Engineering extracellular vesicles to deliver CRISPR ribonucleoprotein for gene editing

被引:13
|
作者
Whitley, Joseph Andrew [1 ]
Cai, Houjian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut & Biomed Sci, Athens, GA USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut & Biomed Sci, Room 418, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Cas9/sgRNA ribonucleoprotein; CRISPR; delivery; encapsulation; extracellular vesicles; tropism; EXOSOME-MEDIATED DELIVERY; HUMAN-CELLS; ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY; PLASMA-MEMBRANE; TARGET BASE; IN-VITRO; PROTEIN; RNA; SYNCYTIN; DNA;
D O I
10.1002/jev2.12343
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR) is a gene editing tool with tremendous therapeutic potential. Recently, ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex-based CRISPR systems have gained momentum due to their reduction of off-target editing. This has coincided with the emergence of extracellular vesicles (EVs) as a therapeutic delivery vehicle due to its low immunogenicity and high capacity for manipulation. EVs are cell-derived membranous nanoparticles which mediate the intercellular transfer of molecular components. Current technologies achieve CRISPR RNP encapsulation into EVs through EVs biogenesis, thereby avoiding unnecessary physical, chemical or biological manipulations to the vesicles directly. Herein, we identify sixteen EVs-based CRISPR RNP encapsulation strategies, each with distinct genetic features to encapsulate CRISPR RNP. According to the molecular mechanism facilitating the encapsulation process, there are six strategies of encapsulating Cas9 RNP into virus-like particles based on genetic fusion, seven into EVs based on protein tethering, and three based on sgRNA-coupled encapsulation. Additionally, the incorporation of a targeting moiety to the EVs membrane surface through EVs biogenesis confers tropism and increases delivery efficiency to specific cell types. The targeting moieties include viral envelope proteins, recombinant proteins containing a ligand peptide, single-chain fragment variable (scFv) antibodies, and integrins. However, current strategies still have a number of limitations which prevent their use in clinical trials. Among those, the incorporation of viral proteins for encapsulation of Cas9 RNP have raised issues of biocompatibility due to host immune response. Future studies should focus on genetically engineering the EVs without viral proteins, enhancing EVs delivery specificity, and promoting EVs-based homology directed repair. Nevertheless, the integration of CRISPR RNP encapsulation and tropism technologies will provide strategies for the EVs-based delivery of CRISPR RNP in gene therapy and disease treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CRISPR prime editing with ribonucleoprotein complexes in zebrafish and primary human cells
    Petri, Karl
    Zhang, Weiting
    Ma, Junyan
    Schmidts, Andrea
    Lee, Hyunho
    Horng, Joy E.
    Kim, Daniel Y.
    Kurt, Ibrahim C.
    Clement, Kendell
    Hsu, Jonathan Y.
    Pinello, Luca
    Maus, Marcela, V
    Joung, J. Keith
    Yeh, Jing-Ruey Joanna
    NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 40 (02) : 189 - +
  • [42] Highly Efficient Mouse Genome Editing by CRISPR Ribonucleoprotein Electroporation of Zygotes
    Chen, Sean
    Lee, Benjamin
    Lee, Angus Yiu-Fai
    Modzelewski, Andrew J.
    He, Lin
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2016, 291 (28) : 14457 - 14467
  • [43] CRISPR-Cas12a ribonucleoprotein-mediated gene editing in the plant pathogenic fungus Magnaporthe oryzae
    Huang, Jun
    Cook, David E.
    STAR PROTOCOLS, 2022, 3 (01):
  • [44] Non-transgenic gene editing of Citrus sinensis using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes
    Wang, Y.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2018, 108 (10) : 14 - 14
  • [45] Branched endosomal disruptor (BEND) lipids mediate delivery of mRNA and CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex for hepatic gene editing and T cell engineering
    Padilla, Marshall S.
    Mrksich, Kaitlin
    Wang, Yiming
    Haley, Rebecca M.
    Li, Jacqueline J.
    Han, Emily L.
    El-Mayta, Rakan
    Kim, Emily H.
    Dias, Sofia
    Gong, Ningqiang
    Teerdhala, Sridatta V.
    Han, Xuexiang
    Chowdhary, Vivek
    Xue, Lulu
    Siddiqui, Zain
    Yamagata, Hannah M.
    Kim, Dongyoon
    Yoon, Il-Chul
    Wilson, James M.
    Radhakrishnan, Ravi
    Mitchell, Michael J.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2025, 16 (01)
  • [46] Strategies for Engineering of Extracellular Vesicles
    Danilushkina, Anna A.
    Emene, Charles C.
    Barlev, Nicolai A.
    Gomzikova, Marina O.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2023, 24 (17)
  • [47] Controlling Circular RNA Encapsulation within Extracellular Vesicles for Gene Editing and Protein Replacement
    Fang, Liang
    Gu, Wenchao
    Li, Ruoxin
    Chen, Chaoxin
    Cai, Simian
    Luozhong, Sijin
    Chen, Michelle
    Hsu, Annie
    Tsai, Yi-Chih
    Londhe, Ketaki
    Jiang, Shaoyi
    ACS NANO, 2024, 18 (44) : 30378 - 30387
  • [48] Detection of Gene Editing of the Dystonia (DYT1) Mutant Allele with Extracellular Vesicles
    Maalouf, Katia
    Frederick, Dawn M.
    Vaine, Christine A.
    Bragg, D. Cristopher
    Kleinstiver, Benjamin P.
    Breakefield, Xandra O.
    Breyne, Koen
    MOLECULAR THERAPY, 2023, 31 (04) : 753 - 753
  • [49] Responsive MXene nanovehicles deliver CRISPR/Cas12a for boolean logic-controlled gene editing
    Song Wang
    Zhenhua Zhang
    Rui Tang
    Fang He
    Yan Huang
    Zhou Nie
    Chunyang Lei
    Science China(Chemistry), 2022, 65 (11) : 2318 - 2326
  • [50] Gene editing in hemophilia: a "CRISPR" choice?
    Pipe, Steven W.
    Selvaraj, Sundar R.
    BLOOD, 2019, 133 (26) : 2733 - 2734