River dike grasslands can reconcile biodiversity and different ecosystem services to provide multifunctionality

被引:4
|
作者
Teixeira, Leonardo H. [1 ]
Bauer, Markus [1 ]
Moosner, Michaela [1 ]
Kollmann, Johannes [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Sch Life Sci, Chair Restorat Ecol, Emil Ramann Str 6, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
关键词
biodiversity conservation; ecological restoration; grassland management; habitat connectivity; multifunctional ecosystems; river embankment; PLANT DIVERSITY; SOIL-EROSION; RESTORATION; MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION; PRODUCTIVITY; IMMEDIATE; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.baae.2022.12.001
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
River dikes are secondary habitats that support species-rich grasslands when maintained by low-intensity mowing or grazing. Besides erosion control and habitat creation, dike grasslands have provided several other ecosystem services (ESs), such as biomass production and recreation. Despite the existence of trade-offs between ESs, the overarching aim of restoration and management on river dikes is to increase its multifunctionality. We believe that multiple land uses can be reconciled with biodiversity conservation. Here, we propose a conceptual framework for assessing grassland multifunctionality, and test its application using river dikes as a model system. We also present some practical implications based on vegetation surveys and manipulative experiments along the Rivers Danube and Inn in S Germany. We identified four main ESs of dike grasslands ranked by importance: erosion control, conservation of habitats, recreation and biomass production. These ESs are closely linked to general biodiversity aspects, such as species richness. Therefore, ESs can be controlled by site preparation, trait-based seeding design and grassland management. As the multifunctionality of dikes becomes more important under climate change, the spatio-temporal variability of the dike vegetation must also be considered. In conclusion, dike grasslands are an interesting model for restoration and nature conservation, since they have high potential to deliver multiple ESs while increasing biodiversity. However, restoration and management of dike grassland would benefit from more cooperation between conservation and river authorities, and by implementing ecological knowledge and using experiments to test new management or restoration approaches.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier GmbH on behalf of Gesellschaft fur Okologie. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 30
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ecosystem services under different grazing intensities in typical grasslands in Inner Mongolia and their relationships
    Li, Mengyuan
    Li, Xiaobing
    Liu, Siyu
    Li, Xiang
    Lyu, Xin
    Dang, Dongliang
    Dou, Huashun
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2021, 26
  • [32] Agriculturally Improved and Semi-Natural Permanent Grasslands Provide Complementary Ecosystem Services in Swedish Boreal Landscapes
    Nunez, Guillermo Aguilera
    Glimskar, Anders
    Zacchello, Giulia
    Francksen, Richard M.
    Whittingham, Mark J.
    Hiron, Matthew
    [J]. AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [33] Evaluation of ecosystem services in a protected mountain area: Soil organic carbon stock and biodiversity in alpine forests and grasslands
    Canedoli, Claudia
    Ferre, Chiara
    Abu El Khair, Davide
    Comolli, Roberto
    Liga, Claudio
    Mazzucchelli, Francesca
    Proietto, Angela
    Rota, Noemi
    Colombo, Giacomo
    Bassano, Bruno
    Viterbi, Ramona
    Padoa-Schioppa, Emilio
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 44
  • [34] The social value of biodiversity and ecosystem services from the perspectives of different social actors
    Caceres, Daniel M.
    Tapella, Esteban
    Quetier, Fabien
    Diaz, Sandra
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (01):
  • [35] Food production, ecosystem services and biodiversity: We can't have it all everywhere
    Holt, Alison R.
    Alix, Anne
    Thompson, Anne
    Maltby, Lorraine
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 573 : 1422 - 1429
  • [36] How can global conventions for biodiversity and ecosystem services guide local conservation actions?
    Geijzendorffer, Ilse R.
    van Teeffelen, Astrid J. A.
    Allison, Hilary
    Braun, Daniela
    Horgan, Katherine
    Iturrate-Garcia, Maitane
    Santos, Maria Joao
    Pellissier, Loic
    Prieur-Richard, Anne-Helene
    Quatrini, Simone
    Sakai, Shoko
    Zuppinger-Dingley, Debra
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 29 : 145 - 150
  • [37] The Biodiversity of Urban and Peri-Urban Forests and the Diverse Ecosystem Services They Provide as Socio-Ecological Systems
    Livesley, Stephen J.
    Escobedo, Francisco J.
    Morgenroth, Justin
    [J]. FORESTS, 2016, 7 (12)
  • [38] Global change, biodiversity, and ecosystem services: What can we learn from studies of pollination?
    Winfree, Rachael
    [J]. BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2013, 14 (06) : 453 - 460
  • [39] Functional diversity and secondary production of macrofaunal assemblages can provide insights of biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships
    Wang, Zhe
    Xu, Jing
    Xu, Zhaodong
    Liu, Xiaoshou
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE, 2024, 36 (01)
  • [40] Functional diversity and secondary production of macrofaunal assemblages can provide insights of biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships
    Zhe Wang
    Jing Xu
    Zhaodong Xu
    Xiaoshou Liu
    [J]. Environmental Sciences Europe, 36