The impact of agroecosystem on ecological footprint: Fresh evidence in the perspective of existing agriculture and green Pakistan

被引:0
|
作者
Ullah, Arif [1 ]
Salem, Sultan [2 ]
Kang, Shijia [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Educ, Dept Econ, Div Management & Adm Sci, Lahore, Punjab, India
[2] Univ Birmingham, Coll Social Sci, Birmingham Business Sch, Dept Econ, Edgbaston, England
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Chair Agr Prod & Resource Econ, Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
来源
CIENCIA RURAL | 2023年 / 53卷 / 01期
关键词
agroecosystem; ecological footprint; sustainable agriculture; ARDL; and Pakistan; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE; CARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; RENEWABLE ENERGY; COINTEGRATION;
D O I
10.1590/0103-8478cr20210617
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The focus of this research study investigated the impact of agroecosystem on the ecological footprint in Pakistan, using the time series data over the period from 1990 to 2019. The econometric methods of time series were employed to investigate the long-term association between an agroecosystem and ecological footprint. After performing the stationarity tests Johansen approach was employed. Results of the Johansen method imply that long-term co-integration exists between the exogenous and endogenous variables. Moreover, the ARDL model was performed and long-run results were validated by the bound testing approach. The elasticity of the short-run form of the ARDL model reveals that agricultural land, employment, energy consumption, fertilizer use, and biomass burned dry matter in agriculture have a positive relationship with the agroecosystem. In contrast in the log-run form of ARDL agricultural land, employment, energy consumption, fertilizer use in agriculture and temperature have a positive impact on ecological footprint. Results of the impulse response function revealed that employment and fertilizer use in agriculture have positive while energy consumption and livestock in number have a negative influence on the ecological footprint. Thus, rigorous practices of agriculture for higher production put extra pressure on the agroecosystem. As a result, the stability of the agroecosystem deteriorates and reduces. To minimize the ecological ecosystem, modern technology is required to reduce carbon emission, enhance greener production and improve the biocapacity of the land in the country. This study would help the researcher, planner, policymaker and academicians to provide a proper guideline and vision to provide sustainable food and environment.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The asymmetric impact of financial development on ecological footprint in Pakistan
    Gill, Abid Rashid
    Riaz, Rabbia
    Ali, Minhaj
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (11) : 30755 - 30765
  • [2] The asymmetric impact of financial development on ecological footprint in Pakistan
    Abid Rashid Gill
    Rabbia Riaz
    Minhaj Ali
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 30755 - 30765
  • [3] Investigating the Impact of Green Natural Resources and Green Activities on Ecological Footprint: A Perspective of Saudi Vision 2030
    Aziz, Ghazala
    Waheed, Rida
    Alsaggaf, Majid Ibrahim
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [4] Ecological footprint of Rawalpindi; Pakistan's first footprint analysis from urbanization perspective
    Rashid, Audil
    Irum, Ayesha
    Malik, Ikram Ali
    Ashraf, Aniqa
    Liu Rongqiong
    Liu, Guijian
    Ullah, Habib
    Ali, Muhammad Ubaid
    Yousaf, Balal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 170 : 362 - 368
  • [5] Does agriculture, forests, and energy consumption foster the carbon emissions and ecological footprint? fresh evidence from BRICS economies
    Yasin, Iftikhar
    Ahmad, Nawaz
    Amin, Saqib
    Sattar, Nyla
    Hashmat, Afsheen
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [6] Assessing the asymmetric impact of physical infrastructure and trade openness on ecological footprint: An empirical evidence from Pakistan
    Zahra, Samia
    Khan, Dilawar
    Gupta, Rakesh
    Popp, Jozsef
    Olah, Judit
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (07):
  • [7] Assessing the asymmetric impact of physical infrastructure and trade openness on ecological footprint: An empirical evidence from Pakistan
    Zahra, Samia
    Khan, Dilawar
    Gupta, Rakesh
    Popp, Jozsef
    Olah, Judit
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (05):
  • [8] The impact of green technology innovation, environmental taxes, and renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Italy: Fresh evidence from novel dynamic ARDL simulations
    Javed, Aamir
    Rapposelli, Agnese
    Khan, Feroz
    Javed, Asif
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2023, 191
  • [9] Investigating the ecological footprint and green finance: evidence from emerging economies
    Vardar, Gulin
    Aydogan, Berna
    Gurel, Beyza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2023,
  • [10] Ecological Footprint and Willingness to Pay for Green Goods: Evidence from the Netherlands
    De Silva, Dakshina G.
    Head, Tiffany
    Pownall, Rachel A. J.
    Schiller, Anita R.
    [J]. ENERGY JOURNAL, 2024, 45 (01): : 257 - 285