A new decision analysis framework for multi-attribute decision-making under interval uncertainty

被引:0
|
作者
Pan, Xiao-Hong [1 ]
He, Shi-Fan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Ying-Ming [2 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Sch Business, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Fuzhou Univ, Decis Sci Inst, Fuzhou 350108, Fujian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Decision analysis; Cumulative prospect theory; Interval-valued fuzzy sets; Enhanced minimax regret-based approach; CUMULATIVE PROSPECT-THEORY; EVIDENTIAL REASONING APPROACH; PARAMETER-FREE ELICITATION; FUZZY-SETS; SIMILARITY; DISTANCE; SUSTAINABILITY; SELECTION; AVERSION; DEMATEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.fss.2024.108867
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
In decision -making analysis, the description on decision makers' risk attitude under uncertainty is a focus topic. This paper presents a novel decision analysis framework that considers uncertainty and risk using the cumulative prospect theory. The proposed approach describes uncertain preference information using interval -valued fuzzy sets, maintaining this representation without converting intervals into crisp numbers throughout the entire process. To quantify the distance between interval -valued fuzzy sets, we introduce a comprehensive interval -valued distance model that accounts for multiple situations determined based on the relative positions between intervals. Afterwards, some related theorems about the proposed interval -valued distance model are explored mathematically. Then, with the aid of different reference points and interval -valued distance model, the overall interval -valued prospect value of each alternative is investigated. Finally, an Enhanced Minimax Regret -based (EMR) approach is developed to compare and rank the obtained overall interval -valued prospect values. An illustrative example, accompanied by detailed discussions, is provided to demonstrate the flexibility and superiority of the proposed decision analysis framework.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multi-attribute decision-making method with subjective preference
    Wang, JQ
    Liu, XJ
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2001 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, VOLS I AND II, 2001, : 582 - 585
  • [32] MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING USING CONSTRAINED CRITERIA
    SCHENKERMAN, S
    [J]. COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1977, 4 (02) : 139 - 145
  • [33] Interval multi-attribute decision making with preference information on attributes
    Liu, Manfeng
    Tang, Houxing
    [J]. Journal of Computational Information Systems, 2010, 6 (02): : 429 - 438
  • [34] Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Ship Structural Design
    Pereira, Tiago
    Garbatov, Yordan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (08)
  • [35] Multi-attribute Decision-making in Economics of Fire Protection
    Vaidogas, Egidijus Rytas
    Sakenaite, Jurgita
    [J]. INZINERINE EKONOMIKA-ENGINEERING ECONOMICS, 2011, 22 (03): : 262 - 270
  • [36] Multi-attribute decision-making based on the SPIFGIA operators
    Wang C.
    Fu X.
    Meng S.
    He Y.
    [J]. Granular Computing, 2017, 2 (4) : 321 - 331
  • [37] Cognitively Inspired Multi-attribute Decision-making Methods Under Uncertainty: a State-of-the-art Survey
    Hangyao Wu
    Zeshui Xu
    [J]. Cognitive Computation, 2022, 14 : 511 - 530
  • [38] Situational variables and sustainability in multi-attribute decision-making
    Simpson, Bonnie J. K.
    Radford, Scott K.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2014, 48 (5-6) : 1046 - 1069
  • [39] Cognitively Inspired Multi-attribute Decision-making Methods Under Uncertainty: a State-of-the-art Survey
    Wu, Hangyao
    Xu, Zeshui
    [J]. COGNITIVE COMPUTATION, 2022, 14 (02) : 511 - 530
  • [40] Fuzzy Multi-attribute Decision-making Based on Grey Relation Analysis
    Zhang, Xin-bo
    Lu, Ying
    [J]. 2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION AND MODELING WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 738 - 741