precipitation are the most efficient construction materials, respectively. In addition, using the Fuzzy AHP method, the criteria of shipping and sustainability have the highest and lowest weighting, respectively, in the decision-making process. The use of MCDM methods and inductive analysis provides a scientific approach that enables the comparison of the potential of several space concrete materials for better decision making in future research and construction within the next 10-20 years.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INTEGRITY MITIGATION PRIORITIZATION USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    Mehranfer, Mahsa
    Mejia, Juan
    Hassanien, Sherif
    Martin, James
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, 2019, VOL 7, 2019,
  • [2] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    [J]. MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [3] Flood prioritization based on fuzzy best worse multi-criteria decision-making method
    Sarita Gajbhiye Meshram
    Ali Reza Ilderomi
    Mehdi Sepehri
    Celso Augusto Guimarães Santos
    [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2022, 15 (16)
  • [4] Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach to prioritization of space debris for removal
    Bazzocchi, Michael C. F.
    Miguel Sanchez-Lozano, Juan
    Hakima, Houman
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2021, 67 (03) : 1155 - 1173
  • [5] Structure of multi-criteria decision-making
    Brugha, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2004, 55 (11) : 1156 - 1168
  • [6] SUBJECTIVE MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    ESHRAGH, F
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MAN-MACHINE STUDIES, 1980, 13 (01): : 117 - 141
  • [7] Multiclass Classification Based on Multi-criteria Decision-making
    Baloochian, Hossein
    Ghaffary, Hamid Reza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLASSIFICATION, 2019, 36 (01) : 140 - 151
  • [8] Multiclass Classification Based on Multi-criteria Decision-making
    Hossein Baloochian
    Hamid Reza Ghaffary
    [J]. Journal of Classification, 2019, 36 : 140 - 151
  • [9] Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Technique
    Rauf, Mudassar
    Guan, Zailin
    Sarfraz, Shoaib
    Mumtaz, Jabir
    Almaiman, Sulaiman
    Shehab, Essam
    Jahanzaib, Mirza
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY XXXII, 2018, 8 : 343 - 348
  • [10] A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for construction contractor prequalification
    Nieto-Morote, Ana
    Ruz-Vila, Francisco
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 25 : 8 - 19