Symmetrical Midfacial Growth After Pediatric Mandibular Reconstruction With Free Fibula Flap

被引:1
|
作者
Liu, Shuo [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Wen-Bo [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yu, Yao [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Mao, Chi [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yu, Guang-Yan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Peng, Xin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Ctr Stomatol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Engn Lab Digital & Mat Technol Stomatol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] 22 Zhongguancun South Ave, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
SURGERY; DEFECTS; MAXILLA; GRAFT;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2023.08.224
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Free fibula is the workhorse flap for mandibular reconstruction and is increasingly being used in pediatric patients. However, craniomaxillofacial growth and development involve interdependent processes, and it remains unknown whether mandibular reconstruction with free fibula allows symmetric growth of the midface. Purpose: The study evaluated midfacial symmetry after pediatric mandibular defect reconstruction. Study Design, Setting, Sample: This retrospective cohort study included pediatric patients aged #14 years who underwent mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flap. Postoperative computed tomography data were obtained at predefined follow-up time points. Midfacial symmetry was evaluated based on 3-dimensional (3D) cephalometry. Predictor variable: The predictor variable was the side of the midface (affected or healthy side relative to the mandibular defect). Main Outcome Variables: The primary outcome variable was postoperative midfacial symmetry (at 1 week, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and >3 years, or after the age of 18 years), assessed in horizontal, vertical, and anteroposterior dimensions using 3D cephalometry. Another outcome variable was patient satisfaction based on a self-evaluation using visual analog scoring. Covariates: Sex, age, diagnosis, and type of denture restoration. Analyses: Paired t tests were performed to assess the relationship between the predictor and outcome variables, with the significance level of P <.05. Results: A total of 13 patients were included in this study (9 males and 4 females; mean age: 12.23 +/- 2.39 years). The average distance from upper first molar point (U6) to the horizontal plane on the affected side became greater than on the healthy side (difference: 0.7 +/- 0.5 mm to 1.6 +/- 1.4 mm, P <.05), while the average distance from pterygomaxillary fissure to coronal plane on affected side became shorter than that on the healthy side (difference: 0.6 +/- 0.6 mm to 1.2 +/- 1.1 mm, P <.05) from 1 year after the surgery. There were no statistically significant differences in the remaining measurements between the 2 sides (P >.05). All the patients were satisfied with their postoperative facial symmetry. Conclusions and Relevance: There were no severe midface deformities after pediatric mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flap. Meanwhile, pediatric mandibular reconstruction and proper occlusion could promote midfacial growth and symmetry. (C) 2023 The Authors.
引用
收藏
页码:1594 / 1605
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Functional Outcomes After the Sacrifice of Mandibular Condyle Using Fibula Free Flap for Immediate Surgical Reconstruction
    Rogers, Ashton L.
    Farsi, Soroush
    Slater, Noah
    Gardner, James R.
    King, Deanne
    Sunde, Jumin
    Vural, Emre
    Moreno, Mauricio
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [42] Donor-Site Morbidity Following Free Fibula Flap Harvest for Mandibular or Maxillary Reconstruction in Pediatric Patients
    Santamaria, Eric
    Roberto Galaso-Trujillo, Jose
    Palafox, Damian
    Rubio Mainardi, Soledad
    Aramburo Garcia, Rigoberto
    Carrillo Romero, Andrea
    Trujillo Rangel, Walter Angel
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (05) : E464 - E468
  • [44] Early outcomes of osteofascial versus osteocutaneous fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction
    Shilo, Shahaf
    Muhanna, Nidal
    Fliss, Dan M.
    Horowitz, Gilad
    Warshavsky, Anton
    Mansour, Jobran
    Ianculovici, Clariel
    Fliss, Ehud
    Barnea, Yoav
    Zaretski, Arik
    Yanko, Ravit
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2024, 46 (05): : 1168 - 1177
  • [45] Rehabilitation after mandibular reconstruction with fibula free-flap: clinical outcome and quality of life assessment
    Hundepool, A. C.
    Dumans, A. G.
    Hofer, S. O. P.
    Fokkens, N. J. W.
    Rayat, S. S.
    van der Meij, E. H.
    Schepman, K. P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 37 (11) : 1009 - 1013
  • [46] Distraction osteogenesis of a fibula free flap used for mandibular reconstruction: preliminary report
    Friedrich, RE
    Schmelzle, R
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1999, 27 (06) : 398 - 398
  • [47] Factors influencing CAD/CAM accuracy in fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction
    Sweed, Ahmed Hassan
    Bolzoni, Alessandro Remigio
    Kadubiec, Aleksandra
    Beltramini, Giada Anna
    Cherchi, Alessandro
    Baj, Alessandro
    ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICA ITALICA, 2020, 40 (02) : 138 - 143
  • [48] Microvascular reconstruction with free fibula osteocutaneous flap in mandibular ameloblastomas—an institutional experience
    Goil P.
    Patil A.N.
    Malhotra K.
    Chaudhary G.
    European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2018, 41 (1) : 15 - 20
  • [49] Factors Affecting Bone Fusion in Mandibular Reconstruction With Vascularized Free Fibula Flap
    Palla, Benjamin
    Barawi, Kaldoun
    Burian, Egon
    Lenhart, Nicolas
    Moles, Sarah Loren
    Callahan, Nicholas
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 35 (06) : 1755 - 1758
  • [50] Surgical planning in reconstruction of mandibular defect with fibula free flap: 15 patients
    Valentini, V
    Agrillo, A
    Battisti, A
    Gennaro, P
    Calabrese, L
    Iannetti, G
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 16 (04) : 601 - 607