Relationship between soft tissue dimensions and tomographic radial root position classification system for immediate implant installation

被引:0
|
作者
Rodrigues, Diogo Moreira [1 ]
Gluckman, Howard [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Pontes, Carla Cruvinel [5 ]
Januario, Alessandro Lourenco [6 ]
Petersen, Rodrigo Lima [7 ]
de Moraes, Jose Rodrigo [8 ]
Barboza, Eliane Porto [9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Dent Sci INCO 25, Dept Periodontol, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[2] Implant & Aesthet Acad, Cape Town, South Africa
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Dent Med, Dept Periodont, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Univ Western Cape, Dept Oral Med & Periodontol, Sch Dent, Cape Town, South Africa
[5] Groote Schuur Hosp, Surg, Cape Town, South Africa
[6] Aria Dent Inst, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[7] Petersen Image Diagnost Ctr, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[8] Fed Fluminense Univ, Dept Stat, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[9] Fluminense Fed Univ, Dept Dent Clin, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[10] Lake Erie Coll Osteopath Med LECOM Sch Dent Med, Sch Dent Med, Lakewood Ranch, FL USA
关键词
Phenotype; Gingiva; Cone beam computed tomography; 3-D imaging; Dental implants; Immediate implants; OUTCOMES FOLLOWING IMMEDIATE; BEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; AESTHETIC OUTCOMES; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10266-023-00897-8
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between soft tissue dimensions and radial root position (RRP) classification for immediate implant placement on maxillary anterior teeth. Maxillary anterior teeth (n = 420) were analyzed in the radial plane of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Each tooth was classified according to its RRP: class I, (IA, IB); class II (IIA, IIB) class III; class IV, and class V. Soft tissue thickness at different landmarks, supracrestal soft tissue height, and crestal bone thickness were measured in CBCT. Keratinized tissue width was clinically measured. Gingival phenotype (thick or thin) was evaluated by transparency of the periodontal probe and at the landmark 2 mm from the gingival margin in CBCT. Class I tooth position accounted for 31.7%, class II for 45%, class III for 13.3%, class IV for 0.5%, and class V for 9.5%. The gingival phenotype was associated with RRP (chi(2) test, p < 0.05). Soft tissue dimensions were significantly different over RRP classes (ANOVA and Tukey tests, p < 0.05). Types IA and IIA presented both thick soft and hard tissues. When planning immediate implants in the anterior maxilla, soft tissue dimensions evaluation should be incorporated into RRP classification to increase the accuracy and predictability of treatment outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:988 / 1000
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [11] Relationship between anterior maxillary tooth sagittal root position and periodontal phenotype: a clinical and tomographic study
    Diogo M. Rodrigues
    Rodrigo L. Petersen
    Caroline Montez
    José R. de Moraes
    Alessandro L. Januário
    Eliane P. Barboza
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022, 26 : 1309 - 1321
  • [12] Influence of Implant Position on Clinical Crown Length and Peri-implant Soft Tissue Dimensions at Implant-Supported Single Crowns Replacing Maxillary Central Incisors
    Peng, Min
    Fei, Wei
    Hosseini, Mandana
    Gotfredsen, Klaus
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2013, 33 (06) : 785 - +
  • [13] Differences in Soft Tissue Wound Healing between Immediate and Delayed Implant Placement: An Experimental Preclinical In Vivo Investigation
    Pla, Rafael
    Sanz-Esporrin, Javier
    Palombo, David
    Vignoletti, Fabio
    Luengo, Fernando
    Sanz, Mariano
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (18):
  • [14] Classification of Sagittal Root Position in Relation to the Anterior Maxillary Osseous Housing for Immediate Implant Placement: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study
    Kan, Joseph Y. K.
    Roe, Phillip
    Rungcharassaeng, Kitichai
    Patel, Rishi D.
    Waki, Tomonori
    Lozada, Jaime L.
    Zimmerman, Grenith
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2011, 26 (04) : 873 - 876
  • [15] Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between jaw divergence and facial soft tissue dimensions
    Rongo, Roberto
    Antoun, Joseph Saswat
    Lim, Yi Xin
    Dias, George
    Valletta, Rosa
    Farella, Mauro
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2014, 84 (05) : 788 - 794
  • [16] Relationship Between Facial Bone Dimensions, Orofacial Implant Position, and Esthetic Outcomes of Single-Tooth Implants
    Shahdad, Shakeel
    Makdissi, Jamil
    Gamboa, Ana
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2023, 36 (06) : 668 - +
  • [17] Analysis of the sagittal root angle and its correlation with hard and soft tissue indices in anterior teeth for immediate implant evaluation: a retrospective study
    Mengru Shi
    Xiaoshuang Wang
    Peisheng Zeng
    Haiwen Liu
    Zhuohong Gong
    Yixiong Lin
    Zhipeng Li
    Zetao Chen
    Zhuofan Chen
    BMC Oral Health, 21
  • [18] Analysis of the sagittal root angle and its correlation with hard and soft tissue indices in anterior teeth for immediate implant evaluation: a retrospective study
    Shi, Mengru
    Wang, Xiaoshuang
    Zeng, Peisheng
    Liu, Haiwen
    Gong, Zhuohong
    Lin, Yixiong
    Li, Zhipeng
    Chen, Zetao
    Chen, Zhuofan
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [19] Effect of Bone Grafting on Hard and Soft Tissue Changes Following Immediate Implant Installation in Mandibular Molar Sites: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
    Nasrabadi N.
    Forouzanfar A.
    Farsi M.R.
    Babaei K.
    Ahrari F.
    Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, 2023, 33 (03) : 87 - 96
  • [20] Relationship between supracrestal soft tissue dimensions and other periodontal phenotypic features: A cross-sectional study
    Couso-Queiruga, Emilio
    Barboza, Eliane Porto
    Avila-Ortiz, Gustavo
    Gonzalez-Martin, Oscar
    Chambrone, Leandro
    Rodrigues, Diogo Moreira
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2023, 94 (08) : 944 - 955