Bacteremia in Severe Mastitis of Dairy Cows

被引:7
|
作者
Krebs, Isabel [1 ]
Zhang, Yanchao [1 ]
Wente, Nicole [1 ]
Leimbach, Stefanie [1 ]
Kroemker, Volker [2 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Univ Appl Sci & Arts, Dept Bioproc Engn, Microbiol, Fac 2, D-30453 Hannover, Germany
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Vet & Anim Sci, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
关键词
severe mastitis; dairy cow; bacteremia; blood culture; pathogen shedding; ACUTE COLIFORM MASTITIS; CLINICAL MASTITIS; PATHOGENESIS; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; HERDS;
D O I
10.3390/microorganisms11071639
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the occurrence of bacteremia in severe mastitis cases of dairy cows. Milk and corresponding blood samples of 77 cases of severe mastitis were bacteriologically examined. All samples (milk and blood) were incubated aerobically and anaerobically to also investigate the role of obligate anaerobic microorganisms in addition to aerobic microorganisms in severe mastitis. Bacteremia occurred if identical bacterial strains were isolated from milk and blood samples of the same case. In addition, pathogen shedding was examined, and the data of animals and weather were collected to determine associated factors for the occurrence of bacteremia in severe mastitis. If Gram-negative bacteria were detected in milk samples, a Limulus test (detection of endotoxins) was also performed for corresponding blood samples without the growth of Gram-negative bacteria. In 74 cases (96.1%), microbial growth was detected in aerobically incubated milk samples. The most-frequently isolated bacteria in milk samples were Escherichia (E.) coli (48.9%), Streptococcus (S.) spp. (18.1%), and Klebsiella (K.) spp. (16%). Obligatory anaerobic microorganisms were not isolated. In 72 cases (93.5%) of the aerobically examined blood samples, microbial growth was detected. The most-frequently isolated pathogens in blood samples were non-aureus Staphylococci (NaS) (40.6%) and Bacillus spp. (12.3%). The Limulus test was positive for 60.5% of cases, which means a detection of endotoxins in most blood samples without the growth of Gram-negative bacteria. Bacteremia was confirmed in 12 cases (15.5%) for K. pneumoniae (5/12), E. coli (4/12), S. dysgalactiae (2/12), and S. uberis (1/12). The mortality rate (deceased or culled) was 66.6% for cases with bacteremia and 34.1% for cases without bacteremia. High pathogen shedding and high humidity were associated with the occurrence of bacteremia in severe mastitis.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Are Severe Mastitis Cases in Dairy Cows Associated with Bacteremia?
    Brennecke, Julia
    Falkenberg, Ulrike
    Wente, Nicole
    Kromker, Volker
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (02): : 1 - 9
  • [2] Bacteremia associated with naturally occurring acute coliform mastitis in dairy cows
    Wenz, JR
    Barrington, GM
    Garry, FB
    McSweeney, KD
    Dinsmore, RP
    Goodell, G
    Callan, RJ
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 219 (07) : 976 - 981
  • [3] Mastitis in Dairy cows
    不详
    TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR DIERGENEESKUNDE, 2012, 137 (06) : 362 - 362
  • [4] Tackling mastitis in dairy cows
    Rainard, P
    NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2005, 23 (04) : 430 - 432
  • [5] Staphylococcal mastitis in dairy cows
    Dego, Oudessa Kerro
    Vidlund, Jessica
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2024, 11
  • [6] Preface Mastitis in Dairy Cows
    Ruegg, Pamela L.
    VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-FOOD ANIMAL PRACTICE, 2012, 28 (02) : XI - XII
  • [7] Tackling mastitis in dairy cows
    Pascal Rainard
    Nature Biotechnology, 2005, 23 : 430 - 432
  • [8] MASTITIS IN DAIRY-COWS
    JARRETT, JA
    VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-LARGE ANIMAL PRACTICE, 1981, 3 (02): : 447 - 454
  • [9] Mastitis in Dairy Cows Preface
    Ruegg, Pamela L.
    Petersson-Wolfe, Christina S.
    VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-FOOD ANIMAL PRACTICE, 2018, 34 (03) : IX - X
  • [10] Mastitis in dairy cows - Control of mastitis in organic dairy operations is possible
    Echevarria, L
    Roussel, P
    POINT VETERINAIRE, 2003, 34 (239): : 10 - 11