Investment decision making in the fuzzy context: An integrated model approach

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Shasha [1 ]
Liu, Xiaodi [1 ]
Garg, Harish [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Shitao [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ Technol, Sch Math & Phys, Maanshan 243002, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Thapar Inst Engn & Technol Deemed Univ, Sch Math, Patiala, Punjab, India
[3] Graph Era Deemed Univ, Dept Math, Dehra Dun, Uttarakhand, India
[4] Appl Sci Private Univ, Appl Sci Res Ctr, Amman, Jordan
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Investment decision making; Distance; Correlation coefficient; Disappointment theory; Probabilistic hesitant fuzzy sets; REGRET THEORY; PROSPECT-THEORY; DISAPPOINTMENT; CHOICE;
D O I
10.3233/JIFS-223059
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
With the implementation and steady progress of the Belt and Road (B&R) initiative, China's investment in countries along the B&R has maintained a high growth trend. Generally speaking, investment problems are often accompanied by high risk and uncertainty, and howto make the suitable investment decision is a difficult issue. This paper investigates an investment decision approach under the probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment. Firstly, a new probabilistic hesitant fuzzy distance and correlation coefficient are defined to overcome the defects of the existing probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information measures. Secondly, an attribute weight integrated model is constructed by combining the maximum deviation method, the CRITIC method and the maximum entropy principle, which is able to take into account the correlation between attributes and make full use of the decision information. In addition, a disappointment theory-based probabilistic hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making (PHFMADM) method is proposed to solve the investment decision problem, which can integrate the psychological behavior of decision makers into the decision making process and make the decision results more authentic and reliable. Finally, the rationality and validity of the method are verified by comparing with the existing methods.
引用
收藏
页码:3763 / 3786
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Decision framework with integrated methods for group decision-making under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy context and unknown weights
    Garg, Harish
    Krishankumar, R.
    Ravichandran, K. S.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 200
  • [32] Modeling Personalized Fuzzy Candlestick Patterns for Investment Decision Making
    Lee, Chiung-Hon Leon
    2009 ASIA-PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION PROCESSING (APCIP 2009), VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 286 - 289
  • [33] Composite fuzzy measure and its application to investment decision making
    Kaino, T
    Hirota, K
    INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGIES - THEORY AND APPLICATIONS: NEW TRENDS IN INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGIES, 2002, 76 : 329 - 335
  • [34] Application of model of fuzzy mathematics on the risk during the investment and decision-making of construction item
    Liu, Bing-Nan
    Song, Jin-Zhao
    Yang, Jian-Ping
    Xi'an Jianzhu Keji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, 2003, 35 (04):
  • [35] AutoML Approach for Decision Making in a Manufacturing Context
    Mallouk, Issam
    Sallez, Yves
    Abou El Majd, Badr
    SERVICE ORIENTED, HOLONIC AND MULTI-AGENT MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS FOR INDUSTRY OF THE FUTURE, SOHOMA 2023, 2024, 1136 : 151 - 163
  • [36] An integrated multiple criteria decision making model applying axiomatic fuzzy set theory
    Tao, Lili
    Chen, Yan
    Liu, Xiaodong
    Wang, Xin
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2012, 36 (10) : 5046 - 5058
  • [37] A fuzzy logic based approach for decision making
    Yadav, Harikesh Bahadur
    Kumar, Sumit
    Kumar, Yugal
    Yadav, Dilip Kumar
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2018, 35 (02) : 1531 - 1539
  • [38] A FUZZY APPROACH TO THE MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING
    Sevcik, Vitezslav
    MENDEL 2008, 2008, : 198 - 202
  • [39] An integrated fuzzy multi criteria group decision making model for handling equipment selection
    Yazdani-Chamzini, Abdolreza
    JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 20 (05) : 660 - 673