Measuring parental income using administrative data. What is the best proxy available?

被引:0
|
作者
Jerrim, John [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] UCL Inst Educ, Dept Social Sci, London, England
[2] UCL, UCL Inst Educ, Dept Social Sci, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, England
关键词
Administrative data; proxy measures; income-achievement gaps; permanent income; SCHOOL MEAL ELIGIBILITY; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; HEALTH; DEPRIVATION; MOBILITY; COSTS; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1080/02671522.2023.2271930
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Administrative data are increasingly being used to study inequalities in education. Yet a well-known difficulty with such resources is the limited information they hold. A commonly used proxy for children coming from a low-income background is their eligibility for free school meals, yet this is likely to be of little use in measuring academic achievement amongst middle and high-income groups. This study adds to the literature by showing how eligibility for free school meals - averaged over the time a child has spent at school - is the best available proxy for low income during childhood. In contrast, creating a continuous index combining free school meal eligibility with information on the neighbourhood in which they live represents the best way of comparing educational outcomes across children from low, average and high-income backgrounds.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measuring Income and Wealth Effects on Private-Label Demand with Matched Administrative Data
    Brancatelli, Calogero
    Fritzsche, Adrian
    Inderst, Roman
    Otter, Thomas
    [J]. MARKETING SCIENCE, 2022, 41 (03) : 637 - 656
  • [22] What Is the Best Available Evidence for Using Homeopathy in Patients with Intellectual Disabilities?
    Shaddel, Farshad
    Ghazirad, Marjan
    Bryant, Mark
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2014, 24 (04) : 339 - 344
  • [23] Measuring the quality of diabetes care using administrative data: Is there bias?
    Keating, NL
    Landrum, MB
    Landon, BE
    Ayanian, JZ
    Borbas, C
    Guadagnoli, E
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2003, 38 (06) : 1529 - 1545
  • [24] Measuring Childbirth Outcomes Using Administrative and Birth Certificate Data
    Glance, Laurent G.
    Hasley, Steve
    Glantz, J. Christopher
    Stevens, Timothy P.
    Faden, Eric
    Kreso, Melissa A.
    Pyne, Sonia G.
    Wissler, Richard N.
    Fichter, Jennifer
    Gloff, Marjorie S.
    Dick, Andrew W.
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 131 (02) : 238 - 253
  • [25] Measuring Irregular Migration and Population Flows - What Available Data Can Tell
    Kraler, Albert
    Reichel, David
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION, 2011, 49 (05) : 97 - 128
  • [26] Patient Preference and Contraindications in Measuring Quality of Care: What Do Administrative Data Miss?
    Ryoo, Joan J.
    Ordin, Diana L.
    Antonio, Anna Liza M.
    Oishi, Sabine M.
    Gould, Michael K.
    Asch, Steven M.
    Malin, Jennifer L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (21) : 2716 - +
  • [27] What is the best way of measuring an image quality index from CT data?
    Ogden, K
    Huda, W
    Scalzetti, E
    Roskopf, M
    Ogden, D
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) : 1905 - 1905
  • [28] Measuring US fertility using administrative data from the Census Bureau
    Genadek, Katie
    Sanders, Joshua
    Stevenson, Amanda
    [J]. DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH, 2022, 47 : 37 - 58
  • [29] Developing a cancer-specific trigger tool to identify adverse events using administrative data.
    Weingart, Saul N.
    Koethe, Benjamin
    Nelson, Jason
    Yaghi, Omar
    Kent, David M.
    Hassett, Michael J.
    Lipitz-Snyderman, Allison
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (27)
  • [30] Measuring agreement of administrative data with chart data using prevalence unadjusted and adjusted kappa
    Guanmin Chen
    Peter Faris
    Brenda Hemmelgarn
    Robin L Walker
    Hude Quan
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9