Tinnitus Screener: Short-Term Test-Retest Reliability

被引:4
|
作者
Thielman, Emily J. [1 ]
Reavis, Kelly M. [1 ,2 ]
Theodoroff, Sarah M. [1 ,3 ]
Grush, Leslie D. [1 ]
Thapa, Samrita [1 ,3 ]
Smith, Brandon D. [1 ,3 ]
Schultz, James [4 ]
Henry, James A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] VA Portland Hlth Care Syst, VA Rehabil Res & Dev RR&D Natl Ctr Rehabil Auditor, Vet Affairs, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, OHSU PSU Sch Publ Hlth, Portland, OR USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Portland, OR USA
[4] Hearing Ctr Excellence HCE, Dept Def, San Antonio, TX USA
关键词
SERVICEMEMBERS EPIDEMIOLOGY; NOISE OUTCOMES; GENDER; SEX;
D O I
10.1044/2022_AJA-22-00140
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: The Tinnitus Screener was introduced in 2015 as a four-item algorith-mic instrument to assess the temporal characteristics of a person's reported tin-nitus. The Tinnitus Screener was then revised as a six-item version to include a new temporal category and to capture tinnitus duration (acute < 6 months vs. chronic >= 6 months). When contrasted with audiologist assessment, the four-item Tinnitus Screener was determined to be highly valid, but the short-term reliability of either version remained unknown. The present analysis focused on determining the test-retest reliability of the six-item Tinnitus Screener. Addition-ally, we sought to determine whether reliability differed by respondent age, sex, military status, and hearing loss. Method: The Tinnitus Screener was administered to 190 military Service mem-bers and 250 military Veterans at two time points separated by 7-31 days. Our analysis focused on test-retest reliability of responses as measured by the kappa coefficient, overall and within subsamples. Percent agreement of tinnitus categori-zation (temporal categories) and classification (positive/negative) between the two time points was also evaluated. Results: Constant or intermittent tinnitus was found in 31% of Service mem-bers and 53% of Veterans. Overall, kappa reliability coefficients were high, near .80, indicating substantial reliability. The majority (96%) of reliability coefficients for the Tinnitus Screener within subsamples were similarly high, ranging from .68 to .88. Conclusions: The updated version of the Tinnitus Screener is shown to be a reliable instrument. The Tinnitus Screener is recommended to inform clinical decision making by determining the temporal characteristics of tinnitus.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 242
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Test-retest reliability of cognitive EEG
    McEvoy, LK
    Smith, ME
    Gevins, A
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 111 (03) : 457 - 463
  • [42] TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY IN POPULATION RESEARCH
    BRACKBILL, Y
    STUDIES IN FAMILY PLANNING, 1974, 5 (08) : 261 - 266
  • [43] Test-retest reliability of functional MRI
    Tallent, KA
    Ramsey, NF
    Frank, JA
    Moonen, CT
    Weinberger, DR
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 31 (3-4) : 12451 - 12451
  • [44] THE TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF QUALITATIVE DATA
    Guttman, Louis
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1946, 11 (02) : 81 - 95
  • [45] Cluster analysis for test-retest Reliability
    Roy, Debdulal Dutta
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 3 (01): : 131 - 139
  • [46] Test-retest reliability in Electroencephalographic Recordings
    Ximena Suarez-Revelo, Jazmin
    Fredy Ochoa-Gomez, John
    Duque-Grajales, Jon
    Montoya-Betancur, Alejandro
    Sanchez-Lopez, Sebastian
    2015 20TH SYMPOSIUM ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, IMAGES AND COMPUTER VISION (STSIVA), 2015,
  • [47] Test-retest reliability of loudness scaling
    Robinson, K
    Gatehouse, S
    EAR AND HEARING, 1996, 17 (02): : 120 - 123
  • [48] TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF THE IDEA INVENTORY
    VESTRE, ND
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1984, 54 (03) : 873 - 874
  • [49] A BASIS FOR ANALYZING TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY
    Guttman, Louis
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1945, 10 (04) : 255 - 282
  • [50] SKEW REDUCES TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY
    DUNLAP, WP
    CHEN, RS
    GREER, T
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 79 (02) : 310 - 313