The FDA's latest draft guidance on accelerated approvals - one step forward, two steps back?

被引:6
|
作者
Benjamin, David J. [1 ]
Lythgoe, Mark P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hoag Family Canc Inst, Newport Beach, CA USA
[2] Imperial Coll London, Hammersmith Hosp, Dept Surg & Canc, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.1038/s41571-023-00788-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The FDA Accelerated Approval pathway, which has been pivotal in enabling early access to new oncology drugs over the past three decades, has recently come under increased scrutiny. New draft guidance published in March 2023 offers several possible solutions to improve this pathway, with the ultimate goal of improving outcomes for patients with cancer, but might also have important limitations.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 578
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The FDA’s latest draft guidance on accelerated approvals — one step forward, two steps back?
    David J. Benjamin
    Mark P. Lythgoe
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2023, 20 : 577 - 578
  • [2] One step back, two steps forward
    Bennett, Michael
    MATERIALS WORLD, 2012, 20 (11) : 12 - 13
  • [3] Two steps forward, one step back
    DavisBlake, A
    Pfeffer, J
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1996, 21 (02): : 340 - 343
  • [4] Two steps forward, one step back
    Trossman, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2002, 102 (06) : 87 - +
  • [5] One step forward, two steps back
    Manning, Philip
    SYMBOLIC INTERACTION, 2006, 29 (03) : 411 - 417
  • [6] Two steps forward, one step back
    Lasry, Nathaniel
    Guillemette, Jonathan
    Mazur, Eric
    NATURE PHYSICS, 2014, 10 (06) : 402 - 403
  • [7] One step forward, two steps back
    Mihai Gheorghiade
    Andrew Ambrosy
    Nature Reviews Cardiology, 2011, 8 : 72 - 73
  • [8] One step forward, two steps back
    Benjamin, Robert S.
    Lee, J. Jack
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2014, 15 (04): : 366 - 367
  • [9] One step forward, two steps back
    Lamiell, JT
    Weigert, SC
    PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 1996, 7 (04) : 335 - 339
  • [10] One step forward, two steps back
    McFaul, M
    JOURNAL OF DEMOCRACY, 2000, 11 (03): : 19 - +