Differences in visual stimulation between reading and walking and implications for myopia development

被引:3
|
作者
Poudel, Sabina [1 ]
Rahimi-Nasrabadi, Hamed [1 ]
Jin, Jianzhong [1 ]
Najafian, Sohrab [1 ]
Alonso, Jose-Manuel [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Coll Optometry, Dept Biol & Visual Sci, New York, NY 10036 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF VISION | 2023年 / 23卷 / 04期
关键词
RETINAL GANGLION-CELLS; TIME SPENT OUTDOORS; EYE GROWTH; REFRACTIVE COMPENSATION; OPTOKINETIC REFLEX; RECEPTIVE-FIELDS; SPECTACLE LENSES; NEAR-WORK; SCHOOL; ASYMMETRY;
D O I
10.1167/jov.23.4.3
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Visual input plays an important role in the development of myopia (nearsightedness), a visual disorder that blurs vision at far distances. The risk of myopia progression increases with the time spent reading and decreases with outdoor activity for reasons that remain poorly understood. To investigate the stimulus parameters driving this disorder, we compared the visual input to the retina of humans performing two tasks associated with different risks of myopia progression, reading and walking. Human subjects performed the two tasks while wearing glasses with cameras and sensors that recorded visual scenes and visuomotor activity. When compared with walking, reading black text in white background reduced spatiotemporal contrast in central vision and increased it in peripheral vision, leading to a pronounced reduction in the ratio of central/peripheral strength of visual stimulation. It also made the luminance distribution heavily skewed toward negative dark contrast in central vision and positive light contrast in peripheral vision, decreasing the central/peripheral stimulation ratio of ON visual pathways. It also decreased fixation distance, blink rate, pupil size, and head-eye coordination reflexes dominated by ON pathways. Taken together with previous work, these results support the hypothesis that reading drives myopia progression by understimulating ON visual pathways.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influence of vestibular and visual stimulation on split-belt walking
    B. Marques
    G. Colombo
    R. Müller
    M. R. Dürsteler
    V. Dietz
    D. Straumann
    Experimental Brain Research, 2007, 183 : 457 - 463
  • [22] Influence of vestibular and visual stimulation on split-belt walking
    Marques, B.
    Colombo, G.
    Mueller, R.
    Duersteler, M. R.
    Dietz, V.
    Straumann, D.
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 183 (04) : 457 - 463
  • [23] AGE DIFFERENCES IN EEG RESPONSE TO VISUAL STIMULATION
    WILSON, S
    OBRIST, WD
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1964, 17 (04): : 455 - &
  • [24] Rhythmic proprioceptive stimulation improves embodiment in a walking avatar when added to visual stimulation
    Kouakoua, Kean
    Duclos, Cyril
    Aissaoui, Rachid
    Nadeau, Sylvie
    Labbe, David R.
    2020 IEEE CONFERENCE ON VIRTUAL REALITY AND 3D USER INTERFACES WORKSHOPS (VRW 2020), 2020, : 573 - 574
  • [25] Visual and cognitive determinants of reading development
    Radach, Ralph
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 541 - 541
  • [26] The research of differences in hip angle between treadmill walking and ground walking
    Zhao, Lingyan
    Huang, Shougang
    Li, Jin
    Sui, Liming
    Yu, Lingtao
    2014 SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND DESIGN (ISCID 2014), VOL 1, 2014, : 433 - 436
  • [27] THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SPEED READING AND SKIMMING
    JUST, M
    MASSON, M
    CARPENTER, PA
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1980, 16 (03) : 171 - 171
  • [28] Histologic differences between primary high myopia and secondary high myopia due to congenital glaucoma
    Jonas, Jost B.
    Holbach, Leonard
    Panda-Jonas, Songhomitra
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2016, 94 (02) : 147 - 153
  • [29] Metatheoretical Differences between Running Records and Miscue Analysis: Implications for Analysis of Oral Reading Behaviors
    Harmey, Sinead
    Kabuto, Bobbie
    RESEARCH IN THE TEACHING OF ENGLISH, 2018, 53 (01) : 11 - 33
  • [30] CORRELATION BETWEEN DEGREE OF MYOPIA AND VISUAL ACUITY WITHOUT CORRECTION
    SERGIENK.NM
    VESTNIK OFTALMOLOGII, 1974, (01) : 38 - 40