Thermal, electrical and structural characteristics under different concentrator positions for Fresnel concentrating photovoltaic system

被引:3
|
作者
Wu, Shuang-Ying [1 ,2 ]
Duan, Shu-Zhen [2 ]
Xiao, Lan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Key Lab Low grade Energy Utilizat Technol & Syst, Minist Educ, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Thermal and electrical characteristics; Thermal stress and deflection; Concentrating photovoltaic; Tilt angle; Concentrator position; PV/T SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; NATURAL-CONVECTION; OPTICAL ANALYSIS; SOLAR COLLECTOR; BEAM SPLITTER; DESIGN; TEMPERATURE; ENERGY; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.csite.2022.102597
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
There are always installation errors in linear Fresnel concentrating photovoltaic (CPV) system that make the system unable to work under the designed conditions. Based on the optical, thermal, electrical, and structural coupling principle, the influences of vertical position (including distance and direction) e of concentrator deviation from the focal length on the thermal (heat flux and temperature distributions), electrical (average electrical efficiency) and structural (stress and deflection) characteristics of PV panel under natural convection conditions were investigated numerically by MCRT-FVM-FEM coupling method. The results reveal that, the thermal, electrical and structural characteristics change slightly with the tilt angle alpha of PV panel from 15 degrees to 60 degrees, while these characteristics experience a relatively greater change for alpha increasing to 75 degrees. The concentrator position has little effect on the flow and temperature fields near the PV panel. Compared with the situation at alpha = 30 degrees, changing the concentrator position at alpha = 75 degrees has a more obvious effect on the thermal and structural characteristics of PV panel. When the concentrator moves from the designed position (e = 0 mm) to the deviated position (e =-45mm) at alpha = 75 degrees, the maximum thermal stress and maximum deflection of cells are dropped by 30.12% and 13.72%, respectively. Even if the concentrator moves the same distance, different directions (upward and downward) of movement can lead to differences in the thermal and structural characteristics. The change trend and magnitude of average electrical efficiency with the position of concentrator when alpha = 30 degrees are both opposite to those when alpha = 75 degrees. The average electrical efficiency at alpha = 30 degrees decreases from 7.76% at the designed position (e = 0 mm) to 7.62% at the deviated position (e = - 45mm), while the average electrical efficiency at alpha = 75 degrees increases from 9.26% to 10.54%.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Electrical performance evaluation of low-concentrating non-imaging photovoltaic concentrator
    Mallick, Tapas K.
    Eames, Philip C.
    PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS, 2008, 16 (05): : 389 - 398
  • [22] Analysis of a concentrating photovoltaic/thermal solar system
    Cheng, Xuetao
    Xu, Xianghua
    Liang, Xingang
    PROCEEDINGS OF ISES SOLAR WORLD CONGRESS 2007: SOLAR ENERGY AND HUMAN SETTLEMENT, VOLS I-V, 2007, : 1386 - 1390
  • [23] Estimation of the influence of Fresnel lens temperature on energy generation of a concentrator photovoltaic system
    Hornung, Thorsten
    Steiner, Marc
    Nitz, Peter
    SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 2012, 99 : 333 - 338
  • [24] Estimation of the Influence of Fresnel Lens Temperature on Energy Generation of a Concentrator Photovoltaic System
    Hornung, Thorsten
    Steiner, Marc
    Nitz, Peter
    7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONCENTRATING PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS (CPV-7), 2011, 1407
  • [25] The Effect of Concentrator Radius on the Performance of a Solar Photovoltaic Concentrating System with a Parabolic Dish
    Alaziz, H L. Abd
    Shneishil, Alaa H.
    Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2022, 2322 (01):
  • [26] Investigation of solar hybrid system with concentrating Fresnel lens, photovoltaic and thermoelectric generators
    Willars-Rodriguez, F. J.
    Chavez-Urbiola, E. A.
    Vorobiev, P.
    Vorobiev, Yu. V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2017, 41 (03) : 377 - 388
  • [27] Experimental validation of the thermal performance of a concentrating photovoltaic/thermal system
    Chaabane, Monia
    Mhiri, Hatem
    Bournot, Philippe
    2014 5TH INTERNATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY CONGRESS (IREC), 2014,
  • [28] Performance comparative study of a concentrating photovoltaic/thermal phase change system with different heatsinks
    Kong, Xiangfei
    Zhang, Lanlan
    Xu, Wei
    Li, Han
    Kang, Yiting
    Wu, Jianlin
    Fan, Man
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 208
  • [29] Integrated optical-thermal-electrical modeling of compound parabolic concentrator based photovoltaic-thermal system
    Parthiban, Anandhi
    Mallick, T. K.
    Reddy, K. S.
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 251
  • [30] Simulation studies of thermal and electrical performance of solar linear parabolic trough concentrating photovoltaic system
    Srivastava, Shreekant
    Reddy, K. S.
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2017, 149 : 195 - 213