What Machine Learning Can and Cannot Do for Inertial Confinement Fusion

被引:1
|
作者
Cheng, Baolian [1 ]
Bradley, Paul A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab LANL, POB 1663, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
关键词
machine learning; inertial confinement fusion; IDENTIFICATION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.3390/plasma6020023
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
Machine learning methodologies have played remarkable roles in solving complex systems with large data, well-defined input-output pairs, and clearly definable goals and metrics. The methodologies are effective in image analysis, classification, and systems without long chains of logic. Recently, machine-learning methodologies have been widely applied to inertial confinement fusion (ICF) capsules and the design optimization of OMEGA (Omega Laser Facility) capsule implosion and NIF (National Ignition Facility) ignition capsules, leading to significant progress. As machine learning is being increasingly applied, concerns arise regarding its capabilities and limitations in the context of ICF. ICF is a complicated physical system that relies on physics knowledge and human judgment to guide machine learning. Additionally, the experimental database for ICF ignition is not large enough to provide credible training data. Most researchers in the field of ICF use simulations, or a mix of simulations and experimental results, instead of real data to train machine learning models and related tools. They then use the trained learning model to predict future events. This methodology can be successful, subject to a careful choice of data and simulations. However, because of the extreme sensitivity of the neutron yield to the input implosion parameters, physics-guided machine learning for ICF is extremely important and necessary, especially when the database is small, the uncertain-domain knowledge is large, and the physical capabilities of the learning models are still being developed. In this work, we identify problems in ICF that are suitable for machine learning and circumstances where machine learning is less likely to be successful. This study investigates the applications of machine learning and highlights fundamental research challenges and directions associated with machine learning in ICF.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 344
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Descriptive studies: what they can and cannot do
    Grimes, DA
    Schulz, KF
    LANCET, 2002, 359 (9301): : 145 - 149
  • [32] INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION
    NUCKOLLS, JH
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 1977, 22 (09): : 1089 - 1089
  • [33] INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION
    NAKAI, S
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 1991, 31 (04) : 783 - 788
  • [34] INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION
    YAMANAKA, C
    PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 1982, T2 : 486 - 491
  • [35] Machine learning-driven image synthesis and analysis applications for inertial confinement fusion (invited)
    Wolfe, Bradley T.
    Chu, Pinghan
    Nguyen-Fotiadis, Nga T. T.
    Zhang, Xinhua
    Alvarado Alvarez, Mariana
    Wang, Zhehui
    Review of Scientific Instruments, 2024, 95 (12):
  • [36] A machine-learning augmented mixed method for simulating α particle transport in inertial confinement fusion
    Liu, Chang
    Du, Bao
    Song, Peng
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2024, 515
  • [37] INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION
    KEEFE, D
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF NUCLEAR AND PARTICLE SCIENCE, 1982, 32 : 391 - 441
  • [38] INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION
    YAMANAKA, C
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 1983, 23 (01) : 108 - 115
  • [39] INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION
    MANISCALCO, JA
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENERGY, 1980, 5 : 33 - 60
  • [40] DRVs for the European Union - what they can and what they cannot do
    Przyrembel, Hildegard
    ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2015, 67 : 23 - 23