Customer concentration, managerial risk aversion, and independent directors: A quasi-natural experiment

被引:5
|
作者
Chatjuthamard, Pattanaporn [1 ]
Kijkasiwat, Ploypailin [2 ]
Jiraporn, Pornsit [3 ]
Lee, Sang Mook [3 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Ctr Excellence Management Res Corp Governance & B, Sasin Sch Management, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Business Adm & Accountancy, Khon Kaen, Thailand
[3] Penn State Univ, Great Valley Sch Grad Profess Studies, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
Customer concentration; Board independence; Independent directors; Sarbanes-Oxley; Quasi -natural experiment; Exogenous shock; SARBANES-OXLEY-ACT; BOARD INDEPENDENCE; BASE CONCENTRATION; CEO COMPENSATION; DETERMINANTS; CONSEQUENCES; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; WEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.qref.2022.10.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Exploiting a quasi-natural experiment based on an exogenous regulatory shock, we explore the effect of board independence on customer concentration. Our difference-in-difference estimates reveal that stronger board independence raises customer concentration. Specifically, a majority of independent directors on the board raise customer concentration by 12.98%- 32.43%. Motivated by managerial risk aversion, managers are in favor of lower customer concentration, resulting in a sub-optimal level of risk-taking. More effective governance in the form of more independent directors increases customer concentration, bringing it closer to the level consistent with shareholder wealth maximization. Additional analysis including propensity score matching and entropy balancing validates the results. Our study is the first to examine the effect of independent directors on customer concentration.(C) 2022 Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 368
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effect of board independence on dividend payouts: A quasi-natural experiment
    Chintrakarn, Pandej
    Jiraporn, Pornsit
    Treepongkaruna, Sirimon
    Lee, Sang Mook
    [J]. NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2022, 63
  • [32] Shareholder litigation rights and ESG controversies: A quasi-natural experiment
    Treepongkaruna, Sirimon
    Kyaw, Khine
    Jiraporn, Pornsit
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 84
  • [33] IMPACTS OF MANDATORY GE FOOD LABELING: A QUASI-NATURAL EXPERIMENT
    Carter, Colin A.
    Schaefer, K. Aleks
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 101 (01) : 58 - 73
  • [34] Recentralization and self-employment: A quasi-natural experiment in Switzerland
    Patel, Pankaj C.
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2022, 43 (05) : 1379 - 1402
  • [35] Honours as a signal - evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in Italy
    Toepfer, Marina
    [J]. ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2019, 39 (01): : 1 - 7
  • [36] Limits on executive pay and stock price crash risk: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment
    Bai, Min
    Wang, Renxiang
    Yu, Chia-Feng
    Zheng, Jianming
    [J]. PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2019, 55 : 206 - 221
  • [37] A serendipitous, quasi-natural experiment: earthquake risk perceptions and hazard adjustments among college students
    Greer, Alex
    Wu, Hao-Che
    Murphy, Haley
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2018, 93 (02) : 987 - 1011
  • [38] Does shareholder litigation risk promote or hinder corporate social responsibility? A quasi-natural experiment
    Jaroenjitrkam, Anutchanat
    Treepongkaruna, Sirimon
    Jiraporn, Pornsit
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 29 (03) : 657 - 674
  • [39] Bankruptcy judicial system reform and corporate financial litigation risk: A quasi-natural experiment in China
    Lai, Jieji
    Hu, Shiyang
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 62
  • [40] The implications of daylight saving time: A quasi-natural experiment on cognitive performance and risk taking behaviour
    Schaffner, Markus
    Sarkar, Jayanta
    Torgler, Benno
    Dulleck, Uwe
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2018, 70 : 390 - 400