Presenting an Effective Motivational Model on the Knowledge Acquisition Process Using Fuzzy Best-Worst Method (FBWM)

被引:1
|
作者
Jafari, Mostafa [1 ]
Zahedi, Mohammadreza [2 ]
Khanachah, Shayan Naghdi [1 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Ind Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Malek Ashtar Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Knowledge acquisition; knowledge management; motivation; fuzzy; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1142/S0219649223500612
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
In the knowledge economy, knowledge-based organisations, in particular, open a special account for their employees. Knowledge acquisition is important for organisations, because it enables them to improve their skills and creates value, credibility and competitive advantage. This research has been made to identify the motivational factors effective for knowledge acquisition and prioritise these factors, as well as providing a framework for managers to enable knowledge sharing from knowledge workers and increase their desire to overcome current problems. The organisation has been paid. The statistical population of the research is 300 managers and experts in the automotive industry, and in this research, the opinions of 20 experts have been used to analyse the results. The results were analysed using the fuzzy technique to answer the research questions. The calculations obtained by applying the proposed method show that among the six factors affecting knowledge acquisition, Behavioural factors, with a weight of 0.296, have the most impact on knowledge acquisition compared to other factors. After that, the factor of Information Technology in the organisation, with a weight of 0.17, is in second place concerning the level of influence on knowledge acquisition. Also, the Organisational Learning Criteria are ranked third with a weight of 0.165. And the factors of Organisational Culture, Reward and Structure are placed in the next priorities with weights of 0.153, 0.094 and 0.121, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using Analytic Hierarchy Process and Best-Worst Method in Group Evaluation of Urban Park Quality
    Srdjevic, Bojan
    Srdjevic, Zorica
    Reynolds, Keith M.
    Lakicevic, Milena
    Zdero, Senka
    FORESTS, 2022, 13 (02):
  • [22] A novel hybrid decision-making framework based on modified fuzzy analytic network process and fuzzy best-worst method
    Khanmohammadi, Ehsan
    Azizi, Maryam
    Talaie, HamidReza
    Ecer, Fatih
    Tirkolaee, Erfan Babaee
    OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (04)
  • [23] Identifying challenges and barriers for development of solar energy by using fuzzy best-worst method: A case study
    Mostafaeipour, Ali
    Alvandimanesh, Marzieh
    Naja, Fatemeh
    Issakhov, Alibek
    ENERGY, 2021, 226
  • [24] Green Supplier Selection Using Improved TOPSIS and Best-Worst Method Under Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment
    Tian, Zhang-Peng
    Zhang, Hong-Yu
    Wang, Jian-Qiang
    Wang, Tie-Li
    INFORMATICA, 2018, 29 (04) : 773 - 800
  • [25] Selecting lighting system based on workers' cognitive performance using fuzzy best-worst method and QUALIFLEX
    Zare, Asma
    Malakoutikhah, Mahdi
    Alimohammadlou, Moslem
    COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK, 2020, 22 (03) : 641 - 652
  • [26] Bayesian best-worst method: A probabilistic group decision making model
    Mohammadi, Majid
    Rezaei, Jafar
    Omega (United Kingdom), 2020, 96
  • [27] MODAL SPLIT ANALYSIS BY BEST-WORST METHOD AND MULTINOMINAL LOGIT MODEL
    Cingel, Michal
    Drliciak, Marek
    Celko, Jan
    Zabovska, Katarina
    TRANSPORT PROBLEMS, 2023, 18 (01) : 55 - 65
  • [28] Bayesian best-worst method: A probabilistic group decision making model
    Mohammadi, Majid
    Rezaei, Jafar
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2020, 96
  • [29] Ranking of choice cues for smartphones using the Best-Worst scaling method
    Pinto, Luis
    Kaynak, Erdener
    Chow, Clement S. F.
    Zhang, Lida L.
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MARKETING AND LOGISTICS, 2019, 31 (01) : 223 - 245
  • [30] Hierarchical Decision-making using a New Mathematical Model based on the Best-worst Method
    Tabatabaei, M. H.
    Amiri, M.
    Ghahremanloo, M.
    Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M.
    Zavadskas, E. K.
    Antucheviciene, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL, 2019, 14 (06) : 710 - 725