Association between ultra-processed food consumption and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies

被引:2
|
作者
Shu, Long [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoyan [1 ]
Zhu, Qin [1 ,2 ]
Lv, Xiaoling [3 ,4 ]
Si, Caijuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Hosp, Dept Nutr, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Hosp, Dept Digest, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Hosp, Dept Geriatr, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Geriatr Inst Zhejiang Prov, Zhejiang Prov Key Lab Geriatr, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION | 2023年 / 10卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ultra-processed food; nova; breast cancer; meta-analysis; systematic review; AMERICAN; DRINKS; RATIO;
D O I
10.3389/fnut.2023.1250361
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: Some epidemiological studies have examined the association between consumption of ultra-processed food (UPF) and the risk of breast cancer. However, the results were inconsistent. Therefore, we carried out a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis to examine whether an association exists between high consumption of UPF and breast cancer risk. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, EBSCO and CNKI databases were systematically searched from inception to May 2023. The summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) associated with UPF consumption and breast cancer were calculated using a random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird method). Heterogeneity between included studies was examined using the Cochran's Q test and I-square (I-2) statistics. Publication bias was studied by visual inspection of funnel plot asymmetry and Begg's and Egger's tests. Results: Overall, six articles involving 462,292 participants, were eligible to be included in this study. Compared to the lowest consumption, highest consumption of UPF was related to a higher risk of breast cancer (RR = 1.10; 95%CI: 1.00-1.22, p = 0.056). Besides, the linear dose-response analysis showed that each 10% increment in UPF consumption was related to a 5% higher risk of breast cancer (RR = 1.05; 95%CI: 1.00-1.10, p = 0.048). Subgroup analyses suggested that UPF consumption was positively associated with breast cancer risk in case-control studies (RR = 1.13; 95%CI: 1.01-1.26, p = 0.028). Additionally, there was also a significant positive association between UPF consumption and breast cancer risk in the subgroup with sample size<5,000(RR = 1.17; 95%CI: 1.02-1.35, p = 0.028). Conclusion: Our results indicate that higher consumption of UPF is slightly related to a higher risk of breast cancer. Further studies in particular of large prospective cohort studies are warranted to confirm these results.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cholesterol consumption and risk of endometrial cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies
    Gong, Ting-Ting
    Li, Da
    Wu, Qi-Jun
    Wang, Ya-Zhu
    [J]. ONCOTARGET, 2016, 7 (13) : 16996 - 17008
  • [22] Isoflavone consumption and risk of breast cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies
    Xie, Qi
    Chen, Ming-Liang
    Qin, Yu
    Zhang, Qian-Yong
    Xu, Hong-Xia
    Zhou, Yong
    Mi, Man-Tian
    Zhu, Jun-Dong
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2013, 22 (01) : 118 - 127
  • [23] The association of ultra-processed food consumption with adult mental health disorders: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of 260,385 participants
    Mazloomi, Seyadeh Narges
    Talebi, Sepide
    Mehrabani, Sanaz
    Bagheri, Reza
    Ghavami, Abed
    Zarpoosh, Mahsa
    Mohammadi, Hamed
    Wong, Alexei
    Nordvall, Michael
    Kermani, Mohammad Ali Hojjati
    Moradi, Sajjad
    [J]. NUTRITIONAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 26 (10) : 913 - 931
  • [24] Olive oil and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies
    Sealy, Naria
    Hankinson, Susan E.
    Houghton, Serena C.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2021, 125 (10) : 1148 - 1156
  • [25] The association of ultra-processed food intake with neurodegenerative disorders: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of large-scale cohorts
    Pourmotabbed, Ali
    Talebi, Sepide
    Mehrabani, Sanaz
    Babaei, Atefeh
    Khosroshahi, Reza Amiri
    Bagheri, Reza
    Wong, Alexei
    Ghoreishy, Seyed Mojtaba
    Amirian, Parsa
    Zarpoosh, Mahsa
    Kermani, Mohammad Ali Hojjati
    Moradi, Sajjad
    [J]. NUTRITIONAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2024,
  • [26] Tea consumption and the risk of biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies
    Xiong, Jianping
    Lin, Jianzhen
    Wang, Anqiang
    Wang, Yaqin
    Zheng, Ying
    Sang, Xinting
    Xu, Yiyao
    Lu, Xin
    Zhao, Haitao
    [J]. ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (24) : 39649 - 39657
  • [27] The Association between Circulating Carotenoids and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
    Dehnavi, Maryam Karim
    Ebrahimpour-Koujan, Soraiya
    Lot, Keyhan
    Azadbakht, Leila
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [28] Association between vitamins and risk of brain tumors: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies
    Zhang, Weichunbai
    Jiang, Jing
    He, Yongqi
    Li, Xinyi
    Yin, Shuo
    Chen, Feng
    Li, Wenbin
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2022, 9
  • [29] Association between green tea intake and risk of gastric cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies
    Huang, Yanhong
    Chen, Hongru
    Zhou, Liang
    Li, Gaoming
    Yi, Dali
    Zhang, Yanqi
    Wu, Yazhou
    Liu, Xiaoyu
    Wu, Xiaojiao
    Song, Qiuyue
    Liu, Ling
    Yi, Dong
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2017, 20 (17) : 3183 - 3192
  • [30] Processed and raw tomato consumption and risk of prostate cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
    Rowles, Joe L., III
    Ranard, Katherine M.
    Applegate, Catherine C.
    Jeon, Sookyoung
    An, Ruopeng
    Erdman, John W., Jr.
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2018, 21 (03) : 319 - 336