A Novel Representation of Audiological and Subjective Findings for Acoustical, Bone Conduction and Direct Drive Hearing Solutions

被引:0
|
作者
Sprinzl, Georg Mathias [1 ,2 ]
Magele, Astrid [1 ,2 ]
Schoerg, Philipp [1 ,2 ]
Hagen, Rudolf [3 ]
Rak, Kristen [3 ]
Kurz, Anja [3 ]
Van de Heyning, Paul [4 ]
Calvino, Miryam [5 ]
Lassaletta, Luis [5 ]
Gavilan, Javier [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Clin St Poelten, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Dunant Pl 1, A-3100 Polten, Austria
[2] Karl Landsteiner Inst Implantable Hearing Devices, A-3100 St Polten, Austria
[3] Univ Wurzburg, Comprehens Hearing Ctr, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Josef Schneider Str 11, D-97080 Wurzburg, Germany
[4] Antwerp Univ Hosp, ENT Dept, Wilrijkstr 10, B-2650 Antwerp, Belgium
[5] La Paz Univ Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Madrid 28046, Spain
来源
JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE | 2023年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
bone conduction implant; hearing aids; ROUND WINDOW APPLICATION; MIDDLE-EAR IMPLANT; SPEECH; QUALITIES; OUTCOMES; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3390/jpm13030462
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The benefit of hearing rehabilitation is often measured using audiological tests or subjective questionnaires/interviews. It is important to consider both aspects in order to evaluate the overall benefits. Currently, there is no standardized method for reporting combined audiological and patient reported subjective outcome measures in clinical practice. Therefore, this study focuses on showing the patient's audiological, as well as subjective outcomes in one graph using data from an existing study. Method: The present paper illustrated a graph presenting data on four quadrants with audiological and subjective findings. These quadrants represented speech comprehension in quiet (unaided vs. aided) as WRS% at 65 dB SPL, speech recognition in noise (unaided vs. aided) as SRT dB SNR, sound field threshold (unaided vs. aided) as PTA(4) in dB HL, wearing time and patient satisfaction questionnaire results. Results: As an example, the HEARRING graph in this paper represented audiological and subjective datasets on a single patient level or a cohort of patients for an active bone conduction hearing implant solution. The graph offered the option to follow the user's performance in time. Conclusion: The HEARRING graph allowed representation of a combination of audiological measures with patient reported outcomes in one single graph, indicating the overall benefit of the intervention. In addition, the correlation and consistency between some results (e.g., aided threshold and aided WRS) can be better visualized. Those users who lacked performance benefits on one or more parameters and called for further insight could be visually identified.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Audiological outcomes in patients with congenital aural atresia implanted with transcutaneous active bone conduction hearing implant
    Zernotti, M. E.
    Chiaraviglio, M. M.
    Mauricio, S. B.
    Tabernero, P. A.
    Zernotti, M.
    Di Gregorio, M. F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 119 : 54 - 58
  • [32] Piezoelectric Bone Conduction Hearing Implant: A Case Series of Audiological, Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Vagle, Mai
    Bille, Michael
    Gordon Jensen, Ramon
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (11)
  • [33] The Functional Hearing Gain with an Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant Does Not Correlate with the Subjective Hearing Performance
    Auinger, Alice B.
    Liepins, Rudolfs
    Brkic, Faris E.
    Vyskocil, Erich
    Arnoldner, Christoph
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (07):
  • [34] Audiological results and subjective benefit of an active transcutaneous bone-conduction device in patients with congenital aural atresia
    Volgger, Veronika
    Schiessler, Inge Teresa
    Mueller, Joachim
    Schroetzlmair, Florian
    Pollotzek, Marlene
    Hempel, John Martin
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 279 (5) : 2345 - 2352
  • [35] Investigation of a Novel Completely-in-the-Canal Direct-Drive Hearing Device: A Temporal Bone Study
    Mahboubi, Hossein
    Paulick, Peyton
    Kiumehr, Saman
    Merlo, Mark
    Bachman, Mark
    Djalilian, Hamid Reza
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2013, 34 (01) : 115 - 120
  • [36] Does the bone-anchored hearing aid have a complementary effect on audiological and subjective outcomes in patients with unilateral conductive hearing loss?
    Hol, MKS
    Snik, AFM
    Mylanus, EAM
    Cremers, CWRJ
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2005, 10 (03) : 159 - 168
  • [37] Audiological results and subjective benefit of an active transcutaneous bone-conduction device in patients with congenital aural atresia
    Veronika Volgger
    Inge Teresa Schießler
    Joachim Müller
    Florian Schrötzlmair
    Marlene Pollotzek
    John Martin Hempel
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2022, 279 : 2345 - 2352
  • [38] Retrospective audiological analysis of bone conduction versus round window vibratory stimulation in patients with mixed hearing loss
    Mojallal, Hamidreza
    Schwab, Burkard
    Hinze, Anna-Lena
    Giere, Thomas
    Lenarz, Thomas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2015, 54 (06) : 391 - 400
  • [39] Audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: Six-month results from a multicentre study
    den Besten, Christine A.
    Monksfield, Peter
    Bosman, Arjan
    Skarzynski, Piotr H.
    Green, Kevin
    Runge, Christina
    Wigren, Stina
    Blechert, Johan I.
    Flynn, Mark C.
    Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
    Hol, Myrthe K. S.
    CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 44 (02) : 144 - 157
  • [40] Audiological outcome measures with the BONEBRIDGE transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: impact of noise, reverberation and signal processing features
    Curca, Ioan A.
    Parsa, Vijay
    Macpherson, Ewan A.
    Scollie, Susan
    Vansevenant, Katherine
    Zimmerman, Kim
    Lewis-Teeter, Jamie
    Allen, Prudence
    Parnes, Lorne
    Agrawal, Sumit
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2020, 59 (07) : 556 - 565