The fiscal implications of stringent climate policy

被引:1
|
作者
Tol, Richard S. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Dept Econ, Falmer, England
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ, Dept Spatial Econ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Tinbergen Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] CESifo, Munich, Germany
[6] Payne Inst Publ Policy, Colorado Sch Mines, Golden, CO USA
[7] Abu Dhabi Univ, Coll Business, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[8] Jubilee Bldg, Brighton BN1 9SL, England
关键词
Climate policy; RISK PERCEPTION; CARBON CONTENT; CO2; EMISSIONS; TAXATION; COST; TRANSITION; EFFICIENCY; AFRICA; KYOTO;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2023.09.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Stringent climate policy compatible with the targets of the 2015 Paris Agreement would pose a substantial fiscal challenge. Reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 95% or more by 2050 would raise 7% (1%-17%) of GDP in carbon tax revenue, half of current, global tax revenue. Revenues are relatively larger in poorer regions. Subsidies for carbon dioxide sequestration would amount to 6.6% (0.3-7.1%) of GDP. These numbers are conservative as they were estimated using models that assume first-best climate policy implementation and ignore the costs of raising revenue. The fiscal challenge rapidly shrinks if emission targets are relaxed.(c) 2023 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 504
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy
    Tomoko Hasegawa
    Shinichiro Fujimori
    Petr Havlík
    Hugo Valin
    Benjamin Leon Bodirsky
    Jonathan C. Doelman
    Thomas Fellmann
    Page Kyle
    Jason F. L. Koopman
    Hermann Lotze-Campen
    Daniel Mason-D’Croz
    Yuki Ochi
    Ignacio Pérez Domínguez
    Elke Stehfest
    Timothy B. Sulser
    Andrzej Tabeau
    Kiyoshi Takahashi
    Jun’ya Takakura
    Hans van Meijl
    Willem-Jan van Zeist
    Keith Wiebe
    Peter Witzke
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8 : 699 - 703
  • [42] Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy
    Hasegawa, Tomoko
    Fujimori, Shinichiro
    Havlik, Petr
    Valin, Hugo
    Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon
    Doelman, Jonathan C.
    Fellmann, Thomas
    Kyle, Page
    Koopman, Jason F. L.
    Lotze-Campen, Hermann
    Mason-D'Croz, Daniel
    Ochi, Yuki
    Perez Dominguez, Ignacio
    Stehfest, Elke
    Sulser, Timothy B.
    Tabeau, Andrzej
    Takahashi, Kiyoshi
    Takakura, Jun'ya
    van Meijl, Hans
    van Zeist, Willem-Jan
    Wiebe, Keith
    Witzke, Peter
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2018, 8 (08) : 699 - +
  • [43] Downsizing of a provincial department of health - Causes and implications for fiscal policy
    Blecher, M
    [J]. SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 92 (06): : 449 - 455
  • [45] How significant are fiscal interactions in climate policy design? A CGE analysis
    Proenca, Sara
    Fortes, Patricia
    [J]. 2016 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE EUROPEAN ENERGY MARKET (EEM), 2016,
  • [46] Fiscal and Budgetary Policy Efforts towards Climate Change Mitigation in Romania
    Florea, Nicoleta Mihaela
    Meghisan-Toma, Georgeta-Madalina
    Puiu, Silvia
    Meghisan, Flaviu
    Doran, Marius Dalian
    Niculescu, Mariana
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (05) : 1 - 18
  • [47] Implications of potentially lower climate sensitivity on climate projections and policy
    Rogelj, Joeri
    Meinshausen, Malte
    Sedlacek, Jan
    Knutti, Reto
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [48] Exploring representations of climate change as ecocide: implications for climate policy
    Proedrou, Filippos
    Pournara, Maria
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2024,
  • [49] Fiscal Policy
    Auerbach, Alan J.
    [J]. EVOLUTION OR REVOLUTION?: RETHINKING MACROECONOMIC POLICY AFTER THE GREAT RECESSION, 2019, : 81 - 103
  • [50] Fiscal Policy
    Roubini, Nouriel
    [J]. WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED?: MACROECONOMIC POLICY AFTER THE CRISIS, 2014, : 209 - 222