Validating the NIH LDL-C equation for provincial implementation in Alberta

被引:0
|
作者
Higgins, V. [1 ,2 ]
Garcia, L. [2 ]
Gifford, J. L. [3 ,4 ]
Volodko, N. [1 ,2 ]
Beriault, D. R. [5 ,6 ]
Parker, M. L. [1 ,2 ]
Estey, M. P. [1 ,2 ]
Proctor, D. T. [1 ,2 ]
Ismail, O. Z. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] DynaLIFE Med Labs, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] DynaLIFE Med Labs, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Lab Med & Pathobiol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] St Michaels Hosp, Dept Lab Med & Pathobiol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
LDL-C; Triglycerides; Lipid panel; Cardiovascular disease; DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2023.110678
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: LDL-C, a cardiovascular disease risk assessment biomarker, is commonly calculated using the Friedewald equation. The NIH equation overcomes several limitations of the Friedewald equation. Consistent with the Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists (CSCC) lipid reporting recommendations, we assessed the NIH LDL-C equation in Alberta prior to its provincial implementation.Methods: 1-year (01/01/2021-12/31/2021) of lipid results (n = 1,486,584 after data cleaning) were obtained from five analytical instrument groups used across Alberta. Analyses were performed on all data and after separating by age, analytical instrument group, and fasting status. The correlation between Friedewald- and NIHcalculated LDL-C and between Friedewald- and NIH-calculated LDL-C difference and each lipid parameter, was determined. The frequency of unreportable/inaccurate LDL-C results was compared between the two equations. The concordance between the two equations and with non-HDL-C was determined at LDL-C thresholds. Lastly, LDL-C calculated by Friedewald, NIH, and Martin-Hopkins equations was compared to density-gradient ultracentrifugation. Results: Friedewald- and NIH-calculated LDL-C exhibit the strongest correlation when triglycerides <= 4.52 mmol/ L. The difference between Friedewald- and NIH-calculated LDL-C increases with decreasing LDL-C concentration. The NIH equation yields fewer inaccurate results (0.35 % vs. 22.0 %). The percent agreement between equations was > 96 % at all LDL-C thresholds, suggesting most patients will not require treatment changes. NIH-calculated LDL-C exhibited better agreement with non-HDL-C when triglycerides <= 9.04 mmol/L and better correlated with LDL-C measured by ultracentrifugation (r(2) = 0.926 vs. 0.775 (Friedewald) and 0.863 (Martin-Hopkins)). Results were consistent across age, analytical instrument group, and fasting status.Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate the benefits of implementing the NIH equation across Alberta.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Characteristics of type 2 daibete with LDL-C controlled or not reaching the goals for LDL-C and non-apolipoprotein B
    Querton, L.
    Buysschaert, M.
    Hermans, M. P.
    DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2011, 37 : A78 - A78
  • [32] Effectiveness of rosuvastatin in reducing LDL-C and target LDL-C goal attainment in real-world clinical practice
    Gandhi, Sanjay K.
    Jarbrink, Krister
    Fox, Kathleen M.
    Brandrup-Wognsen, Gunnar
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2009, 25 (12) : 2817 - 2828
  • [33] Serum LDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio are Positively Correlated to Lymph Node Stages in Males with Colorectal Cancer
    Liu, Ye-Liu
    Qian, Hai-Xin
    Qin, Lei
    Zhou, Xiao-Jun
    Zhang, Bo
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 58 (106) : 383 - 387
  • [34] Achievement of LDL-C goals depends on baseline LDL-C and choice and dose of statin: An analysis from the VOYAGER database
    Palmer, Mike K.
    Nicholls, Stephen J.
    Lundman, Pia
    Barter, Philip J.
    Karlson, Bjoern W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 20 (06) : 1080 - 1087
  • [35] Using Non-HDL-C/Triglyceride Ratio To Screen For Direct LDL-C Testing: Improving LDL-C Estimates At A Cost
    Vasquez, Nestor
    Quispe, Renato
    Jones, Steven R.
    Martin, Seth S.
    Joshi, Parag H.
    Muthukumar, Alagarraju
    CIRCULATION, 2020, 141
  • [36] Ldl-c to non-hdl-c ratio method: a simple way to determine bias for ldl-c methods on hypertriglyceridemic samples
    Gcingca, T. A.
    Sampson, M.
    Meeusen, J. W.
    Donato, L. J.
    Jaffe, A. S.
    Remaley, A. T.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2024, 70
  • [37] Evaluation of different formulas for LDL-C calculation
    Vujovic, Ana
    Kotur-Stevuljevic, Jelena
    Spasic, Slavica
    Bujisic, Nada
    Martinovic, Jelena
    Vujovic, Milica
    Spasojevic-Kalimanovska, Vesna
    Zeljkovic, Aleksandra
    Pajic, Dragoljub
    LIPIDS IN HEALTH AND DISEASE, 2010, 9
  • [38] 血清LDL-C测定方法分析
    李钰
    中国热带医学, 2006, (12) : 2223 - 2224
  • [39] Threshold for effect of triglycerides and LDL-c on lipoprotein(a)
    Foody, JAM
    Pearce, GL
    Sprecher, DL
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 35 (02) : 300A - 300A
  • [40] Low LDL-C: Is It all Good News?
    Hartz, Jacob
    CURRENT ATHEROSCLEROSIS REPORTS, 2024, 26 (12) : 673 - 681