Racial Disparities in Prostate Cancer Screening: The Role of Shared Decision Making

被引:5
|
作者
Frego, Nicola [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Beatrici, Edoardo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Labban, Muhieddine [1 ,2 ]
Stone, Benjamin V. [1 ,2 ]
Filipas, Dejan K. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Koelker, Mara [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Lughezzani, Giovanni [3 ]
Buffi, Nicolo M. [5 ]
Osman, Nora Y. [5 ]
Lipsitz, Stuart R. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Sammon, Jesse D. [6 ,7 ]
Kibel, Adam S. [1 ,2 ]
Trinh, Quoc-Dien [1 ,2 ]
Cole, Alexander P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Urol Surg, 45 Francis St,ASB 2-3, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Surg & Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Humanitas Res Hosp IRSSC, Dept Urol, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Hamburg, Germany
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Harvard Med Sch, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Maine Med Ctr, Div Urol, Portland, ME USA
[7] Maine Med Ctr, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat CORE, Portland, ME USA
关键词
PATIENT; CARE; PATTERNS; COMMUNICATION; DISCUSSIONS; ATTITUDES; MORTALITY; RATINGS; GENDER; RACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2023.08.005
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: The 2018 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations endorsed shared decision making for men aged 55-69 years, encouraging consideration of patient race/ethnicity for prostate-specific antigen screening. This study aimed to assess whether a proxy shared decision-making variable modified the impact of race/ethnicity on the likelihood of prostate-specific antigen screening.Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of men aged between 55 and 69 years, who responded to the prostate-specific antigen screening portions of the 2020 U.S.-based Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey, was performed between September and December 2022. Complex sample multivariable logistic regression models with an interaction term combining race and estimated shared decision making were used to test whether shared decision making modified the impact of race/ethnicity on screening.Results: Of a weighted sample of 26.8 million men eligible for prostate-specific antigen screening, 25.7% (6.9 million) reported for prostate-specific antigen screening. In adjusted analysis, estimated shared decision making was a significant predictor of prostate-specific antigen screening (AOR=2.65, 95% CI=2.36, 2.98, p<0.001). The interaction between race/ethnicity and estimated shared decision making on the receipt of prostate-specific antigen screening was significant (p(int)=0.001). Among those who did not report estimated shared decision making, both non-Hispanic Black (OR=0.77, 95% CI=0.61, 0.97, p=0.026) and Hispanic (OR=0.51, 95% CI=0.39, 0.68, p<0.001) men were significantly less likely to undergo prostate-specific antigen screening than non-Hispanic White men. On the contrary, among respondents who reported estimated shared decision making, no race-based differences in prostate-specific antigen screening were found.Conclusions: Although much disparities research focuses on race-based differences in prostate-specific antigen screening, research on strategies to mitigate these disparities is needed. Shared decision making might attenuate the impact of race/ethnic disparities on the likelihood of prostate-specific antigen screening.(c) 2023 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 36
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Disparities Associated with Shared Decision-making in Prostate Cancer Screening
    Basin, Michael F.
    Crane, Kelly
    Basnet, Alina
    Chandrasekar, Thenappan
    Shapiro, Oleg
    Jacob, Joseph M.
    Bratslavsky, Gennady
    Goldberg, Hanan
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2023, 9 (06): : 1008 - 1015
  • [2] DISPARITIES REGARDING SHARED DECISION-MAKING IN PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING
    Basin, Michael
    Basnet, Alina
    Shapiro, Oleg
    Jacob, Joseph
    Bratslavsky, Gennady
    Goldberg, Hanan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E339 - E340
  • [3] Racial Disparities in Patient Perspectives on Shared Decision Making in Prostate Cancer Screening Following 2018 Guideline Changes
    Riviere, P.
    Kalavacherla, S.
    Banegas, M.
    Martinez, M. E.
    Garraway, I.
    Murphy, J. D.
    Rose, B. S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : S73 - S74
  • [4] Shared decision making in prostate cancer screening An update
    Tse, Tim
    Wu, Bosco
    Vagholkar, Sanjyot
    Willcock, Simon
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2023, 52 (03) : 99 - 101
  • [5] RACIAL AND ETHNIC VARIATION OF SHARED DECISION MAKING IN PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING FOLLOWING UPDATED 2018 SCREENING GUIDELINES
    VanderVeer-Harris, Nathan
    Zippi, Zachary
    Patel, Dev
    Manoharan, Murugesan
    Vaidean, Georgeta
    Caso, Jorge
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E393 - E393
  • [6] Prostate Cancer Screening Shared Decision-Making for Screening and Treatment
    Blackwelder, Russ
    Chessman, Alexander
    [J]. PRIMARY CARE, 2019, 46 (01): : 149 - +
  • [7] Moving Towards Shared Decision Making in Prostate Cancer Screening
    Richard M. Hoffman
    Deborah L. Helitzer
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2007, 22 : 1056 - 1057
  • [8] Moving towards shared decision making in prostate cancer screening
    Hoffman, Richard M.
    Helitzer, Deborah L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 22 (07) : 1056 - 1057
  • [9] SHARED DECISION MAKING FOR PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING: REALITY OR FARCE?
    Pucheril, Daniel
    Fletcher, Sean A.
    Berg, Sebastian
    Cole, Alexander P.
    Zlatev, Dimitar
    Chang, Steven L.
    Sammon, Jesse
    Menon, Mani
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E1105 - E1105
  • [10] Shared decision making for prostate cancer screening: Reality or farce?
    Pucheril, Daniel
    Fletcher, Sean A.
    Zlatev, Dimitar V.
    Mossanen, Matthew
    Ingham, Matthew D.
    Chang, Steven Lee
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Trinh, Quoc-Dien
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (06)