Evaluation of pharmacokinetic interactions between lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin in healthy subjects

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Heeyoung [1 ]
Kim, Choon Ok [1 ]
Park, Hyeonsoo [1 ]
Park, Min Soo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kim, Dasohm [1 ]
Hong, Taegon [1 ]
Shin, Yesong [1 ]
Jin, Byung Hak [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Severance Hosp, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med & Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Med & Regulatory Sci, Incheon 21983, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Seoul 03722, South Korea
关键词
Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Interactions; Pharmacokinetics; Thiazolidinediones; ACTIVATED RECEPTOR-GAMMA; DRUG-DRUG INTERACTION; CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS; SGLT2; INHIBITOR; DAPAGLIFLOZIN; PIOGLITAZONE; MANAGEMENT; AGONIST;
D O I
10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e4
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Concomitant administration of lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin is expected to enhance blood glucose-lowering effects and improve medication compliance in patients with diabetes mellitus. In this study, we investigated the pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions and safety of lobeglitazone and co-administered empagliflozin and metformin, which are approved agents used in clinical settings. Two randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover clinical trials (parts 1 and 2) were conducted independently. In part 1, lobeglitazone monotherapy or lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin triple therapy was administered for 5 days. In part 2, empagliflozin and metformin dual therapy or the abovementioned triple therapy were administered for 5 days. Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the last dose in each period for PK evaluation. The primary PK parameters (AUC(tau,ss), C-max,C-ss) of treatment regimens in each study part were calculated and compared. For lobeglitazone, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with 90% confidence intervals (CI) for triple therapy over monotherapy were 1.08 (1.03-1.14) for C-max,C-ss and 0.98 (0.90-1.07) for AUC(tau,ss). For empagliflozin, the GMRs and 90% CIs for triple therapy over dual therapy were 0.87 (0.78-0.97) for C-max,C-ss and 0.97 (0.93-1.00) for AUC(tau,ss). For metformin, the GMRs and 90% CIs for triple therapy over dual therapy were 1.06 (0.95-1.17) for C-max,C-ss and 1.04 (0.97-1.12) for AUC(tau,ss). All reported adverse events were mild. The triple therapy consisting of lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin did not show any clinically relevant drug interactions in relation to the PKs and safety of each drug substance.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 68
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Imeglimin Does Not Induce Clinically Relevant Pharmacokinetic Interactions When Combined with Either Metformin or Sitagliptin in Healthy Subjects
    Fouqueray, Pascale
    Perrimond-Dauchy, Sandrine
    Bolze, Sebastien
    CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2020, 59 (10) : 1261 - 1271
  • [32] No Relevant Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Between the Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitor Empagliflozin and Lobeglitazone, a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ Agonist, in Healthy Subjects
    Kim, Yu Kyong
    Hwang, Jun Gi
    Park, Min Kyu
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2021, 15 : 1725 - 1734
  • [33] Safety and pharmacokinetic interaction between fotagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, and metformin in healthy subjects
    Ding, Yanhua
    Zhang, Hong
    Li, Cuiyun
    Zheng, WenBo
    Wang, Meng
    Li, Ying
    Sun, HaiGang
    Wu, Min
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY, 2021, 17 (06) : 725 - 731
  • [34] An Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Lobeglitazone and Sitagliptin After Multiple Oral Administrations in Healthy Men
    Moon, Seol Ju
    Yu, Kyung-Sang
    Kim, Min-Gul
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 42 (06) : 1047 - 1057
  • [35] Investigation of Potential Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Selexipag and Warfarin in Healthy Male Subjects
    Bruderer, Shirin
    Okubo, Kaori
    Mukai, Hideya
    Mant, Tim
    Dingemanse, Jasper
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 38 (05) : 1228 - 1236
  • [36] No pharmacokinetic interactions between candesartan and amlodipine following multiple oral administrations in healthy subjects
    Kim, Jung-Ryul
    Kim, Seokuee
    Huh, Wooseong
    Ko, Jae-Wook
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2018, 12 : 2475 - 2483
  • [37] Pharmacokinetic Interactions between Primaquine and Pyronaridine-Artesunate in Healthy Adult Thai Subjects
    Jittamala, Podjanee
    Pukrittayakamee, Sasithon
    Ashley, Elizabeth A.
    Nosten, Francois
    Hanboonkunupakarn, Borimas
    Lee, Sue J.
    Thana, Praiya
    Chairat, Kalayanee
    Blessborn, Daniel
    Panapipat, Salwaluk
    White, Nicholas J.
    Day, Nicholas P. J.
    Tarning, Joel
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2015, 59 (01) : 505 - 513
  • [38] Lack of Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Macitentan and a Combined Oral Contraceptive in Healthy Female Subjects
    Hurst, Noemie
    Pellek, Matthias
    Dingemanse, Jasper
    Sidharta, Patricia N.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 56 (06): : 669 - 674
  • [39] Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Tegoprazan and Naproxen, Aceclofenac, and Celecoxib in Healthy Korean Male Subjects
    Moon, Seol Ju
    Shin, Naree
    Kang, MinJa
    Kim, Bongtae
    Kim, Min-Gul
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 44 (07) : 930 - +
  • [40] Evaluation of a Pharmacokinetic Interaction between Telmisartan and Chlorthalidone in Healthy Male Adult Subjects
    Seong, Sook Jin
    Lim, Mi-sun
    Lee, Joomi
    Ohk, Boram
    Gwon, Mi-Ri
    Kim, Bo Kyung
    Kim, Hyun-Ju
    Yang, Dong Heon
    Lee, Hae Won
    Kang, Woo Youl
    Yoon, Young-Ran
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2016, 36 (08) : 613 - 623