Breaking Bias: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Clinical Decision-Making

被引:23
|
作者
Brown, Chris [1 ]
Nazeer, Rayiz [1 ]
Gibbs, Austin [2 ]
Le Page, Pierre [2 ]
Mitchell, Andrew R. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Jersey Gen Hosp, Internal Med, St Helier, England
[2] Jersey Gen Hosp, Cardiol, St Helier, England
关键词
human factors; chatgpt; medical errors; cognitive bias; clinical artificial intelligence; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.36415
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This case report reflects on a delayed diagnosis for a 27-year-old woman who reported chest pain and shortness of breath to the emergency department. The treating clinician reflects upon how cognitive biases influenced their diagnostic process and how multiple missed opportunities resulted in missteps. Using artificial intelligence (AI) tools for clinical decision-making, we suggest how AI could augment the clinician, and in this case, delayed diagnosis avoided. Incorporating AI tools into clinical decision-making brings potential benefits, including improved diagnostic accuracy and addressing human factors contributing to medical errors. For example, they may support a real-time interpretation of medical imaging and assist clinicians in generating a differential diagnosis in ensuring that critical diagnoses are considered. However, it is vital to be aware of the potential pitfalls associated with the use of AI, such as automation bias, input data quality issues, limited clinician training in interpreting AI methods, and the legal and ethical considerations associated with their use. The report draws attention to the utility of AI clinical decision-support tools in overcoming human cognitive biases. It also emphasizes the importance of clinicians developing skills needed to steward the adoption of AI tools in healthcare and serve as patient advocates, ensuring safe and effective use of health data.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Recognizing Heuristics and Bias in Clinical Decision-making
    Hughes, Tasha M.
    Dossett, Lesly A.
    Hawley, Sarah T.
    Telem, Dana A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 271 (05) : 813 - 814
  • [32] ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DECISION-MAKING FOR VESTIBULAR SCHWANNOMA SURGERY
    Risbud, Adwight
    Tsutsumi, Kotaro
    Abouzari, Mehdi
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2022, 43 (01) : E131 - E132
  • [33] Applicability of Artificial Intelligence in Decision-Making for Land Forces
    Tudorache, Paul
    [J]. VOJENSKE ROZHLEDY-CZECH MILITARY REVIEW, 2021, 30 (02): : 39 - 54
  • [34] Application of artificial intelligence in jurisdictional decision-making (Spain)
    Jimenez Cardona, Noemi
    [J]. QUAESTIO IURIS, 2023, 16 (03): : 1612 - 1630
  • [35] Decision-making in tunneling using artificial intelligence tools
    Mahmoodzadeh, Arsalan
    Mohammadi, Mokhtar
    Daraei, Ako
    Faraj, Rabar H.
    Omer, Rebaz Mohammed Dler
    Sherwani, Aryan Far H.
    [J]. TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 103
  • [36] Integrating intuition and artificial intelligence in organizational decision-making
    Vincent, Vinod U.
    [J]. BUSINESS HORIZONS, 2021, 64 (04) : 425 - 438
  • [37] Organizational Decision-Making Structures in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
    Shrestha, Yash Raj
    Ben-Menahem, Shiko M.
    von Krogh, Georg
    [J]. CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2019, 61 (04) : 66 - 83
  • [38] Artificial Intelligence and Patient-Centered Decision-Making
    Bjerring J.C.
    Busch J.
    [J]. Philosophy & Technology, 2021, 34 (2) : 349 - 371
  • [39] Substation decision-making platform based on artificial intelligence
    Qin, Jianhua
    Zhu, Xueqiong
    Wang, Zhen
    Ma, Jingtan
    Gao, Shan
    Hu, Chengbo
    [J]. Distributed Generation and Alternative Energy Journal, 2020, 35 (02): : 151 - 172
  • [40] Algorithms and Influence Artificial Intelligence and Crisis Decision-Making
    Horowitz, Michael C.
    Lin-Greenberg, Erik
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2022, 66 (04)