The Usability of Homelab, a Digital Self-service at a Dutch General Practice, for Diagnostic Tests: Pilot Study With a Questionnaire

被引:1
|
作者
Schnoor, Kyma [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Versluis, Anke [1 ,2 ]
Chavannes, Niels H. [1 ,2 ]
Talboom-Kamp, Esther P. W. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Hippocratespad 21, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Natl eHlth Living Lab, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Unilabs, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
eHealth; diagnostic testing; general practitioner; general practice; GP; referral; online testing; diagnostic; laboratory test; usability; digital health; health care service; service delivery; HEALTH; CARE;
D O I
10.2196/42151
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: eHealth potentially can make health care more accessible and efficient and help reduce the workload in primary health care. Homelab is an eHealth tool implemented in a general practice environment, and it offers relatively simple laboratory diagnostic tests without the referral of the general practitioner. After logging in this eHealth tool, patients select and order a diagnostic test based on their symptoms. The test results are presented online to the general practitioner and the patient.Objective: This study aims to evaluate the use, usability, and user characteristics of Homelab. Further, it aims to evaluate whether Homelab replaces an appointment with the general practitioner. Methods: Homelab has been implemented since May 2021 as a pilot in a Dutch general practice. The number of requests and the ordered diagnostic packages are monitored. After using Homelab, patients are invited to complete a short questionnaire. The questionnaire contains demographic questions and assesses usability using the System Usability Scale (10 items). In addition, questions about requesting an appointment with the general practitioner without Homelab are included. All data were anonymous.Results: The questionnaire was filled by 74 individual patients. The mean age of the patients was 40.33 (SD 12.11) years, and half of them were females (39/74, 53%). The majority of the patients were highly educated (56/74, 76%) and employed (53/74, 72%). Approximately 81% (60/74) of the patients reported that they would use Homelab again in the future and 66% (49/74) reported that they would have gone to the general practitioner if they had not used Homelab. The usability of Homelab was perceived higher by the younger age group (mean 73.96, SD 14.74) than by the older age group (mean 61.59, SD 14.37). In total, 106 test packages were ordered over 1 year, and the most requested diagnostic package was "Am I still healthy? I want to do my annual health checkup." Homelab was used the most during the months of the COVID-19 lockdown.Conclusions: The use of Homelab, a digital self-service for ordering diagnostic tests, was monitored in this study, and its usability was perceived as above average. Our findings showed that patients are willing to use Homelab in the future and they would use it most of the time as a replacement for regular consultations. Homelab offers opportunities for more accessible and efficient health care for both the patient and the general practitioner.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [21] The impact of a false-positive colorectal cancer-screening test on quality of life: a pilot study in Dutch general practice
    Blanker, Marco H.
    van der Velde, Jantina L.
    Berger, Marjolein Y.
    Berendsen, Annette J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2015, 24 : 33 - 33
  • [22] Documentation of shared decision-making in diagnostic testing for dementia in Dutch general practice: A retrospective study in electronic patient records
    Linden, Iris
    Perry, Marieke
    Wolfs, Claire
    Schers, Henk
    Dirksen, Carmen
    Ponds, Rudolf
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2025, 130
  • [23] External Validation of the PUMA COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire in a General Practice Sample (Hospital Maciel-Montevideo) and the PLATINO Study Population
    Montes de Oca, M.
    Lopez Varela, M.
    Wehrmeister, F. C.
    Ramirez, L.
    Rodriguez Flores, C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 199
  • [24] COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ) for selecting at-risk patients for spirometry: a cross-sectional study in Australian general practice
    Anthony J Stanley
    Iqbal Hasan
    Alan J Crockett
    Onno C P van Schayck
    Nicholas A Zwar
    npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, 24
  • [25] COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ) for selecting at-risk patients for spirometry: a cross-sectional study in Australian general practice
    Stanley, Anthony J.
    Hasan, Iqbal
    Crockett, Alan J.
    van Schayck, Onno C. P.
    Zwar, Nicholas A.
    NPJ PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 24
  • [26] THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A PERIPATETIC ALLERGY NURSE PRACTITIONER SERVICE IN MANAGING ATOPIC ALLERGY IN GENERAL-PRACTICE - A PILOT-STUDY
    BRYDON, M
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 1993, 23 (12): : 1037 - 1044
  • [27] Youth StepCare: a pilot study of an online screening and recommendations service for depression and anxiety among youth patients in general practice
    Belinda Louise Parker
    Melinda Rose Achilles
    Mirjana Subotic-Kerry
    Bridianne O’Dea
    BMC Family Practice, 21
  • [28] Youth StepCare: a pilot study of an online screening and recommendations service for depression and anxiety among youth patients in general practice
    Parker, Belinda Louise
    Achilles, Melinda Rose
    Subotic-Kerry, Mirjana
    O'Dea, Bridianne
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [29] Effectiveness of a cognitive behavioral self-help program for patients with primary insomnia in general practice - A pilot study
    Katofsky, Inga
    Backhaus, Jutta
    Junghanns, Klaus
    Rumpf, Hans-Juergen
    Hueppe, Michael
    von Eitzen, Ulrich
    Hohagen, Fritz
    SLEEP MEDICINE, 2012, 13 (05) : 463 - 468
  • [30] Diagnostic accuracy: sensitivity and specificity of the ScreenAssist Lumbar Questionnaire in comparison with primary care provider tests and measures of low back pain: a pilot study
    Cunningham, Shala
    JOURNAL OF MANUAL & MANIPULATIVE THERAPY, 2013, 21 (01) : 48 - 59