The Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between General and Topical Anesthesia on Micro-Plasma Radiofrequency Treatment for Hypertrophic Scar: A Retrospective Cohort Study

被引:0
|
作者
Meng, Fanting [1 ]
Wu, Qian [1 ]
Zheng, Can [1 ]
Fu, Qiang [1 ]
Zhou, Guiwen [1 ]
Ding, Hongfan [1 ]
Xu, Xiao [2 ]
Chen, Minliang [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Med Ctr 4, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Sr Dept Burns & Plast Surg, 51 Fucheng Rd, Beijing 10048, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Med Ctr 3, Dept Ophthalmol, 69 Yongding Rd, Beijing 100039, Peoples R China
关键词
Micro-plasma radiofrequency; Hypertrophic scar; Surface anesthesia; General anesthesia; ACNE SCARS; LASER; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1007/s00266-023-03706-3
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundWhile micro-plasma radiofrequency (MPR) treatment has a significant impact on hypertrophic scars, patients often require anesthesia to alleviate substantial discomfort. Currently, patients with similar degrees of scarring may choose surface anesthesia or general anesthesia based on their personal preferences. Nevertheless, the effectiveness and safety of different anesthesia modalities remain uncertain.ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness and safety of both general and surface anesthesia in MPR treatment for hypertrophic scars.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 101 patients diagnosed with hypertrophic scars who underwent MPR with different anesthesia methods. The primary measures of efficacy included the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) scores assessed before the first treatment and six months after the final treatment. Pain relief was evaluated using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores. Safety was assessed by comparing the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups.ResultsPatients in the general anesthesia group showed a significant difference in scar pigmentation 6 months after the treatment and lower pain level than those in the surface anesthesia group in the treatment of MPR. The difference in safety was not statistically significant. After adjusting for confounding factors and propensity score matching, the outcome of VSS and VAS scores was stable.ConclusionGeneral anesthesia, as opposed to surface anesthesia, appears to enhance both the effectiveness and safety of MPR while reducing postoperative pain in the treatment of hypertrophic scars. For patients with heightened pain sensitivity, general anesthesia may be the preferred treatment option.Level of Evidence IIThis journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://www.springer.com/00266.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 460
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy and safety of continuous radiofrequency thermocoagulation plus pulsed radiofrequency for treatment of V1 trigeminal neuralgia A prospective cohort study
    Yao, Peng
    Hong, Tao
    Zhu, Yong-qiang
    Li, Hong-xi
    Wang, Zhi-bin
    Ding, Yuan-yuan
    Ma, Jia-ming
    Pan, Shi-nong
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (44)
  • [32] The efficacy and safety of combined pulsed and conventional radiofrequency treatment of refractory cases of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: a retrospective study
    Ali A. Ali Eissa
    Raafat M. Reyad
    Emad G. Saleh
    Amr El-Saman
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2015, 29 : 728 - 733
  • [33] The efficacy and safety of combined pulsed and conventional radiofrequency treatment of refractory cases of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: a retrospective study
    Eissa, Ali A. Ali
    Reyad, Raafat M.
    Saleh, Emad G.
    El-Saman, Amr
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2015, 29 (05) : 728 - 733
  • [34] Association between general anesthesia for cesarean delivery and subsequent developmental disorders in children: a nationwide retrospective cohort study
    Yi-Chen Chen
    Fu-Wen Liang
    Ping-Heng Tan
    Chung-Han Ho
    Ying-Jen Chang
    Kuo-Chuan Hung
    Jen-Yin Chen
    Chia-Hung Yu
    BMC Medicine, 23 (1)
  • [35] Success rate of the treatment of early childhood caries under general anesthesia: A retrospective cohort study in different periods
    Zhang, Baize
    Wang, Junhui
    Han, Xinxin
    Fang, Ruohao
    Wang, Zirui
    Hui, Zeming
    Chen, Yujiang
    Liu, Jiajia
    Wang, Xiaojing
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2023, 11
  • [36] Feasibility and safety of percutaneous cryoablation under local anesthesia for the treatment of malignant lung tumors: a retrospective cohort study
    Kaseda, Kaoru
    Asakura, Keisuke
    Nishida, Risa
    Okubo, Yu
    Masai, Kyohei
    Hishida, Tomoyuki
    Inoue, Masanori
    Yashiro, Hideki
    Nakatsuka, Seishi
    Jinzaki, Masahiro
    Asamura, Hisao
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2022, 14 (11) : 4297 - +
  • [37] Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy for Cancer: A Comparison Between General Anesthesia and Epidural Anesthesia with Fentanyl Analgesia: A Matched Cohort Study
    Sprung, Juraj
    Scavonetto, Federica
    Yeoh, Tze Yeng
    Kramer, Jessica M.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Eisenach, John H.
    Schroeder, Darrell R.
    Weingarten, Toby N.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2014, 119 (04): : 859 - 866
  • [38] Establishing the safety of phenobarbital treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome on general medical wards: A retrospective cohort study
    Ronan, Matthew, V
    Ganatra, Rahul B.
    Saukkonen, Jussi
    ALCOHOL, 2024, 116 : 29 - 34
  • [39] The efficacy and safety of bucillamine as a second-line DMARD in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study
    Suda, Akiko
    Nagaoka, Shouhei
    Ohono, Shigeru
    Ideguchi, Haruko
    Soga, Takayoshi
    Ishigatsubo, Yoshiaki
    MODERN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2008, 18 (06) : 609 - 614
  • [40] Determining the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of JAK Inhibitors in the Treatment of Dermatomyositis: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Rangaswamy, Shivani
    Christopher-Stine, Lisa
    Albayda, Jemima
    Tiniakou, Eleni
    Mecoli, Christopher
    Adler, Brittany
    Eline, Ellen
    Kelly, William
    Paik, Julie
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 74 : 3731 - 3733