Formative and Summative Automated Assessment with Multiple-Choice Question Banks

被引:4
|
作者
Beerepoot, Maarten T. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Dept Chem, N-9037 Tromso, Norway
关键词
First-Year Undergraduate; General Chemistry; Testing; Assessment; Item Banks; E-Learning; Online Quizzes; Web-Based Learning; ChatGPT; PERFORMANCE; CLASSROOM; DESIGN; TESTS; POWER; EXAMS;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00120
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Digital automated assessment is a valuable and time-efficienttoolfor educators to provide immediate and objective feedback to learners.Automated assessment, however, puts high demands on the quality ofthe questions, alignment with the intended learning outcomes, andthe quality of the feedback provided to the learners. We here describethe development and use of a large number (N >180)of question banks with multiple items (N & GE;20) that are aligned to the intended learning outcomes of an undergraduategeneral chemistry course. Even though the development of a large numberof high-quality question banks is a formidable task, they allow forflexible and easy-to-implement solutions for formative and summativeassessment once developed. We here discuss three applications of thequestion banks: formative assessment in large online classes, practicetests that provide formative assessment outside classes, and summativeassessment through a digital exam. We highlight the importance ofaligning the question banks with intended learning outcomes, providingadditional feedback to the learners and of quality assurance of thequestion banks, and show how the combined use of the question bankssupports student self-regulated learning. We hope that the presentwork can inspire others to discover the various applications of questionbanks for formative and summative assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:2947 / 2955
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] SUMMATIVE AND FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT: A DIFFICULT DIALOGUE
    Pinto, Jorge
    Santos, Leonor
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 36TH CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL GROUP FOR PSYCHOLOGY OF MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, VOL. 4: OPPORTUNITIES TO LEARN IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2012, : 315 - 315
  • [43] AN ONLINE SUMMATIVE AND FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM
    Lois, Alejandro
    [J]. ICERI2015: 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2015, : 6910 - 6918
  • [44] Summative Assessment Based on Two-Tier Multiple-Choice Questions: Item Discrimination and Engineering Students' and Teachers' Attitudes
    Gero, Aharon
    Stav, Yinnon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2021, 37 (03) : 830 - 840
  • [45] Formative and Summative Assessment of Concept Maps
    Marriott, R. C. V.
    Torres, Patricia Lupion
    [J]. INNOVATING WITH CONCEPT MAPPING, CMC 2016, 2016, 635 : 98 - 111
  • [46] Testing anatomy: Dissecting spatial and non-spatial knowledge in multiple-choice question assessment
    Dickson, Julie
    Shaw, Darren J.
    Gardiner, Andrew
    Rhind, Susan
    [J]. ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2024, 17 (01) : 102 - 113
  • [47] Assessing Competency in Central Venous Catheter Placement: Development and Validation of a Multiple-Choice Question Assessment
    Ussia, Alessandro
    Vaccari, Samuele
    Cervellera, Maurizio
    Melina, Marica
    Zorzetti, Noemi
    Brighi, Manuela
    Belvedere, Angela
    Tonini, Valeria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2018, 227 (04) : E202 - E202
  • [48] MCQ4 - A PROGRAM FOR MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTION EVALUATION
    CORBETT, M
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1986, 20 (01) : 77 - 77
  • [49] Development and validation of a multiple-choice question paper in basic colonoscopy
    Thomas-Gibson, S
    Saunders, BP
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 37 (09) : 821 - 826
  • [50] Cross-lingual Training for Multiple-Choice Question Answering
    Echegoyen, Guillermo
    Rodrigo, Alvaro
    Penas, Anselmo
    [J]. PROCESAMIENTO DEL LENGUAJE NATURAL, 2020, (65): : 37 - 44