Histogram analysis of mono-exponential, bi-exponential and stretched-exponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging in predicting consistency of meningiomas

被引:3
|
作者
Zheng, Lingmin [1 ]
Jiang, Peirong [1 ]
Lin, Danjie [1 ]
Chen, Xiaodan [2 ]
Zhong, Tianjin [1 ]
Zhang, Rufei [1 ]
Chen, Jing [3 ]
Song, Yang [4 ]
Xue, Yunjing [1 ]
Lin, Lin [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ Union Hosp, Dept Radiol, Fuzhou 350001, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Fujian Canc Hosp, Clin Oncol Sch, Dept Radiol, Fuzhou 350014, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ Union Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Fuzhou 350001, Peoples R China
[4] Siemens, Healthineers Ltd, MR Sci Mkt, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Fujian Med Univ, Sch Med Technol & Engn, Fuzhou 350004, Peoples R China
关键词
Tumour consistency; Meningioma; Diffusion MRI; Bi-exponential model; Stretched-exponential model; COEFFICIENT; APPEARANCE; PERFUSION; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1186/s40644-023-00633-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The consistency of meningiomas is critical to determine surgical planning and has a significant impact on surgical outcomes. Our aim was to compare mono-exponential, bi-exponential and stretched exponential MR diffusion-weighted imaging in predicting the consistency of meningiomas before surgery.Methods Forty-seven consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed meningiomas were prospectively enrolled in this study. Two senior neurosurgeons independently evaluated tumour consistency and classified them into soft and hard groups. A volume of interest was placed on the preoperative MR diffusion images to outline the whole tumour area. Histogram parameters (mean, median, 10th percentile, 90th percentile, kurtosis, skewness) were extracted from 6 different diffusion maps including ADC (DWI), D*, D, f (IVIM), alpha and DDC (SEM). Comparisons between two groups were made using Student's t-Test or Mann-Whitney U test. Parameters with significant differences between the two groups were included for Receiver operating characteristic analysis. The DeLong test was used to compare AUCs.Results DDC, D* and ADC 10th percentile were significantly lower in hard tumours than in soft tumours (P <= 0.05). The alpha 90th percentile was significantly higher in hard tumours than in soft tumours (P < 0.02). For all histogram parameters, the alpha 90th percentile yielded the highest AUC of 0.88, with an accuracy of 85.10%. The D* 10th percentile had a relatively higher AUC value, followed by the DDC and ADC 10th percentile. The alpha 90th percentile had a significantly greater AUC value than the ADC 10th percentile (P <= 0.05). The D* 10th percentile had a significantly greater AUC value than the ADC 10th percentile and DDC 10th percentile (P <= 0.03).Conclusion Histogram parameters of Alpha and D* may serve as better imaging biomarkers to aid in predicting the consistency of meningioma.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Noninvasively evaluating the grade and IDH mutation status of gliomas by using mono-exponential, bi-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging and three-dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling
    Guo, Da
    Jiang, Binghu
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 160
  • [32] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy Using Mono-, Bi-, and Stretched Exponential Models
    Zhang, Yuanyuan
    Wang, Nan
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 21 (01)
  • [33] Grading of Gliomas by Using Monoexponential, Biexponential, and Stretched Exponential Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging
    Bai, Yan
    Lin, Yusong
    Tian, Jie
    Shi, Dapeng
    Cheng, Jingliang
    Haacke, E. Mark
    Hong, Xiaohua
    Ma, Bo
    Zhou, Jinyuan
    Wang, Meiyun
    RADIOLOGY, 2016, 278 (02) : 496 - 504
  • [34] Histogram analysis from stretched exponential model on diffusion-weighted imaging: evaluation of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Kim, EunJu
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Kim, Hyun Soo
    Jang, Dong Pyo
    Kim, In Young
    Hwang, Jinwoo
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 93 (1106):
  • [35] Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging mono-exponential mode with diffusion kurtosis imaging for predicting pathological grades of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
    Cao, Jinfeng
    Luo, Xin
    Zhou, Zhongmin
    Duan, Yanhua
    Xiao, Lianxiang
    Sun, Xinru
    Shang, Qun
    Gong, Xiao
    Hou, Zhenbo
    Kong, Demin
    He, Bing
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 130
  • [36] Differentiating Cytokeratin 19 expression of hepatocellular carcinoma by using multi-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging with mono-exponential, stretched exponential, intravoxel incoherent motion, diffusion kurtosis imaging and fractional order calculus models
    Guo, Yixian
    Chen, Jiejun
    Zhang, Yunfei
    Guo, Yinglong
    Jiang, Mengmeng
    Dai, Yongming
    Yao, Xiuzhong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 150
  • [37] Grading and proliferation assessment of diffuse astrocytic tumors with monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging
    Zhang, Ju
    Chen, Xiaowei
    Chen, Dong
    Wang, Zhenxiong
    Li, Shihui
    Zhu, Wenzhen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 109 : 188 - 195
  • [38] Comparison of Monoexponential, Biexponential, Stretched-Exponential, and Kurtosis Models of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiation of Renal Solid Masses
    Zhang, Jianjian
    Suo, Shiteng
    Liu, Guiqin
    Zhang, Shan
    Zhao, Zizhou
    Xu, Jianrong
    Wu, Guangyu
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 20 (05) : 791 - 800
  • [39] Stretched-exponential model diffusion-weighted imaging as a potential imaging marker in preoperative grading and assessment of proliferative activity of gliomas
    Chen, Xiaowei
    Jiang, Jingjing
    Shen, Nanxi
    Zhao, Lingyun
    Zhang, Jiaxuan
    Qin, Yuanyuan
    Zhang, Shun
    Li, Li
    Zhu, Wenzhen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 10 (08): : 2659 - 2668
  • [40] Bi-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating high-grade gliomas from solitary brain metastases: a VOI-based histogram analysis
    Yifei Su
    Junhao Wang
    Jinxia Guo
    Xuanchen Liu
    Xiaoxiong Yang
    Rui Cheng
    Chunhong Wang
    Cheng Xu
    Yexin He
    Hongming Ji
    Scientific Reports, 14 (1)