Relationship between soft tissue dimensions and tomographic radial root position classification system for immediate implant installation

被引:0
|
作者
Rodrigues, Diogo Moreira [1 ]
Gluckman, Howard [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Pontes, Carla Cruvinel [5 ]
Januario, Alessandro Lourenco [6 ]
Petersen, Rodrigo Lima [7 ]
de Moraes, Jose Rodrigo [8 ]
Barboza, Eliane Porto [9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Dent Sci INCO 25, Dept Periodontol, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[2] Implant & Aesthet Acad, Cape Town, South Africa
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Dent Med, Dept Periodont, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Univ Western Cape, Dept Oral Med & Periodontol, Sch Dent, Cape Town, South Africa
[5] Groote Schuur Hosp, Surg, Cape Town, South Africa
[6] Aria Dent Inst, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[7] Petersen Image Diagnost Ctr, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[8] Fed Fluminense Univ, Dept Stat, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[9] Fluminense Fed Univ, Dept Dent Clin, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[10] Lake Erie Coll Osteopath Med LECOM Sch Dent Med, Sch Dent Med, Lakewood Ranch, FL USA
关键词
Phenotype; Gingiva; Cone beam computed tomography; 3-D imaging; Dental implants; Immediate implants; OUTCOMES FOLLOWING IMMEDIATE; BEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; AESTHETIC OUTCOMES; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10266-023-00897-8
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between soft tissue dimensions and radial root position (RRP) classification for immediate implant placement on maxillary anterior teeth. Maxillary anterior teeth (n = 420) were analyzed in the radial plane of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Each tooth was classified according to its RRP: class I, (IA, IB); class II (IIA, IIB) class III; class IV, and class V. Soft tissue thickness at different landmarks, supracrestal soft tissue height, and crestal bone thickness were measured in CBCT. Keratinized tissue width was clinically measured. Gingival phenotype (thick or thin) was evaluated by transparency of the periodontal probe and at the landmark 2 mm from the gingival margin in CBCT. Class I tooth position accounted for 31.7%, class II for 45%, class III for 13.3%, class IV for 0.5%, and class V for 9.5%. The gingival phenotype was associated with RRP (chi(2) test, p < 0.05). Soft tissue dimensions were significantly different over RRP classes (ANOVA and Tukey tests, p < 0.05). Types IA and IIA presented both thick soft and hard tissues. When planning immediate implants in the anterior maxilla, soft tissue dimensions evaluation should be incorporated into RRP classification to increase the accuracy and predictability of treatment outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:988 / 1000
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Radial plane tooth position and bone wall dimensions in the anterior maxilla: A CBCT classification for immediate implant placement
    Gluckman, Howard
    Pontes, Carla Cruvinel
    Du Toit, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2018, 120 (01): : 50 - 56
  • [2] Determination of Implant Position for Immediate Implant Placement in Maxillary Central Incisors Using Palatal Soft Tissue Landmarks
    Chung, Shin-Hye
    Park, Young-Seok
    Chung, Seung-Hwan
    Shon, Won-Jun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2014, 29 (03) : 627 - 633
  • [3] Classification of the Root Position of the Maxillary Central Incisors and its Clinical Significance in Immediate Implant Placement
    Xu, Duoling
    Wang, Zhao
    Sun, Lei
    Lin, Zhenyan
    Wan, Linzi
    Li, Yang
    Lin, Xuan
    Peng, Wei
    Zhang, Zuyan
    Gao, Yongbo
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2016, 25 (04) : 520 - 524
  • [4] The relationship between tomographic sagittal root position of maxillary anterior teeth and the bone housing
    Rodrigues, Diogo M.
    Petersen, Rodrigo L.
    Montez, Caroline
    de Moraes, Jose R.
    Ferreira, Vinicius
    Barboza, Eliane Porto
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2023, 130 (05): : 705 - 714
  • [5] A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study of Changes in Soft Tissue Position Following Immediate and Delayed Implant Placement
    van Kesteren, Christopher J.
    Schoolfield, John
    West, Jason
    Oates, Thomas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2010, 25 (03) : 562 - 570
  • [6] Classification of premolars sagittal root position and angulation for immediate implant placement: a cone beam computed tomography study
    Zhan, Yalin
    Wang, Miaozhen
    Cheng, Xueyuan
    Liu, Feng
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 135 (02): : 175 - 184
  • [7] The relationship between labial soft tissue changes and jumping spaces after immediate implant placement and restoration in the anterior maxilla: A prospective study
    Xu, Linkun
    Zhang, Sui
    Chen, Yue
    Yu, Feiyan
    Han, Chong
    Wu, Dongchao
    He, Dongning
    BIOMOLECULES AND BIOMEDICINE, 2023, 23 (05): : 848 - 865
  • [8] EAO POSITION PAPER Immediate Implant Placement: Managing Hard and Soft Tissue Stability from Diagnosis to Prosthetic Treatment
    Cosyn, Jan
    Blanco, Juan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2023, 36 (05) : 533 - 545
  • [9] Longitudinal Soft Tissue Changes During Periodontal Ligament Mediated Immediate Implant Placement with the Root-Membrane Technique
    Mitsias, Miltiadis M.
    Bratos, Manuel
    Siormpas, Konstantinos
    Pikos, Michael A.
    Kotsakis, Georgios A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2020, 35 (02) : 379 - 385
  • [10] Relationship between anterior maxillary tooth sagittal root position and periodontal phenotype: a clinical and tomographic study
    Rodrigues, Diogo M.
    Petersen, Rodrigo L.
    Montez, Caroline
    de Moraes, Jose R.
    Januario, Alessandro L.
    Barboza, Eliane P.
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (02) : 1309 - 1321