Racial Disparities in Prostate Cancer Screening: The Role of Shared Decision Making

被引:5
|
作者
Frego, Nicola [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Beatrici, Edoardo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Labban, Muhieddine [1 ,2 ]
Stone, Benjamin V. [1 ,2 ]
Filipas, Dejan K. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Koelker, Mara [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Lughezzani, Giovanni [3 ]
Buffi, Nicolo M. [5 ]
Osman, Nora Y. [5 ]
Lipsitz, Stuart R. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Sammon, Jesse D. [6 ,7 ]
Kibel, Adam S. [1 ,2 ]
Trinh, Quoc-Dien [1 ,2 ]
Cole, Alexander P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Urol Surg, 45 Francis St,ASB 2-3, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Surg & Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Humanitas Res Hosp IRSSC, Dept Urol, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Hamburg, Germany
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Harvard Med Sch, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Maine Med Ctr, Div Urol, Portland, ME USA
[7] Maine Med Ctr, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat CORE, Portland, ME USA
关键词
PATIENT; CARE; PATTERNS; COMMUNICATION; DISCUSSIONS; ATTITUDES; MORTALITY; RATINGS; GENDER; RACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2023.08.005
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: The 2018 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations endorsed shared decision making for men aged 55-69 years, encouraging consideration of patient race/ethnicity for prostate-specific antigen screening. This study aimed to assess whether a proxy shared decision-making variable modified the impact of race/ethnicity on the likelihood of prostate-specific antigen screening.Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of men aged between 55 and 69 years, who responded to the prostate-specific antigen screening portions of the 2020 U.S.-based Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey, was performed between September and December 2022. Complex sample multivariable logistic regression models with an interaction term combining race and estimated shared decision making were used to test whether shared decision making modified the impact of race/ethnicity on screening.Results: Of a weighted sample of 26.8 million men eligible for prostate-specific antigen screening, 25.7% (6.9 million) reported for prostate-specific antigen screening. In adjusted analysis, estimated shared decision making was a significant predictor of prostate-specific antigen screening (AOR=2.65, 95% CI=2.36, 2.98, p<0.001). The interaction between race/ethnicity and estimated shared decision making on the receipt of prostate-specific antigen screening was significant (p(int)=0.001). Among those who did not report estimated shared decision making, both non-Hispanic Black (OR=0.77, 95% CI=0.61, 0.97, p=0.026) and Hispanic (OR=0.51, 95% CI=0.39, 0.68, p<0.001) men were significantly less likely to undergo prostate-specific antigen screening than non-Hispanic White men. On the contrary, among respondents who reported estimated shared decision making, no race-based differences in prostate-specific antigen screening were found.Conclusions: Although much disparities research focuses on race-based differences in prostate-specific antigen screening, research on strategies to mitigate these disparities is needed. Shared decision making might attenuate the impact of race/ethnic disparities on the likelihood of prostate-specific antigen screening.(c) 2023 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:27 / 36
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Health literacy and shared decision making in prostate cancer screening: Equality versus equity
    Washington, Samuel L., III
    Master, Viraj A.
    CANCER, 2021, 127 (02) : 181 - 183
  • [32] Prevalence of Shared Decision-making in Prostate Cancer Screening in New York State
    Lindsey J. Mattick
    Kofi Biney
    Heather M. Dacus
    Gina M. O’Sullivan
    Heather M. Ochs-Balcom
    Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 2023, 25 : 1207 - 1210
  • [33] PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING: IMPLEMENTATION OF A SHARED DECISION-MAKING TOOL FOR PATIENT CONVERSATIONS
    Killeen, Colin
    Misra-Hebert, Anita D.
    Goto, Toyomi
    Fox, Jacqueline
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (SUPPL 1) : S683 - S684
  • [34] Shared Decision Making for Prostate Cancer Screening Do Patients or Clinicians Have a Choice?
    Woolf, Steven H.
    Krist, Alex
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 169 (17) : 1557 - 1559
  • [35] Prevalence of Shared Decision-making in Prostate Cancer Screening in New York State
    Mattick, Lindsey J.
    Biney, Kofi
    Dacus, Heather M.
    O'Sullivan, Gina M.
    Ochs-Balcom, Heather M.
    JOURNAL OF IMMIGRANT AND MINORITY HEALTH, 2023, 25 (05) : 1207 - 1210
  • [36] "Shared decision-making" for prostate cancer screening: Is it a marker of quality preventative healthcare?
    Golijanin, Borivoj
    Bhatt, Vikas
    Homer, Alexander
    Malshy, Kamil
    Ochsner, Anna
    Wales, Rebecca
    Khaleel, Sari
    Mega, Anthony
    Pareek, Gyan
    Hyams, Elias
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 88
  • [37] Does shared decision making increase prostate screening uptake in countries with a low prevalence of prostate cancer?
    Amin, Hussein Saad
    Arafa, Mostafafa Ahmed
    Farhat, Karim Hamda
    Rabah, Danny Munther
    Altaweel, Abdulaziz Abdullah
    Alhammad, Abdulaziz Hamed
    AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 20 (04) : 1870 - 1874
  • [38] A decision aid versus shared decision making for prostate cancer screening results of a randomized, controlled trial
    Stamm, Andrew W.
    Banerji, John S.
    Wolff, Erika M.
    Slee, April
    Akapame, Sydney
    Dahl, Kathryn
    Massman, John D., III
    Soung, Michael C.
    Pittenger, Kim R.
    Corman, John M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (04) : 8910 - 8917
  • [39] The role of place in racial disparities in prostate cancer treatment
    Hammarlund, Noah
    Lee, Jenney
    Wolff, Erika
    Holt, Sarah
    Etzioni, Ruth
    Gore, John
    Nyame, Yaw A.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2023, 32 (01) : 192 - 193
  • [40] SHARED DECISION MAKING FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS
    Jayadevappa, Ravishankar
    Chhatre, Sumedha
    Guzzo, Thomas
    Malkowicz, S. Bruce
    Schwartz, J. Sanford
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E889 - E890