Cochrane Update: a new American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM feature to highlight Cochrane meta-analyses

被引：0
|
作者：
Berghella, Vincenzo [1 ]
机构：
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Maternal Fetal Med Fellowship Program, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
来源：
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM | 2023年 / 5卷 / 06期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100904
中图分类号：
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号：
100211 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The normality assumption on between-study random effects was questionable in a considerable number of Cochrane meta-analyses
    Ziyu Liu
    Fahad M. Al Amer
    Mengli Xiao
    Chang Xu
    Luis Furuya-Kanamori
    Hwanhee Hong
    Lianne Siegel
    Lifeng Lin
    BMC Medicine, 21
  • [32] Improvement needed in the network geometry and inconsistency of Cochrane network meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey
    Gao, Ya
    Ge, Long
    Ma, Xueni
    Shen, Xiping
    Liu, Meng
    Tian, Jinhui
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 113 : 214 - 227
  • [33] Cochrane reviews v industry supported meta-analyses - We should read all reviews with caution
    Coyne, James C.
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7574): : 916 - 916
  • [34] Sex based subgroup differences in randomized controlled trials: empirical evidence from Cochrane meta-analyses
    Wallach, Joshua D.
    Sullivan, Patrick G.
    Trepanowski, John F.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 355
  • [35] The aprotinin saga and the risks of conducting meta-analyses on small randomised controlled trials – a critique of a Cochrane review
    Måns Rosén
    BMC Health Services Research, 9
  • [36] Empirical comparison of univariate and multivariate meta-analyses in Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth reviews with multiple binary outcomes
    Price, Malcolm J.
    Blake, Helen A.
    Kenyon, Sara
    White, Ian R.
    Jackson, Dan
    Kirkham, Jamie J.
    Neilson, James P.
    Deeks, Jonathan J.
    Riley, Richard D.
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2019, 10 (03) : 440 - 451
  • [37] The aprotinin saga and the risks of conducting meta-analyses on small randomised controlled trials - a critique of a Cochrane review
    Rosen, Mans
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2009, 9
  • [38] Cochrane reviews v industry supported meta-analyses - Ten questions to assess bias in medical research
    Gogol, Manfred
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7574): : 916 - 917
  • [39] Commentary on the Supplement American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology: A Hormonal Contraceptive Update: A Decade of Innovation and Transformation
    Krychman, Michael
    Spadt, Susan Kellogg
    Burrows, Lara J.
    Johnson-Agbakwu, Crista
    Goldstein, Irwin
    Goldstein, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (08): : 2196 - 2197
  • [40] Evidence for differences in patterns of temporal trends in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies in the Cochrane database of systematic reviews
    Murphy, Jacqueline
    Fanshawe, Thomas R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 174
12345