Driver eye glance behavior and performance with camera-based visibility systems versus mirrors

被引:0
|
作者
Mazzae, E. N. [1 ,3 ]
Satterfield, K. S. [2 ]
Baldwin, G. H. S. [2 ]
Skuce, I. A. [2 ]
Andrella, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Highway Traff Safety Adm, Vehicle Safety Res, Washington, DC USA
[2] Transportat Res Ctr Inc, East Liberty, OH USA
[3] Natl Highway Traff Safety Adm, Vehicle Res & Test Ctr, Vehicle Safety Res, Bldg 60,10820 State Route 347, East Liberty, OH 43319 USA
关键词
Visibility; mirrors; rearview; camera; crash avoidance;
D O I
10.1080/15389588.2022.2155049
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective Drivers' ability to extract visual information efficiently from mirrors or camera-based visibility systems impacts driving performance when carrying out maneuvers such as lane changes. The objective of the research was to compare drivers' eye gaze behavior and driving performance with mirrors versus camera-based visibility systems (i.e., CMS, or camera monitor system) to identify any differences and possible impacts on safety. Methods A test track study was conducted comparing drivers' eye gaze and lane change behavior when driving a vehicle equipped with outside mirrors versus a prototype CMS. Participants' opinions regarding usability and comfort in using mirrors versus the tested CMS were also obtained using a post-drive questionnaire. Results Study results were somewhat mixed but did demonstrate that with the tested CMS, participants took longer to pass a slower moving vehicle and maintained a greater resultant distance from the passed vehicle. Additionally, participants had a greater number of fixations to the CMS displays compared to the outside rearview mirrors. Results also found slight perceived advantages for the tested CMS in regard to ease of use, comfortability, and visibility. When asked to choose which rear visibility technology they would prefer to use in everyday driving, most participants preferred the outside rearview mirrors over the tested prototype CMS or having both systems. However, not all lane change and gaze metrics followed the same pattern. Conclusions In this study, participants' longer time to pass a slower moving vehicle, greater distance when passing a slower moving vehicle, greater number of fixations, and lower subjective ratings with the tested CMS may indicate difficulty in judging distances and focusing on the electronic image. This study provides preliminary findings that suggest differences in driving behavior exist between a single tested prototype CMS and outside rearview mirrors and is a foundational step toward evaluating whether these trends are consistent across different systems and overall implications for safe driving behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:S94 / S99
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Camera-based Drowsiness Reference for Driver State Classification under Real Driving Conditions
    Friedrichs, Fabian
    Yang, Bin
    2010 IEEE INTELLIGENT VEHICLES SYMPOSIUM (IV), 2010, : 101 - 106
  • [43] Evaluating the effectiveness of camera-based fatigue detection technology in a rural truck driver cohort
    Cori, Jennifer
    Booker, Lauren
    Sletten, Tracey
    Rajaratnam, Shantha
    Singh, Bikram
    Stanley, David
    Francis, Liam
    McMahon, Kayla
    Wilson, Kyle
    Mulhall, Megan
    Howard, Mark
    JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH, 2024, 33
  • [44] Dynamic performance verification of the Redzinski Bridge using portable camera-based vibration monitoring systems
    Bocian, Mateusz
    Nikitas, Nikolaos
    Kalybek, Maksat
    Kuzawa, Mieszko
    Hawryszkow, Pawel
    Bien, Jan
    Onysyk, Jerzy
    Biliszczuk, Jan
    ARCHIVES OF CIVIL AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [45] Three Ways to Improve the Performance of Real-Life Camera-Based Fall Detection Systems
    Debard, Glen
    Mertens, Marc
    Goedeme, Toon
    Tuytelaars, Tinne
    Vanrumste, Bart
    JOURNAL OF SENSORS, 2017, 2017
  • [46] Estimation of Lead Vehicle Kinematics Using Camera-Based Data for Driver Distraction Detection
    Feng F.
    Bao S.
    Jin J.
    Sun W.
    Saigusa S.
    Tahmasbi-Sarvestani A.
    Dsa J.
    International Journal of Automotive Engineering, 2018, 9 (03) : 158 - 164
  • [47] Raindrops on the Windshield: Performance Assessment of Camera-based Object Detection
    Hasirlioglu, Sinan
    Reway, Fabio
    Klingenberg, Tim
    Riener, Andreas
    Huber, Werner
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF VEHICULAR ELECTRONICS AND SAFETY (ICVES 19), 2019,
  • [48] New methods of testing camera-based lighting assistance systems
    Bogdanow S.
    Marutzky M.
    Zschoppe R.
    Voigt U.
    AutoTechnology, 2011, 11 (05): : 22 - 27
  • [49] Assessment of two camera-based systems for monitoring arboreal wildlife
    Brooks, RT
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 1996, 24 (02) : 298 - 300
  • [50] Interval Image Abstraction for Verification of Camera-Based Autonomous Systems
    Habeeb, P.
    D'Souza, Deepak
    Lodaya, Kamal
    Prabhakar, Pavithra
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, 2024, 43 (11) : 4310 - 4321