Mobile Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review

被引:2
|
作者
Naveed, Quadri Noorulhasan [1 ]
Choudhary, Heena [2 ]
Ahmad, Naim [1 ]
Alqahtani, Jarallah [3 ]
Qahmash, Adel Ibrahim [4 ]
机构
[1] King Khalid Univ, Coll Comp Sci, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia
[2] Malaviya Natl Inst Technol Jaipur, Dept Humanities & Social Sci, Jaipur 302017, India
[3] Najran Univ, Coll Comp Sci & Informat Syst, Najran 66462, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Khalid Univ, Coll Educ, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia
关键词
research gaps in mobile learning; PRISMA framework; TCCM; (Theory; Context; Characteristics; Methods); framework; human computer interaction; technology enhanced learning transformation; BEHAVIORAL INTENTION; UNIVERSITY-STUDENTS; SUCCESS FACTORS; ADOPTION; ACCEPTANCE; READINESS; FRAMEWORK; CONTEXT; USAGE; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.3390/su151813566
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mobile learning (M-Learning) has become a popular and effective method of education that leverages the ubiquity of mobile devices. M-Learning has digitally transformed the process of teaching and learning. It has tremendous potential to empower all sections of society through education and training. This study presents a systematic literature review of M-Learning. The articles were retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science databases. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, a final selection of 161 articles published between 2016 and 2022 was included in the review. To analyze the articles, the researchers employed the TCCM (Theory, Context, Characteristics, Methods) framework, which facilitated addressing the research questions. This review identified various theories, such as behaviorism, constructivism, cognitivism, situated learning, problem-based learning, context awareness learning, socio-cultural theory, collaborative learning, conversational learning, lifelong learning, informal learning, activity theory, connectivism, navigation, and location-based learning, that are used to support and guide the implementation of M-Learning. In terms of context, developing countries contributed to 70.8% of the studies, while developed countries contributed to 29.1%. Further, a majority of the studies, 93%, involved students followed by faculty members and only two studies involved staff from higher education management. A total of 19 unique characteristic factors have been identified, such as personal, intention, attitude, usage, utility, ease of use, learnability, social, technological, pedagogical, anxiety, enjoyment, accessibility, knowledge, experience, trust, price, and habit. A quantitative research design was used in 90% of the studies, followed by mixed methods research design in 7% of the studies, and qualitative research design in only 3% of the studies. Further, this article synthesizes previous research findings and highlights gaps for future research. Overall, this review contributes to the understanding and advancement of M-Learning as a valuable educational platform.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Features, barriers, and influencing factors of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review
    Sophonhiranrak, Samoekan
    [J]. HELIYON, 2021, 7 (04)
  • [22] AI in higher education: a systematic literature review
    Castillo-Martinez, Isolda Margarita
    Flores-Bueno, Daniel
    Gomez-Puente, Sonia M.
    Vite-Leon, Victor O.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2024, 9
  • [23] Mobile learning in higher education: A bibliometric review
    Sobral S.R.
    [J]. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 2020, 14 (11) : 153 - 170
  • [24] Podcasting in higher education as a component of Universal Design for Learning: A systematic review of the literature
    Gunderson, Jamie L.
    Cumming, Therese M.
    [J]. INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 60 (04) : 591 - 601
  • [25] Adoption of E-Learning at Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review
    Awan, Rushna Khalil
    Afshan, Gul
    Memon, Atia Bano
    [J]. MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR EDUCATION SOCIAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 8 (02): : 74 - 91
  • [26] Learning Analytics Methods, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review
    Avella, John T.
    Kebritchi, Mansureh
    Nunn, Sandra G.
    Kanai, Therese
    [J]. ONLINE LEARNING, 2016, 20 (02): : 13 - 29
  • [27] Digital Competence Learning Ecosystem in Higher Education: A Mapping and Systematic Review of the Literature
    Bojorquez-Roque, Maylin Suleny
    Garcia-Cabot, Antonio
    Garcia-Lopez, Eva
    Oliva-Cordova, Luis Magdiel
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 87596 - 87614
  • [28] Learning Analytics to Support the Provision of Feedback in Higher Education: a Systematic Literature Review
    Nunez Avila, Ana-Gabriela
    Francisco Silva Feraud, Ivan
    Damian Solano-Quinde, Lizandro
    Zuniga-Prieto, Miguel
    Echeverria, Vanessa
    De Laet, Tinne
    [J]. 2022 XVII LATIN AMERICAN CONFERENCE ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES (LACLO 2022), 2022, : 163 - 170
  • [29] e-Learning quality assessment in Higher Education: A systematic literature review
    Ortiz-Lopez, Alberto
    Olmos-Miguelanez, Susana
    Carlos Sanchez-Prieto, Jose
    [J]. EDUCATION IN THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY, 2022, 23
  • [30] Mobile learning for preschoolers: a systematic literature review
    Goundar, Munil Shiva
    Kumar, Bimal Aklesh
    Chand, Sailesh Saras
    Chand, Ronil
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOBILE LEARNING AND ORGANISATION, 2023, 17 (1-2) : 303 - 320