Pain Behaviors Analyzed by Videorecording in Brain-Injured Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

被引:1
|
作者
Lopez-Lopez, Candelas [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Arranz-Esteban, Antonio [1 ]
Sanchez-Sanchez, Ma Mar [4 ]
Perez-Perez, Teresa [5 ]
Arias-Rivera, Susana [6 ,7 ]
Solis-Munoz, Montserrat [8 ,9 ]
Latorre-Marco, Ignacio [9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ 12 Octubre, Emergency & Trauma Intens Care Unit, Madrid, Spain
[2] Inst Investiganon Sanitaria Hosp 12 Octubre imas12, Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Complutense Madrid, Physiotherapy & Podiatry Facultie, Madrid, Spain
[4] Hosp Univ Getafe, Intens Care Unit, Madrid, Spain
[5] Univ Complutense Madrid, Dept Stat & OR 3, Madrid, Spain
[6] Hosp Univ Getafe, Hosp Nurse & Hlth Care Res, Madrid, Spain
[7] Inst Salud Carlos III, CIBER Resp Dis, Madrid, Spain
[8] Hosp Univ Puerta De Hierro Majadahonda, Nursing Dept, Madrid, Spain
[9] Puerta Hierro Segovia Arana Hlth Res Inst, Nursing & Hlth Care Res Grp, Madrid, Spain
[10] Hosp Univ Puerta Hierro Majadahonda, Intens Care Unit, Madrid, Spain
关键词
OBSERVATION TOOL; SCALE; VALIDATION; CONSCIOUSNESS; DISORDERS; INDICATORS; MANAGEMENT; SCORE; COMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.pmn.2022.07.008
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim: To describe and classify pain behaviors (facial and body) in brain-injured patients with a low level of consciousness before, during, and after the performance of painful and non-painful care procedures. Methods: Facial behaviors and body movements in brain-injured patients were videotaped at rest, during the application of three care procedures (two painful and one non-painful), and 15 minutes after completion of these procedures. Each video recording was evaluated by expert evaluators blinded to each other. For each of the behaviors observed, all possible combinations between the three procedures and/or time were compared using the McNemar test. Effect size was measured by the difference in proportions using the Wilson score 95% confidence intervals. Results: Twenty-seven patients were included. The mean (standard deviation) Glasgow Coma Score was 5.4 (1.9). A total of 33 behaviors (29 active, four neutral) were registered. Expression of behaviors was more common during the painful procedures compared with the other time points (non-painful procedures, baseline, and final evaluation). Inter-evaluator agreement was substantial (Kappa index >0.7) in more than 50% of the observed behaviors. Conclusions: In this study involving brain-injured patients with a low level of consciousness, facial, body, and ventilation-related behaviors were more common during painful procedures. Agreement between evaluators to detect the presence or absence of these behaviors was substantial. These findings underscore the need to develop pain assessment measures specific to this patient population. (C) 2022 American Society for Pain Management Nursing. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 122
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment and detection of pain in noncommunicative severely brain-injured patients
    Schnakers, Caroline
    Chatelle, Camille
    Majerus, Steve
    Gosseries, Olivia
    De Val, Marie
    Laureys, Steven
    EXPERT REVIEW OF NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2010, 10 (11) : 1725 - 1731
  • [22] Pain indicators in brain-injured critical care adults: An integrative review
    Roulin, Marie-Jose
    Ramelet, Anne-Sylvie
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 25 (02) : 110 - 118
  • [23] TRACHEOTOMY IN BRAIN-INJURED PATIENTS
    TROUPP, H
    EYE EAR NOSE AND THROAT MONTHLY, 1966, 45 (04): : 49 - &
  • [24] Evolution of potentially brain-dead patients admitted to an intensive care unit
    Darmon, PL
    Fulgencio, JP
    Beydon, L
    Bonnet, F
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 76 : A19 - A19
  • [25] A Pluridisciplinary Tracheostomy Weaning Protocol for Brain-Injured Patients, Outside of the Intensive Care Unit and Without Instrumental Assessment: Results of Pilot Study
    Gallice, Thomas
    Cugy, Emmanuelle
    Germain, Christine
    Barthelemy, Clement
    Laimay, Julie
    Gaube, Julie
    Engelhardt, Melanie
    Branchard, Olivier
    Maloizel, Elodie
    Frison, Eric
    Dehail, Patrick
    Cuny, Emmanuel
    DYSPHAGIA, 2024, 39 (04) : 608 - 622
  • [26] Discharge criteria from intensive care unit in brain injured patients - Comment
    Stocchetti, N
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2004, 146 (05) : 456 - 456
  • [27] Pyrexia in head-injured patients admitted to intensive care
    Stocchetti, N
    Rossi, S
    Zanier, ER
    Colombo, A
    Beretta, L
    Citerio, G
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 28 (11) : 1555 - 1562
  • [28] EVOLUTION OF PATIENTS WITH DEVASTATING BRAIN INJURY ADMITTED IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT FOR INTENSIVE CARE TO FACILITATE ORGAN DONATION
    Perez, Alicia
    Acevedo, Maria
    Padilla, Maria
    Dolores Perojo, Maria
    Herrero, Eugenio
    Robles, Juan
    Fernandez, Maria
    Lara, Ramon
    Garcia, Nieves
    Flores, Eva
    Martinez Perez, Adolfo
    Vallejo, Ana
    Barber, Maria
    Rodriguez, Sergio
    Santapau, Albert
    Virgos, Beatriz
    Rodriguez, Maria
    Garcia, Fernando
    Palmer, Margarita
    Large, Lucas
    Rivero, Carmen
    Moya Sanzhez, Jose
    Saez, Salvadora
    Zapata, Luis
    Gomez, Aroa
    Quindos, Brigida
    Nebra, Agustin
    Coll, Elisabeth
    Dominguez-Gil, Beatriz
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 34 : 14 - 15
  • [29] Pyrexia in head-injured patients admitted to intensive care
    Nino Stocchetti
    Sandra Rossi
    Elisa Zanier
    Angelo Colombo
    Luigi Beretta
    Giuseppe Citerio
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2002, 28 : 1555 - 1562
  • [30] Pain management of nalbuphine and sufentanil in patients admitted intensive care unit of different ages
    Ji, Kaiqiang
    Gong, Xiaoying
    Luan, Ting
    Gao, Xiaopeng
    Zang, Bin
    BMC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 22 (01)