2D and 3D Wear Analysis of 3D Printed and Prefabricated Artificial Teeth

被引:8
|
作者
Al Saadi, Amna S. [1 ]
El-Damanhoury, Hatem M. [1 ]
Khalifa, Nadia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sharjah, Dept Prevent & Restorat Dent, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[2] Univ Sharjah, Dept Prevent & Restorat Dent, POB 27272, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
关键词
  Wear; Resistance; Artificial denture teeth; NANOFILLED COMPOSITE RESIN; DENTURE TEETH; 2-BODY WEAR; RESISTANCE; RESTORATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.identj.2022.10.002
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aimed to assess the 3-body wear of prefabricated and 3D-printed artifi-cial denture teeth.Materials and methods: Four groups of artificial teeth were used; 3D-printed polymethylmetha-crylate (PMMA) teeth (PR) and 3 prefabricated commercially available denture teeth: PMMA (Gnathostar, GN), PMMA (SR Orthotyp PE, SR), and Nanohybrid composite (SR Phonares NHC, PH). The 3-body wear test was performed using a steatite ceramic antagonist in a chewing sim-ulator with 750,000 cycles, temperature 23 +/- 2 8C, and force of 50 N. The abrasive medium was composed of ground millet seeds and white rice mixed with distilled water. The teeth were 3D -scanned before and after the wear test. The 3D images were assessed for teeth wear by measur-ing the volumetric (3D wear) and the vertical (2D wear) substance loss. The one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey post hoc test was used to statistically obtain the data analysis.Results: Maximum 3D wear was observed in the PR (51.05 +/- 4.53 mm3), followed by GN (20.22 +/- 6.29 mm3) and SR (12.12 +/- 6.29 mm3) artificial teeth. Minimum wear occurred in the PH teeth (6.24 +/- 0.87 mm3). The analytical differences amongst the groups were statisti-cally significant (P < .05) except between PH and SR teeth. For 2D wear measurement, the maximum was seen in the GN teeth (6.29 +/- 1.64 mm), followed by PR (5.04 +/- 0.83 mm) and then SR (4.53 +/- 0.87 mm). The PH teeth (3.09 +/- 0.68 mm) again showed minimum wear. Sta-tistically, amongst the groups, the major observable differences (P < .05) were between PH and GN, PH and PR, and SR and GN. Conclusions: Composite resin teeth had a greater wear resistance than acrylic resin teeth and 3D-printed resin teeth, both of which were comparable. Due to the advancement of digital workflows, manufacturers should devote effort to enhancing 3D-printed teeth. (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of FDI World Dental Federation. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 92
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] 2D/3D AudioVisual Content Analysis & Description
    Pitas, I.
    Papachristou, K.
    Nikolaidis, N.
    Liuni, M.
    Benaroya, L.
    Peeters, G.
    Roebel, A.
    Linnemann, A.
    Liu, M.
    Gerke, S.
    [J]. 2014 IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MULTIMEDIA SIGNAL PROCESSING (MMSP), 2014,
  • [42] Nanoparticle superlattices in 2D and 3D
    Schatz, George
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 254
  • [43] 3D IMAGES WITH 2D FOOTPRINT
    Ferre Ferri, Enrique
    [J]. REVISTA SONDA-INVESTIGACION Y DOCENCIA EN ARTES Y LETRAS, 2020, (09): : 73 - 82
  • [44] The Overview of 2D to 3D Conversion
    Deng, Qingqing
    Zhang, Yue
    Li, Shaobin
    [J]. 2013 IEEE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONICS INFORMATION AND EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION (ICEIEC), 2014, : 226 - 229
  • [45] 3D Experience on a 2D Display
    Srinath, Raghunandan
    Aishwarya, P.
    Suman, B.
    Ramgopichand, V. N.
    Surabhi, N.
    [J]. 2021 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATICS (ICCCI), 2021,
  • [46] A pathway from 3D to 2D
    Fichthorn K.
    [J]. Nature Materials, 2019, 18 (09) : 911 - 912
  • [47] 2D to 3D: Raising the stakes
    [J]. CAE, Computer-Aided Engineering, 2000, 19 (04):
  • [48] Discretization in 2D and 3D orders
    Couprie, M
    Bertrand, G
    Kenmochi, Y
    [J]. GRAPHICAL MODELS, 2003, 65 (1-3) : 77 - 91
  • [49] Integrated 2D and 3D mammography
    Sumkin, Jules H.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (08): : E292 - E293
  • [50] Comparing 2D and 3D Imaging
    Ballantyne, Lauren
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISUAL COMMUNICATION IN MEDICINE, 2011, 34 (03) : 138 - 141