Formative and Summative Automated Assessment with Multiple-Choice Question Banks

被引:4
|
作者
Beerepoot, Maarten T. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Dept Chem, N-9037 Tromso, Norway
关键词
First-Year Undergraduate; General Chemistry; Testing; Assessment; Item Banks; E-Learning; Online Quizzes; Web-Based Learning; ChatGPT; PERFORMANCE; CLASSROOM; DESIGN; TESTS; POWER; EXAMS;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00120
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Digital automated assessment is a valuable and time-efficienttoolfor educators to provide immediate and objective feedback to learners.Automated assessment, however, puts high demands on the quality ofthe questions, alignment with the intended learning outcomes, andthe quality of the feedback provided to the learners. We here describethe development and use of a large number (N >180)of question banks with multiple items (N & GE;20) that are aligned to the intended learning outcomes of an undergraduategeneral chemistry course. Even though the development of a large numberof high-quality question banks is a formidable task, they allow forflexible and easy-to-implement solutions for formative and summativeassessment once developed. We here discuss three applications of thequestion banks: formative assessment in large online classes, practicetests that provide formative assessment outside classes, and summativeassessment through a digital exam. We highlight the importance ofaligning the question banks with intended learning outcomes, providingadditional feedback to the learners and of quality assurance of thequestion banks, and show how the combined use of the question bankssupports student self-regulated learning. We hope that the presentwork can inspire others to discover the various applications of questionbanks for formative and summative assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:2947 / 2955
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Study of Summative Evaluation by New Multiple-choice Question Format
    Ohshima, Naoki
    Ishimatsu, Jun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS I & II, 2017, : 991 - 997
  • [2] Study of Summative Evaluation by New Multiple-Choice Question Format
    Ohshima, Naoki
    Okamoto, Kazuya
    Takahashi, Masakazu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS I & II, 2016, : 1262 - 1266
  • [3] Who Wants to Be a Psychology Graduate? Impact of Formative Multiple-choice Review Questions on Summative Assessment Performance
    Short, Fay
    Martin, Jesse
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY LEARNING AND TEACHING-PLAT, 2012, 11 (02): : 218 - 227
  • [4] Question Guru: An Automated Multiple-Choice Question Generation System
    Gilal, Abdul Rehman
    Waqas, Ahmad
    Talpur, Bandeh Ali
    Abro, Rizwan Ali
    Jaafar, Jafreezal
    Amur, Zaira Hassan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, ICETIS 2022, VOL 2, 2023, 573 : 501 - 514
  • [5] ASSESSMENT IN MEDICINE - MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTION CONTROVERSY
    ANDERSON, J
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 1979, 1 (06) : 303 - 303
  • [6] MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTION
    CLEVELAND, A
    [J]. ASTRONAUTICS & AERONAUTICS, 1978, 16 (09): : 19 - 19
  • [7] Automated content analysis of multiple-choice test item banks
    Ford, JM
    Stetz, TA
    Bott, MM
    O'Leary, BS
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2000, 18 (03) : 258 - 271
  • [8] Instructor perspectives of multiple-choice questions in summative assessment for novice programmers
    Shuhidan, Shuhaida
    Hamilton, Margaret
    D'Souza, Daryl
    [J]. COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2010, 20 (03) : 229 - 259
  • [9] MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTION HELPER
    NORCINI, JJ
    LIPNER, RS
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1986, 105 (05) : 817 - 818
  • [10] FORMATIVE (IN-COURSE) GRADUATE ASSESSMENT - DESIGN OF AN ACCURATE MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTION EXAMINATION AND THE TRAINING MERITS THEREOF
    GLEDHILL, RF
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1983, 64 (13): : 476 - 477